« April 8, 2007 | Main | April 10, 2007 »
Blogging and Human Rights
April 9, 2007
I was reading a wonderful AP story on human rights in the middle east and how bloggers are potentially transforming countries from the inside out. The problem of course is some middle eastern countries are jailing bloggers and blocking their blogs form being accessed in their county.
Reporters Without Borders has five Mideast countries -- Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia and Syria -- on its list of the globe's 13 worst Internet freedom enemies that block web sites and detain bloggers. Most of us are likely not surprised by the strong middle east showing in this statistic.
According to the article, governments defend their Web regulations, saying they are protecting citizens from "immoral" and "defamatory" content. But rights groups and bloggers say officials are really trying to retain their media control.
"Five years ago, authorities didn't care about bloggers because the Internet's reach was less," said Julien Pain, head of Reporters Without Borders' Internet Freedom Desk. "Now, what is most interesting is the Weblogs in the local languages. You look at what the authorities censor -- they censor content in local languages."
Rights groups have been especially critical of Iran, where there have been some arrests of bloggers. Iran has also blocked some Web sites critical of the government -- even shutting down access to the video-sharing forum YouTube.com, where Iranian opposition groups abroad have posted videos.
According to the article, governments defend their Web regulations, saying they are protecting citizens from "immoral" and "defamatory" content. But rights groups and bloggers say officials are really trying to retain their media control.
"Five years ago, authorities didn't care about bloggers because the Internet's reach was less," said Julien Pain, head of Reporters Without Borders' Internet Freedom Desk. "Now, what is most interesting is the Weblogs in the local languages. You look at what the authorities censor -- they censor content in local languages."
Rights groups have been especially critical of Iran, where there have been some arrests of bloggers. Iran has also blocked some Web sites critical of the government -- even shutting down access to the video-sharing forum YouTube.com, where Iranian opposition groups abroad have posted videos.
I just can’t imagine blogging about controversial issues in a country that could jail me at a moments notice because my comments offended someone. I admire these brave bloggers who risk their lives to further democracy in their countries.
Of course I may be stretching the issue here by saying these bloggers are furthering democracy but the base of democracy in these countries will have to come from a large group of well informed citizens who learn more about how to the change their situation for the better. To some degree there is safety in numbers and as bloggers expose government problems, larger groups of people will hopefully rally around a common cause which will eventually become freely electing their own leaders.
The FMC Border Architecture
April 9, 2007
In 1999 I had an interesting discussion at a Lucent Technologies luncheon with Arun Netravali who then headed up Bell Labs for Lucent Technology. Netravali spoke of the future of communications being an all encompassing communications skin which would have all sorts of devices connected to it.
The idea made sense and wasn’t such a logical leap but at the time it was something that wasn’t really happening. Networks did not interoperate so well with one another. Arun predicted this would happen at around 2025 or so.
Although the concept seemed a bit far off, I decided to write about it in the January and February 2000 issues of Communications Solutions Magazine.
Here we are in 2007 and it seems like to concept of a communications skin is farther away and closer than it ever has been before. It is farther because more and more disparate networks keep popping up such as WiMAX and 3G. It is closer because there is talk of using IMS to unify these disparate networks under a single architecture or framework.
A more tangible and immediate goal in the communications industry is fixed-mobile convergence where users will be able to connect to disparate services over disparate networks in a seamless manner.
While this is an admirable goal, with so many authentication methods, security challenges and networks of various bandwidth levels, it seems FMS is more a journey than a destination.
In a recent conversation with David Hayward the Director of Marketing of ReefPoint Systems he described the FMC environment as the wild west. By that he seemed to imply great opportunity and a lack of laws (which I imagine would be loosely translated into a lack of standards/common architectures.)
Some analysts in fact think the FMC market will soon be worth just shy of a $100 billion dollars and this could be the primary reason ReefPoint recently received an additional $25 million in funding as it is looking to tackle the biggest challenges the FMC space poses.
As service providers explore ways of utilizing, WiFi, WiMAX, picocells and femtocells to augment their network infrastructure there needs to be an architecture of some type enabling border control when supplying services to enterprise customers and consumers.
ReefPoint has introduced their FMC Border Architecture with the hopes of allowing service providers to safely and securely provide multimedia services with a faster time to market.
The FMC Border Architecture addresses the following major IP access networks:
- Unlicensed Mobile Access (UMA) over WiFi
- Picocell/Femtocells
- 3G Mobile (3GPP IMS)
- WiFi
- WiMAX
- DSL/FTTX
- Cable.
The architecture includes three key elements:
- A consolidated, standards-compliant specification of security, QoS and mobility functions required for all major FMC networks (i.e., IP mobile, wireless and fixed-line access networks)
- Categories of functions include:
- User Authorization
- Secure Access
- Firewall
- Network Address Translation
- Denial of Service Attack Prevention
- Traffic Shaping
- Mobility.
