Advertising 2.0: What it Shouldn’t Be

The internet has evolved to a point where there is almost no information you can’t find about someone if you really want it. Enter a phone number in some search engines for example and you can get a home address.
 
Over the years there have been many advances in technology which over time have raised concern by privacy advocates. Toolbars which track websites a user visits -- like those supplied by Alexa (now a division of Amazon), scared some in the nineties. A few years back, fears were raised when Google announced their new Gmail e-mail service would have the company’s computers “read” e-mails and match ads based on keywords in a message.
 
The latest privacy controversy has to do with social networking and in particular, Facebook. The massively popular service has in fact recently started to allow purchases by users to be shared with other users on the network via something called Beacon. Moreover, advertisers can supply messages which can be disseminated with the purchase information of others in a person’s network.
 
At first blush, this is a logical way for Facebook to make money. The controversy surrounding this practice stems from the service being defaulted to the on position and what some would say is not enough notification that purchases will be shared with others.
 
The concerns many people raise is that some of their purchases may be personal and as such a user may not want this information shared.
 
What are some of the solutions to this dilemma?
 
1)      Have Beacon default to off.
2)      Allow each purchase to be shared on an individual basis.
3)      Have a recommendation engine which tries to distinguish what someone may want to buy based on not only their friends in the network but others with similar tastes and backgrounds
 
 
Another idea which comes to mind is to anonymously alert a user that one of their friends has purchased something. The problem here is, it may be easy to deduce who in your network made the purchase. Number 3 above seems to be the best way to achieve the spirit of this idea.
 
I commend Facebook on trying something new and perhaps inventing “Advertising 2.0” but Beacon needs improvement and if the company doesn’t make some adjustments soon I fear a privacy backlash against many other internet companies as well.
 
See also:

TMCnet:
 
 
 
| 1 Comment | 0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to sites that reference Advertising 2.0: What it Shouldn’t Be:

0 TrackBacks

Advertising 2.0: What it Shouldn’t Be TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/34138

1 Comment

I also commend Facebook on what they are trying to do, but I am also concerned regarding how this new model invades my personal privacy even more. I provide more detail on that topic here: www.realtea.net/perfectly_targeted_advertising.

As an experiment, I am also placing more data about myself online, in an attempt to exercise more control over what information there is about me in the public domain and to create a system where the individual can choose how markets to them and how - www.realtea.net/too_much_info

Leave comment to Advertising 2.0: What it Shouldn’t Be article

Subscribe to Blog

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Rich Tehrani published on November 22, 2007 9:38 AM.

Re-Kindle was the previous entry in this blog.

Why Verizon Sued Vonage is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Yearly Archives

'04 '05 '06 '07 '08
  Jan Jan Jan Jan
  Feb Feb Feb Feb
  Mar Mar Mar Mar
Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr
May May May May May
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun
Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul
Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug
Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep
Oct Oct Oct Oct  
Nov Nov Nov Nov  
Dec Dec Dec Dec  

Around TMCnet Blogs

Latest Whitepapers