I received this release today and it details some of the reasons Detroit’s automakers are in trouble. It is difficult to disagree with any of this. Friends often tell me that domestic cars are cheaper and have better incentives but who wants a domestic car? Obviously this isn’t too positive for Detroit and they better wake up quickly if they want to be around to supply cars for the next generation.

40MPG.ORG: GM, FORD JUNK BONDS SHOULD BE CALLED “YAEGASHI BONDS” TO RECOGNIZE LAGGING U.S. AUTO LEADERSHIP

Why New Debt From Ford, GM Should Be Named for a Japanese Engineer;
Poll:  63% of Americans Already Worry About U.S/Japanese “Hybrid Tech Gap.”

WASHINGTON, D.C.///May 9, 2005///Now that the Standard & Poor’s rating agency has downgraded the General Motors Corporation and Ford Motor Co. to junk bond status, Wall Street should take the next logical step and refer to any such new debt issued by the struggling U.S. automakers as “Yaegashi bonds,” according to 40mpg.org, a Web-based campaign organized by the Results for America arm of the nonprofit Civil Society Institute (CSI) to promote higher fuel-efficiency standards for U.S. vehicles.

Why “Yaegashi bonds”?  The little-known Takehisa Yaegashi is the Toyota engineer who is referred to in Japan as “the father of the hybrid.”   Part of Yaegashi’s training took place in the United States where he realized that passage by U.S. lawmakers of limits on automotive tailpipe emissions would require cleaner, more fuel-efficient autos.  The story of Yaegashi’s role in hybrids and the broader problem of the short-sighted thinking of U.S. automakers was spelled out more than a year ago in a prescient April 2004 MIT Technology Review article (“Hybrid’s Rising Sun”) by author Peter Fairley. 

Civil Society Institute  President Pam Solo said:  “The reason that Japan has at least a six-year lead today on red-hot hybrid auto technology is because people like Yaegashi saw the handwriting on the wall more than 30 years ago and set out to do something about it.   Japanese automakers built their pickups and SUVs just like U.S. automakers, but they also hedged their bets by focusing on fuel efficiency in a way that the U.S. companies did not.   Hybrids are not necessarily yet a major factor in what ails Ford and GM today, but the Japanese leadership in hybrids reflects everything that is wrong at U.S. automakers.”

Solo added:  “Detroit can try to blame things on short-term gasoline prices or a downturn in the U.S. economy, but this is actually a much more deeply rooted problem that goes back more than three decades.  It’s not that the Japanese had an unfair advantage here or just that they were smart when U.S. companies unwisely rested on their laurels.  Instead, Japanese automakers simply acted the way that U.S automakers used to act when they were intent on maintaining the edge in sales, jobs and technology.  U.S. leadership in the global auto industry used to be Job #1, but today U.S. car companies are in real danger of getting the pink slip from consumers.”

According to a 40mpg.org national opinion survey released on March 17, 2005, more than three out of five Americans (63 percent) think the "hybrid technology gap" -  in which U.S. automakers will fall further behind Japanese and other foreign automakers that have more fully embraced the new fuel-efficient technology – is a serious or somewhat of a problem. The extent of this concern among Americans is essentially bipartisan, including conservatives (60 percent), moderates (70 percent) and liberals (69 percent).  Similarly, the concern about the hybrid technology gap is shared by 58 percent of NASCAR fans and 65 percent of car/truck/new technology enthusiasts.

The April 2004 MIT Technology Review article telling the story of Yaegashi reads in part as follows:  “The Hirose plant is off-limits to journalists, but the story of Toyota's program is one that its architect-Takehisa Yaegashi, the unassuming engineer revered within Toyota as ‘the father of the hybrid’-is eager to tell. Drinking black coffee in a nondescript meeting room in Toyota's offices in Tokyo, Yaegashi traces the origins of Toyota's hybrid strategy back to the early 1970s, when the U.S. Congress set the first national limits on tailpipe emissions.

In 1971, Yaegashi was a 28-year-old mechanical engineer, two years out of Hokkaido University, when Toyota assigned him to its new clean-engine project. Over the next 20 years, he designed everything from exhaust-scrubbing catalytic converters to emission-reducing engine control systems. All this helped make Toyota's fleet of cars one of the cleanest sold in the United States … But Toyota didn't stop at innovative catalytic converters. By the early 1990s-even as Toyota followed the lead of U.S. automakers by making popular but fuel-guzzling SUVs-Toyota's leaders prepared to redouble their efforts to clean up the automobile and make it more fuel-efficient. ‘We saw two things happening at the same time: demand for cleaner air and demand for greater fuel savings,’ recalls Yaegashi.”

The entire text of the Review article is available online at http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/04/04/fairley0404.asp?p=1.

ABOUT WWW.40MPG.ORG

The 40mpg.org campaign and Results For America/Civil Society Institute have no direct or indirect ties to any automakers in the United States or elsewhere around the world. 

Launched on March 17, 2004, the new http://www.40mpg.org Web site features a calculator that allows visitors to plug in estimates for their current vehicle's fuel efficiency level, a typical price paid for gasoline in recent weeks, and total number of miles driven per year. For example, a driver who gets 17 miles to the gallon, pays \$2 a gallon for gasoline and drives 25,000 miles per year, could achieve the following each year by switching to a 40 mpg vehicle: save \$1,691.18 at the gas pump; require 845 fewer gallons of gasoline from Middle East oil; and cut personal air pollution by 16,912 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

The 40mpg.org Web site also permits visitors to: join a community of other people who own their vehicle make/model; compare and contrast one vehicle's fuel-efficiency ratings with those of others; monitor how individual members of Congress weighed in on the most recent fuel-efficiency standard votes; contact automakers to speak out in favor of more fuel-efficient vehicles; and send a letter to the editor of a local newspaper urging the adoption of a 40 mpg fuel-efficiency standard. Visitors who sign up at the 40mpg.org Web site will be contacted in the future to urge lawmakers and automakers to take action.

Results For America is a project of the Civil Society Institute, which is based in Newton, Massachusetts. The mission of CSI is to serve as a catalyst for change by creating problem-solving interactions among people, and between communities, government and business, that can help to improve society.  RFA seeks to shape and tap the tremendous amount of community-level knowledge, experience and innovative action that could solve America's problems in four key areas, including: energy policy. In this context, Results For America states: "Our national energy policy poses a growing threat to our health, to our economy and even to our national security ... Our oil imports make us more vulnerable to terrorists and give us less room to maneuver in our foreign policy. Our failure to develop the next generation of energy technology costs our nation well-paying jobs. The Results for America environmental initiative is designed to focus attention on the dangers of current US energy and environmental policies and to put real solutions front and center."

CONTACT: Ailis Aaron, (703) 276-3265 or aaaron@hastingsgroup.com.