Comment on My Recent Blog: Public Policy Group Rings In On SBC/AT&T

Greg Galitzine : Greg Galitzine's VoIP Authority Blog
Greg Galitzine

Comment on My Recent Blog: Public Policy Group Rings In On SBC/AT&T

I received a comment on my post yesterday regarding the Competitive Enterprise Institue and their position vis a vis the SBC/AT&T situation. My goal was not to promote any particular agenda or groups. I was just sharing something I found interesting. I'm a sharer.

Anyway, regarding the following comment, I only have one rebuttal before I share it with you: I did not insert the words "non-partisan" -- that's the way the CEI media alert came to me.

Having cleared that up, please check out the following response from Daniel Taylor, Managing Director of the Mobile Enterprise Alliance, Inc.


Because an organization is a non-profit, that does not mean that they are not partisan. In fact, you have inserted the "non-partisan" verbiage into the blurb about the CEI, something that the organization does not do in its boilerplate. From their website:

"The Competitive Enterprise Institute is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government."

Which is, by definition, a political mission. CEI is a right-wing group that is arguing for the re-creation of a monopoly because it faces competition.

I won't go into the underlying economics of monopolies and the market solutions to which they lead. There is no dispute among economists that monopolies lead to higher prices and chronic under-production. To make the case that a monopoly will be more competitive with these so-called "intermodal" competitors is ludicrous.

I would like to point out that SBC is partners with BellSouth in Cingular Wireless, which is the largest wireless operator in the United States. Also, SBC has attempted to quash the VoIP industry with the recent TIPToP filing.

In fact, the only reason for this monopoly is so that SBC will actually have less competition in the long run. To give a better understanding of SBC's modus operandi, in SBC's leading states (Texas, Missouri and Ohio), Intra-LATA tariffs are two to four times higher than the tariffs in states where SBC has a reduced corporate presence and does not control the state Public Utility Commission.

I support VoIP and its future. If organizations like CEI had their way, there never would have been a breakup of Ma Bell, or the '96 Act for that matter. Had this been the case, there would not have been a dotcom boom, and we would not have the IP network infrastructure in place to support IP telephony services.

Historically, AT&T (pre-breakup) fought all attempts at deregulation, including the attachment of non-AT&T hardware to the network. The Carterphone decision was the one that allowed for third-party PBXes and subsequently data communications devices like the routers that have been Cisco's bread and butter for the past two decades.

Only a knee-jerk partisan would dust off an old argument to justify an ideology. For those of us who support VoIP and competitive markets for technologies and telecommunications services, that ideology fails to agree with history.

And that's a history that has led us to where we are today. Knowing what we do today, I find it hard to argue for large, vertically-integrated telcos. In general, such companies fail to innovate at the rate that we have come to expect, and they resist all forms of competition from every quarter.

If you need proof of the way SBC plans on behaving, they are already a monopoly in the local telephone market in more than a dozen states, including Texas, California and Illinois. In these markets, they have already proposed an onerous tariff for competitive VoIP providers. This tariff is known as TIPToP. Were companies like Vonage or Skype to use this tariff, there is an incredibly high likelihood that both companies would be bankrupt within six months of signing and interconnection agreement rules by TIPToP.

But CEI is governed, not by facts and history, but a mission of "free enterprise and limited government." This mission has oddly led them to a very self-serving conclusion about this proposed merger.



Feedback for Comment on My Recent Blog: Public Policy Group Rings In On SBC/AT&T

6 Comments

Hmm what's with the inflatable message? hehe

http://www.dir-inflatables.com
China inflatables,Inflatable games,Inflatable boucers,Inflatable slides,Inflatable castles,Water games,Balloons,Inflatable tents,Inflatable boats,Inflatable advertising,Inflatable santa,Inflatable pools,Inflatable cartoon,PVC toy,Inflatable toy.We offer the good price and quality for all of our inflatables.
http://www.dir-inflatables.com
inflatable.com

>The Competitive Enterprise Institute is a non->profit public policy organization dedicated to >the principles of free enterprise and limited >government."

You can write anything you want. This doesn't change the fact that it IS profitable.

Jair

VINYL CUTTER for Sign Making-Excellent Vinyl cutter from Redsail China

Redsail, have developed vinyl cutter for the sign industry and with our own technology, we have the copyright of the firmware, we have 4 patents in China. By applying the latest software algorithm and the mechanism for precision machine manufacturing, which was obtained from a long experience in related industries. we are the leader in the China sign industry, we can provide the total solution in Sign making field.
We believe we supply vinyl cutter at the unbeatable prices in the World. Most machines are in stock for immediate dispatch. If you require help or advice please call our sales team or visit our website.We believe Redsail vinyl cutter can help you to make success in the Sign market.

Redsail, have developed vinyl cutter for the sign industry and with our own technology, we have the copyright of the firmware, we have 4 patents in China. By applying the latest software algorithm and the mechanism for precision machine manufacturing, which was obtained from a long experience in related industries. we are the leader in the China sign industry, we can provide the total solution in Sign making field.

Chinee Inflatable was established eight years ago by young entrepreneurs. Our 6-year-old manufacturing facility resides in Guangzhou and we have our engineers, accessories, sales and technical support departments. We are currently pioneering the field by introducing new customers made textured fabrics according to thematic design needs. We comply with industry-wide safety regulations on a daily basis. Customer Satisfaction, Quality, Safety, Innovation, Creativity, and FUN .that's what driver us. http://www.bounce-house.cn

Bouncer, Castles Slides, Fun city, Obstacles, Sports, Tunnels, Tents, Arches, Cartoons, Moving cartoon, Products shape, Christmas, Air dancer, Water games, Balloons, PVC model, Folder, Pools, Inflatable Boat.

E-mail: export@bounce-house.cn
The size and color can be changed according to your requirements or according to the size in our webpage or catalogue. we can print your picture or logo on the inflatable products, and you can offer the picture in any format made by Photoshop or Coredraw, for more information, please refer to our website.

Featured Events