- A policy-based definition of session and flow border functions required for service provider to plan their FMC border management rules, including:
- Network Policies
- User Policies
- Application Policies
- Core Policies.
- An FMC implementation reference model including:
- Network deployment topologies for consolidating the FMC border
- FMC network roadmap aiding service provider infrastructure evolution to a single, all-IP core network.
In case you are wondering if this initiative is the same as IP multimedia subsystem or IMS, Michael Khalilian the Chairman and President of the IMS Forum thinks the FMCBA compliments and does not compete with the 3GPP IMS architecture.
The FMCBA is designed as the control point between service providers’ core networks and subscribers’ access networks and it allows the service provider to deploy a comprehensive set of FMC border architecture security, QoS and mobility functions.
Providers know as they provide more services their aggregate offerings become more sticky and drive higher ARPU. The question service providers grapple with is how to add more and more services across disparate networks in a manner in which the complexity level doesn’t cripple the provider’s ability to function.
Carriers worldwide must grapple with how to enable a user to view their place shifted TV programming (similar to TiVo) on a mobile phone and moreover how to allow the mobile device and the home recorder to work seamlessly together.
I asked Hayward for details on what carriers are working with his company to roll this architecture out today. He responded by saying while we are in trials with carriers, we are under nondisclosure and cannot state their names, but here are a few details we can publicly share:
While many carriers are building their “access network agnostic” IMS core over long-term, they are marching to deploy FMC a lot sooner. So in other words, they will likely consolidate the access networks at the edge long before they consolidate their core networks.
We are trialing with major European carriers who each need to deploy a common FMC border control mechanism across 3G, WiFi, WiMAX, fixed-line broadband and PTSN networks. We are also involved with major US carriers who each need to deploy a common border control mechanism for 3G, WiMAX and picocell.
So as Arun predicted, the network of networks which will become tomorrow’s communication skin is going to happen. It seems ReefPoint wants to define the manner in which disparate networks handle authentication, secured access, firewall provisioning, NAT, denial of service protection, traffic shaping and mobility support.
The challenge for service providers is to build an FMC border architecture that will allow for any access network to plug-and-play directly with core networks. Achieving a common border control fabric or skin for all FMC access methods will lower the cost of operating the network and also allows the service provider to realize the full potential of blended services.
Without a common FMC border control fabric, security, QoS mobility and other functions will be deployed piecemeal for each access network. This obviously increases cost and limits service transparency across the various access options.
This is quite an ambitious goal for ReefPoint Systems but without a doubt the concept will resonate with service providers everywhere. The vision of a communications skin is now a step closer and ReefPoint has a starting point to get us to where we know we must all evolve to.
The question is how the other vendors in the market will respond to this initiative? Will they mire it in FUD until they come up with similar solutions or will they band together to come up with a competitive solution.
While the future is not easy to predict we all must realize networks are becoming more complicated and interconnecting said networks is no picnic. A solution such as the FMC Border Architecture makes good sense and is worth exploring.
Dialogic Does Video
April 9, 2007
When it comes to the world of communications, the development world used to revolve around Dialogic. Ten years ago you virtually had to buy a DSP resource board from this company or one of its smaller competitors if you wanted to develop an application such as unified messaging, voicemail, IVR, speech, recognition, ACD or just anything else.
In fact for a number of years VoIP gateways were sold almost exclusively based on DSP resource boards. Larger telecom equipment providers would repackage systems with these boards through an integrator and claim the resulting gateways as their own.
I have taken many plant tours at industrial computer companies where I had to promise not to disclose the logos I saw throughout the plant. These were typically gateways under construction with boards from NMS or Dialogic.
In the late nineties while Dialogic was enjoying a nice time atop the enabling technology perch, the company received an offer from Intel it just couldn’t refuse. The processor king had the hope of integrating Dialogic’s core technology with Intel processors allowing HMP solutions which were optimized for Intel’s chips. In addition, Dialogic played a nice role as part of a growing communications division within Intel.
Last summer Dialogic was spun back out of Intel and was purchased by Eicon Networks who subsequently changed the name of the combined company to Dialogic.
The announcement was a source of major buzz at TMC’s VoIP Developer Conference – now called Communications Developer. I was in a standing room only session as the news was presented to the anxious developers.
A great deal has changed over the years and perhaps most importantly you can now develop applications without the need for DSP resource boards.
VoIP has changed the way the communications development market works and now you can build voice applications without DSP resource boards or even HMP-based solutions.
But while voice development has become somewhat easier and less expensive to accomplish, video is still a different world and video developers still have to grapple with processor intensive applications which benefit from fixed function hardware and DSP resource boards.
It may be for this reason Dialogic’s CEO Nick Jensen is so passionate about video. In my frequent conversations with Nick, he exudes excitement as he talks about the opportunity in video. It isn’t TV over the Internet that excites Nick but bidirectional video streaming.
