Somehow, don't ask me why, I am hooked on learning about 802.3ah, an IEEE standard for deploying broadband over copper. I have written about 802.3ah before but I never really had an in-depth understanding of it until recently. By the way, 802.3ah is also referred to as Ethernet in the First Mile or EFM (yes, we desperately needed another protocol, standard and especially another acronym in telecom!)
There are a few reasons why this standard makes sense for service providers to roll out. First of all Ethernet in my opinion is the future of broadband. T1, E1, T3, DSL, etc will fade quickly as Ethernet becomes the standard broadband technology we will all use. 802.3 supports Ethernet.
Furthermore, fiber is in short supply. If you were a financial TV watcher in post-buble months, all they talked about was the excess of fiber. When you have financial people acting like experts in areas like optical, you confuse the public. We have tremendous amounts of fiber in the ground, just not going to office buildings where it is needed. If you have fiber in your office, you are in the lucky 10-20% minority. Our office is in
But I digress and need to come back to my point which is this 802.3ah stuff is great. It allows service providers to deliver metro Ethernet services at a fraction of the cost of DSL and ATM technology.
802.3ah comes in two flavors, the longer range 2BASE-TL can reach distances of 20,000 feet and greater while the shorter range 10PASS-TS is meant for high-speed broadband deployment and FTTC deployment.
In contrast to 10PASS-TS, 2BASE-TL is designed for delivering symmetrical services from a central office to a business with a maximum delivery rate per pair of 5.7 Mbps and the ability to bond up to 32 pairs into an Ethernet port. Although I haven't seen seen a single app with this sort of bandwidth requirement, this allows a theoretical 182 Mbps! Nice. If I could get that at TMC and pay a few thousand a month, we have a deal. Any takers?
What is it?
In telecom, everything new is old again or the other way around which is why EFM technology leverages existing DSL layers. The good news here is that the technology is new but able to use current DSL chips, etc meaning costs aren’t as high as a radically new technology. One last point is that EFM is more immune from signal interference from voice T1s and other "disturbers," meaning the line will be effectively cleaner than DSL and more suitable for business.
UNE-P
EFM technology doesn't need UNE-P like a traditional T1 and as such will work with UNE-L or dry copper. This is great in a world being cleansed on UNE-P.
Hatteras Networks is a company I met with recently and they were nice enough to show me a demo of their EFM products in action. They have a series of boxes from point to point to point to multipoint allowing a service provider to dabble before he or she commits to the larger solution. Their products are the HN400 and HN4000 series Metro Ethernet Copper Access Switches. Business is good for them right now. They have found a good niche. One area of growth for example is service providers supplying broadband to WiFi hotspots and more recently WiMAX towers. EFM technology is not really too well known and I am not sure why. It seems like a great solution for companies with fiber taste and a copper zip code.
3g 4g android apple asterisk at&t att broadband call center cisco communications conference consumer electronics crm expo facebook fcc gadget google ims ip communications ipad iphone ipod itexpo microsoft Microsoft sip skype social networking technology tmc tmcnet unified communications verizon video voip wifi wireless yahoo
- 4G (1004)
- AT&T (1366)
- Amazon (105)
- Android (163)
- Apple (1378)
- Avaya (545)
- Blackberry (720)
- CES (17)
- Call Center (1146)
- Cisco (797)
- Cloud Computing (128)
- Communications Developer (648)
- Conference (367)
- Consumer Electronics (1882)
- E-Commerce (642)
- FCC (1185)
- Facebook (253)
- Fax (346)
- Financial (581)
- Gadget (981)
- Google (1251)
- Green (300)
- HD Voice (224)
- HTML5 (46)
- IP Communications (2929)
- M2M (127)
- MSP (2)
- MWC (26)
- Marketing (40)
- Merger/Acquisition (277)
- Microsoft (1375)
- Musings (84)
- Networking (68)
- Nortel (486)
- Optical (192)
- Patent (207)
- Personal (280)
- Podcast (104)
- Political (45)
- SaaS (228)
- Samsung (4)
- Satellite (115)
- Science (279)
- Search (202)
- Security (596)
- Smart Ecosystem (126)
- Smart Grid (144)
- Social Networking (672)
- Software Telco (4)
- Super WiFi (23)
- TMC Team (185)
- TMC Video (103)
- TMCnet (66)
- Technology (3854)
- Twitter (161)
- Ultrabook (22)
- Unified Communications (1499)
- Verizon (1146)
- Video (1320)
- Virtual Worlds (174)
- VoIP (3520)
- Vonage (408)
- Wearable Tech (1)
- WebRTC (9)
- Yahoo (354)
- iPad (70)
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004






