Challenge-response technology has been around for awhile and it is one solution to block spam. I sent an e-mail to someone yesterday in response to a press release they sent me. In response I received a challenge e-mail. This e-mail requested I respond to the e-mail to make sure the sender knows I am a real person and not an automated spam blaster. I did respond.
But of course the funny thing is that the sender sent me the first e-mail so my address should have been in their “good” list to begin with.
I found it quite ironic that while I was going through my spam folder today, I noticed an e-mail in the box saying I am now allowed to send e-mail to this person.
The concept of a spam folder is intriguing as I still have to check it. I spend at least 45 minutes each day checking this folder and I have many rules to not only ensure bad e-mail goes into this folder but rules to make sure good e-mail goes back into my inbox. I have other rules that permanently delete e-mail.
I recently wrote about Goodmail’s CertifiedEmail system. I hope systems like this enable us to reduce the torrent of spam messages we all receive.
Most importantly I hope technology gets us to the point where we don’t have to worry about having a crucial e-mail getting deleted accidentally. If we ever solve the spam problem I imagine world productivity will increase nicely. E-mail as a delivery system not only delivers spam but viruses and worms which also zap productivity.
Sender Verification Goes Mainstream
Listed below are links to sites that reference Sender Verification Goes Mainstream:
0 TrackBacks
Sender Verification Goes Mainstream TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/19295
5 Comments
Leave comment to Sender Verification Goes Mainstream article
Recent Entries
- ZeeVee's Localcasting Solution Merges Internet, TV
- Fring on iPhone Mini Review
- UMPCs Selling Strong
- Kontron Acquires Intel Communications Server Assets
- Apple's Developer Can of Worms
- AudioCodes a Barometer of Communications Markets?
- MicroThoughts on MicroBlogging
- Verizon Loses VoIP Patent Case: Justice Served?
- WiMAX World 2008 Update
- Asterisk World Comes to ITEXPO
Recent Comments
- Steve commented on Sender Verification Goes Mainstream: How exactl
- Ken commented on Sender Verification Goes Mainstream: One idea w
- Rich Tehrani commented on Sender Verification Goes Mainstream: Great poin
- telephone verification guy commented on Sender Verification Goes Mainstream: The proble
- Alan Gahtan commented on Sender Verification Goes Mainstream: I like the
Categories
- AT&T (335)
- Apple (360)
- Avaya (163)
- Blackberry (129)
- Call Center (639)
- Cisco (349)
- Communications Developer (115)
- Conference (75)
- Consumer Electronics (823)
- E-Commerce (139)
- FCC (490)
- Fax (46)
- Financial (34)
- Gadget (64)
- Google (536)
- Green (117)
- IP Communications (1422)
- Merger/Acquisition (70)
- Microsoft (685)
- Musings (39)
- Nortel (144)
- Optical (23)
- Patent (119)
- Personal (176)
- Podcast (62)
- SaaS (36)
- Science (197)
- Search (31)
- Security (367)
- Social Networking (64)
- TMC Team (54)
- TMC Video (26)
- TMCnet (31)
- Technology (1790)
- Unified Communications (627)
- Verizon (255)
- Video (725)
- Virtual Worlds (50)
- VoIP (2605)
- Vonage (210)
- Yahoo (128)
Subscribe to Blog
October 2008
Sign In
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Rich Tehrani published on November 6, 2005 12:40 PM.
VoIP Business Opportunity was the previous entry in this blog.
Skype Continues Rapid Growth is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Yearly Archives
| '04 | '05 | '06 | '07 | '08 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Jan | Jan | Jan | |
| Feb | Feb | Feb | Feb | |
| Mar | Mar | Mar | Mar | |
| Apr | Apr | Apr | Apr | Apr |
| May | May | May | May | May |
| Jun | Jun | Jun | Jun | Jun |
| Jul | Jul | Jul | Jul | Jul |
| Aug | Aug | Aug | Aug | Aug |
| Sep | Sep | Sep | Sep | Sep |
| Oct | Oct | Oct | Oct | Oct |
| Nov | Nov | Nov | Nov | |
| Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec |
Around TMCnet Blogs
Communications and Technology Blog - Tehrani.com:
Which Web 2.0 Companies Are in Trouble?First Coffee:
CRM for IDOX, Neolane's Marketing Automation, SugarCRM Webcast, Agresso and Sabre, WebaloGreg Galitzine's VoIP Authority Blog:
TelcoBridges at WiMAX WorldVoIP & Gadgets Blog:
Ultimate Ears -- Very Sweet ...Communications and Technology Blog - Tehrani.com:
Avatars: The Cursor in Communications 2.0First Coffee:
CRM Training for Infusionsoft, OneSource in Europe, StrongMail and Marketo, Griffin and ReachForce, Kintera Support, NetSuiteGreg Galitzine's VoIP Authority Blog:
Nokia: Out of UC, In with Touch-Screen PhoneVoIP & Gadgets Blog:
Triple Play Moving to Quintuple Play?Latest Whitepapers
Technology Marketing Corporation,
One Technology Plaza, Norwalk, CT 06854 USA
Ph: 800-243-6002, 203-852-6800; Fx: 203-853-2845
General comments: tmc@tmcnet.com.
Comments about this site: webmaster@tmcnet.com.
About | Contact | Advertise
Technology Marketing Corp. 1997-2008
Copyright | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
One Technology Plaza, Norwalk, CT 06854 USA
Ph: 800-243-6002, 203-852-6800; Fx: 203-853-2845
General comments: tmc@tmcnet.com.
Comments about this site: webmaster@tmcnet.com.
About | Contact | Advertise
Technology Marketing Corp. 1997-2008
Copyright | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Visit the Communities:
Visit the Channels:



Technorati
Del.icio.us
Slashdot
Digg
I like the concept but this vendor's product appears to be a proprietary implementation, not one based on an open standard. Also, their solution looks suitable for very large companies or very small ones (that utilize a large ISP for email), but not very suitable for smaller and medium sized businesses (particularly ones using a hosted exchange infrastructure).
The problem of spam will never be solved as it is a social phenomenon, not technical. If people spend money on spam advertising (give money to advertisers) spam will remain.
Great point. How do we stop people from clicking on spam messages?
One idea would be to change all email software and web mail so that links can't be simply clicked on to open a webpage. If a user had to copy-paste links into their browser, unless they were from someone on their friends list (or a known valid company using challenge/response email) This would I feel reduce the response rate for people sending junk mail by at least 95%
How exactly would your idea work Ken? I would assume that the email address on screen would have to be encoded to prevent these being picked up by spam bots and such. Which by the way is what most webmasters do anyway. Besides if an email address is already known how will this stop someone sending email to it? You would have to have some form of verification contained within the email that matches up with a value/string on your local machine, i.e. they cannot send you an email unless they know this value/string. Still it seems that what you suggest we already implement, unless i'm missing something, I just don't see the difference?! Could you please explain further