Is Ajax Our Future?

A lot of buzz is being generated by Adaptive Path, the company that invented the acronym Ajax to describe what could become the key technology that allows web-based software to overtake traditional desktop software in the long run. The implications for companies like Microsoft could be huge if the tremendous interest in this technology continues.

Figure 1: The traditional model for web applications (left) compared to the Ajax model (right).

As you can see in this diagram an Ajax engine acts as middleware (has anyone told IBM about this?) allowing you to speed up the time it takes to display images and perform other tasks via a web browser. What is really holding up the adoption of 100% web-based software is that the time to display images on your computer and perform other tasks over the web is longer than we are used to. The Ajax model is not brand new but the acronym is and the way most web programmers think will have to change to adapt to this concept.

Figure 2: The synchronous interaction pattern of a traditional web application (top) compared with the asynchronous pattern of an Ajax application (bottom).

You can see that by eliminating the need to go to the server on every request, you are able to significantly speed up the user experience and response to user input. The use of a single acronym AJAX in fact has the ability to change the way we think about programming.

It gives developers something to rally around. A new way of looking at programming online. A n ew way of providing web services.

So you may be thinking, why should I care about some arcane acronym that stands for “Asynchronous JavaScript+CSS+DOM+XMLHttpRequest.” The reason is because this is the technology that Google is using to develop some really interesting applications.

I spent 10 minutes today fascinated by Google Maps. It is the best application I have ever seen on the web because of the amazing graphics and the response time. Don’t get me wrong. This is not as fast as a desktop application but it is still faster than other web apps I have used.

You may be thinking that Flash can do much of what AJAX can and you are right. There will be times that one may be better suited to a job at hand than another. A technology called Flickr uses both. Here is a site that uses Ajax and it is amazingly quick. You would swear it was a desktop application.

In my opinion the birth of this new acronym may give programmers something to rally around and users will love the amazing graphics that Ajax based programs will provide. I can’t see a down-side to enabling web based applications that are faster, more responsive and attractive. I just wonder when the Ajax versions of Word and Excel are coming.

The opinions and views expressed in comments, blogs, etc. are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of TMC, TMCnet, or its editors. TMCnet reserves the right to edit, delete, or otherwise make changes to the content that appears on these pages at its own discretion and as it deems necessary.

March 18, 2005 7:36 PM |

5 Comments | 2 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to sites that reference Is Ajax Our Future?:

Is Ajax Our Future? TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1874

Microsoft Virtual Earth from VoIP Blog - Rich Tehrani on August 1, 2005 7:52 AM

If there is one area of technology where Microsoft and Google can be compared objectively it is in mapping. It is unglamorous, doesn't generate much revenue for either company and both companies have relatively new entries into this space. So... Read More

A Breakthrough Month in IP Communications from VoIP Blog - Tehrani.com on February 26, 2007 8:53 AM

Skype, Google, Verizon, Vonage and Other Happenings Please enjoy the March 2007 Publisher’s Outlook from Internet Telephony Magazine: The last few weeks have been among the most newsworthy in IP communications since this magazine&rs... Read More

5 Comments

Andrew Hansen | March 18, 2005 8:41 PM | Reply

I had this very same epiphany last week. I started asking the supposed "learned" about this Ajax thing, no one knew what I was talking about. The second I saw google maps - my jaw dropped.

http post/request seems like Fred Flinstones foot powered car next to the tripped out H2 that is xmlhttp.

It is without a doubt the future of the web.

Rich Tehrani | March 18, 2005 10:25 PM | Reply

This is a really interesting site as well(http://www.panic.com/goods/). the implications are amazing. Drag and drop web design interfaces that are really slick can't be far behind

Peter Bromberg | March 27, 2005 2:44 PM | Reply

This is "New"? XMLHTTP has been built into Internet Explorer since version 3.0, and the first "big" implementation of it was Outlook Web Access, written by the Microsoft Exchange team.

It's nice to see that the Mozilla / Firefox people have finally gotten around to including it in their browsers, but frankly, they've really shot themselves in the foot. You can't even make an XMLHTTPRequest in Firefox for a lousy RSS feed if its not in the same domain the page came from.

Acronymns abound. They really don't mean much unless there is really some new, innovative technology behind them. In this case, not.

Rich Tehrani | March 27, 2005 4:31 PM | Reply

You may be 100% right as the buzz about Ajax seems to have already slowed down. I did some searches on Ajax news and didn't find much. Still I think Ajax is a better name than XMLHTTP or whatever other acronyms people used to use. Sometimes a name is more important than we give it credit for. WiFi is a better name for example than 802.11x.

In order for Ajax to become popular, we will have to see lots of really interesting web apps that use this technology in new and innovative ways. This in turn will spur imitators.

mark | October 5, 2005 9:13 AM | Reply

If you are interested in Ajax maybe you would like:

Panoramio.com

Name

Email Address

URL

Remember personal info?

Comments (You may use HTML tags for style)

Notify me of new comments?

Today

Rich Tehrani tweeted, "RT @MobileMartyr: Apple Grabs 25% of the Smartphone Market, Android Doubles Market Share http://ow.ly/15DeJ @purpleforge" 2010-02-09T21:14:42Z 2010-02-09T21:14:42Z
Rich Tehrani tweeted, "comScore Reports December 2009 U.S. Mobile Subscriber Market Share http://post.ly/N1M8" 2010-02-09T21:13:51Z 2010-02-09T21:13:51Z
Rich Tehrani tweeted, "RT @VonReventlow: iPad -- Evolution or Revolution?: The pendulum is swinging back toward the author and the iPad is ... http://bit.ly/bJ ..." 2010-02-09T21:12:49Z 2010-02-09T21:12:49Z
Rich Tehrani tweeted, "The Cost of a $499 iPad: $290 http://post.ly/N0ac" 2010-02-09T19:41:25Z 2010-02-09T19:41:25Z
Rich Tehrani tweeted, "Yahoo developing "Search via SMS"? | VentureBeat http://post.ly/N0WA" 2010-02-09T19:32:48Z 2010-02-09T19:32:48Z
Rich Tehrani tweeted, "iPhone 4G: Rumored Parts Suggest a Slightly New Design http://post.ly/N0Oy" 2010-02-09T19:20:26Z 2010-02-09T19:20:26Z
Rich Tehrani tweeted, "RT @Scobleizer: Yes, it's called "Google Buzz" and will be live at 11 a.m. Pacific at http://buzz.google.com . http://www.youtube.com/fe ..." 2010-02-09T19:11:03Z 2010-02-09T19:11:03Z
Rich Tehrani tweeted, "DotNetNuke Scores Another $8 Million In Series B Funding http://post.ly/N0If" 2010-02-09T19:10:31Z 2010-02-09T19:10:31Z

More...

judy: worst bed I ever purchased. more back pain than ever, read more
Peter Radizeski: They may have good handsets but their network leaves a read more
James May: I have a sleep number, and I love it. The read more
Mike Ross: I love your comments especially: Speed: It is better to read more
Rich Tehrani: Thanks Bill, we try :-) Without a doubt I believe read more
Rich Tehrani: You will -- we will do it again -- demand read more
Bill Kelly: Nice write up on the tech trade show industry and read more
xmlscott: Neither you nor the original post have gone to the read more
roderickm: The Startup Camp:Telephony session was the highlight of ITExpo for read more
Rich Tehrani: You are right that Obama has not advocated equal distribution read more