For this reason I decided to set up a formal conference call with Dialogic’s charismatic leader about his passion and while he spoke I took copious notes so I could share them with you. Nick tell me 2G phones were used to send videos and pictures but 3G will take advantage of live video for gaming, video gaming and ringtones. He goes on to say that Singapore and Japan are way ahead in these areas and Europe is catching up. The US is behind this curve still but will catch up eventually.
The way Nick sees it, video ringback tones will be hosted by a company for a fee and the videos will play based on the Caller ID of a caller. He sees the teen and consumer markets as the drivers for this sort of service.
From there his vision is that video greetings will become popular. He sees a world where a person – let’s say a high-value customer – will be greeted with a customized voice or video greeting when they call. This is a way to make customers feel more welcome and indeed this is similar in concept to having a gracious host or hostess seat you at a restaurant.
He also sees video playing an important role in the future of dating and social networking sites. Moreover in the video space he sees the need for certain games such as poker, bridge and chess to have video support as people playing these games want to see each other.
He also sees a potential for video rooms on auction sites where you can see other bidders. In online virtual auction houses you will be able to simulate a live auction experience. Obviously there was some discussion here about the Skype acquisition by eBay.
Nick also believes the enterprise space will see video adoption and voice and speech applications will be upgraded to support video.
From there we went off on a tangent focusing on standards and how they need to be there to allow video calls to be seamlessly transferred across networks. We talked about demand and what the drivers will be for video technology.
In the US, carriers seem to wait to see what is popular in Asia and Europe before they start to roll it our here. SMS and ringtones are huge moneymakers which the US adopted after seeing the rest of the world eat these services up.
Nick wonders if we will once again let Asia take the lead and catch up at some point in the future. This would really be a shame as so much of the technology enabling next generation calling is developed in the US.
Nick gave an example of video in a typical office application… Taking the video minutes of a meeting where you can go back and see who was assigned what and why and by whom and when. Certainly this makes sense from an accountability standpoint. The argument against such technology is probably that no one wants to be recorded. Then again, no one wants to have their presence tracked or work on e-mail at night or on weekends – but this is another story.
Another note on video – Nick thinks people will want to work for companies who use video in this fashion and throw out the notion of synchronizing meeting minutes with one another. So he even sees video as a way to attract and retain talent!
Now I am not sure if Jensen is a betting man but he did wager $1,000 that enterprise video adoption as outlined above will be happen in the next two years – especially in financial firms. So far, I haven’t taken the bet but you can contact him directly if you are of the wagering type.
He thinks video can be a big driver of communications technology for the next five to ten years and suggested there needs to be a new ecosystem where his current competitors will work together with Dialogic to enable a new wave of industry growth like we saw during the days of CTI.
Jensen mentioned the industry hasn’t been too receptive to this idea and he thinks it is a shame. I mentioned the “bad blood” from years past in this market.
Nick makes the point he is not part of the old history and he thinks it is in the best interest of all the building block companies to work with one another. He says if companies do not work together then each solution becomes proprietary. He further points out companies need multiple suppliers – so no one company can’t do it all themselves.
So is Nick right? The answer is probably. For the past six years or more I have been writing and speaking about the fact that video conferencing will take off when mobile devices can do it seamlessly.
In this Internet Telephony Magazine Publisher’s Outlook back in May 2003 I said:
Let’s face it, video conferencing has been “right around the corner” for 15 years. But we may finally really be there. IP telephony reduces the cost of video conferencing and better yet, cameras are being embedded in tablets and PDAs. Finally, most of what we want to show others isn’t at our desks anyway so it makes sense that mobile computing will be the driver for video conferencing. I firmly believe that we will see a merging of consumer electronic video equipment with WiFi networks resulting in video conferences on-the-fly from theme parks and other WiFi-enabled locations. You will eventually be able to broadcast to your family members live from Disneyland.
The point is, when you are mobile you have things worth showing. A foreign airport, a theme park, a skyline, sunset, sunrise, animals, everything and anything. In fact I wrote a bit more about mobile video opportunities a few weeks back. In this past article I touched on video touring as another area of potential growth.
Nick thinks in about six months, Dialogic will be even further along in video – he even used the term “major player” in providing video building blocks to companies who in turn will be building tomorrow’s leading edge video applications. It just so happens Nick will be keynoting Internet Telephony Conference & Expo in Los Angeles in about five months. I invite you to register now for this event which takes place Sept 10-12 and make sure you are there to listen to Nick’s evolving vision of the video opportunity in communications.
VoIP Patent Mess
April 9, 2007
Daniel Berninger at GigaOM has a good summary of the VoIP patent mess worth reading. Dan thinks the Verizon patents are overly broad and goes on to explain more about the future of patents. Unfortunately he also points out that although the patent system is improving it may be too late to help the VoIP industry today.
Technorati
Del.icio.us
BoingBoing
Slashdot
Digg
Spurl
Furl