Like any good computer Samaritan I do all I can to avoid having my computer taken over and used in denial of service attack or to send volumes of spam messages on behalf of those malicious people who benefit from both of these activities.
I think I am well protected. My corporate virus scanner catches e-mail threats such as executable files sent via e-mail that could cause damage if clicked on. I have an anti-spyware program that updates regularly and scans constantly. I occasionally run anti-adware programs to stop malicious programs from monitoring websites I visit and possibly steal passwords I type in.
I also subscribe to the Microsoft Windows Update program and every night my computer checks for updates and installs them automatically.
In addition I scan through volumes of e-mail, the majority of which is spam and malicious content designed to steal passwords and/or my identity.
If all this wasn't enough of a productivity drain, I have noticed a new and more annoying problem that is zapping corporate productivity. Often when I come to work in the morning my computer has automatically rebooted after a Windows Update of high priority was installed on my computer.
The problem is that I often leave documents open on my desktop with the intent of getting to them later. Perhaps later in the day or the next day. I don't always keep a record of these documents and if the thing I am working on is not critical I don't even save it as my office doesn't lose power often enough for me to worry about it.
Lately the Microsoft Windows Update program has taken control of my computer and rebooted it at least a few time in the past few months. TMCnet's webmaster Robert Hashemian has also mentioned to me the same thing has happened to him.
This leads one to wonder how much productivity damage is really being done by malicious programs and the people who invent and intentionally propagate them. The soft loss of productivity -- thousands or hundreds of thousands of people losing their work is possibly as bad as getting a virus in the first place. One hopes stories like this help the powers that be build better operating systems that aren't as vulnerable to attack in the first place.
When trying to ascertain the true value of malicious programs one needs to make sure to count the soft losses as well as the more easily trackable ones.
The Real Hacker Damage
Categories:
Tags:
- hacker,
- microsoft,
- phishing,
- spam,
- virus Related Tags: windows update, malicious programs, computer, malicious, programs, productivity
- Related Entries to The Real Hacker Damage
- ICE - Nov 11, 2005
- LooksToGoodToBeTrue - Nov 09, 2005
- Malicious Gadgets - Aug 07, 2008
- Preparing For Cyber Attacks - Jul 17, 2008
- Major Spanish Hackers in Jail - May 19, 2008
- Half a Million Hacked Websites - Apr 26, 2008
- PayPal and Phishing - Apr 21, 2008
- Vishing: Definition - Jan 24, 2008
- WiFi Hotspots Still Not Secure - Jan 16, 2008
- Protecting IMS/UMA and IP Communications - Oct 03, 2006
Listed below are links to sites that reference The Real Hacker Damage:
0 TrackBacks
The Real Hacker Damage TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/22011
2 Comments
Leave comment to The Real Hacker Damage article
Recent Entries
- Adobe Buzzword... On the Path to a Yahoo Merger?
- Communications, Speech Markets Have Positive Outlook
- Almost in NY
- How Social Networking is Transforming Politics
- Heading to SpeechTek
- Voice Mashups And Your Communications Future
- Open Source Communications War
- Iwatsu Update
- Scenes of New England
- Traveling Today to Boston
Recent Comments
- Tom Keating commented on The Real Hacker Damage: Or you can
- Dan York commented on The Real Hacker Damage: Rich, I k
Categories
- AT&T (259)
- Apple (308)
- Avaya (105)
- Blackberry (86)
- Call Center (583)
- Cisco (293)
- Communications Developer (63)
- Conference (44)
- Consumer Electronics (767)
- E-Commerce (104)
- FCC (440)
- Fax (11)
- Financial (12)
- Gadget (33)
- Google (490)
- Green (102)
- IP Communications (1304)
- Merger/Acquisition (38)
- Microsoft (618)
- Musings (32)
- Nortel (105)
- Optical (8)
- Patent (104)
- Personal (168)
- Podcast (53)
- SaaS (18)
- Science (184)
- Search (19)
- Security (346)
- Social Networking (35)
- TMC Team (47)
- TMC Video (24)
- TMCnet (24)
- Technology (1692)
- Unified Communications (568)
- Verizon (203)
- Video (671)
- Virtual Worlds (30)
- VoIP (2535)
- Vonage (185)
- Yahoo (103)
Subscribe to Blog
August 2008
Sign In
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Rich Tehrani published on January 9, 2006 7:53 PM.
Trumping Alex was the previous entry in this blog.
Make Money in VoIP is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Yearly Archives
| '04 | '05 | '06 | '07 | '08 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Jan | Jan | Jan | |
| Feb | Feb | Feb | Feb | |
| Mar | Mar | Mar | Mar | |
| Apr | Apr | Apr | Apr | Apr |
| May | May | May | May | May |
| Jun | Jun | Jun | Jun | Jun |
| Jul | Jul | Jul | Jul | Jul |
| Aug | Aug | Aug | Aug | Aug |
| Sep | Sep | Sep | Sep | |
| Oct | Oct | Oct | Oct | |
| Nov | Nov | Nov | Nov | |
| Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec |
Around TMCnet Blogs
Communications and Technology Blog - Tehrani.com:
Yes, FiOS was a Good IdeaFirst Coffee:
Stupid Call Center Calls, Bezaitis at Aspect, New NetSuiters, Ringbacks to Hit $29 BillionGreg Galitzine's VoIP Authority Blog:
Outrageous Interactions Contest Nearing CloseVoIP & Gadgets Blog:
Microsoft Debuts Its Surface 30" Interactive Screen at SheratonCommunications and Technology Blog - Tehrani.com:
Tell Your Call Center Story: Go To HawaiiFirst Coffee:
CRM in Muscat, Al Futtaim and Futech, Apisphere and Nissho, Porthus and Microsoft, Boomi and CentiveGreg Galitzine's VoIP Authority Blog:
NEC Visit -- Dallas, TXVoIP & Gadgets Blog:
Internet Finally Takes Off into the CloudsLatest Whitepapers
Technology Marketing Corporation,
One Technology Plaza, Norwalk, CT 06854 USA
Ph: 800-243-6002, 203-852-6800; Fx: 203-853-2845
General comments: tmc@tmcnet.com.
Comments about this site: webmaster@tmcnet.com.
About | Contact | Advertise
Technology Marketing Corp. 1997-2008
Copyright | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
One Technology Plaza, Norwalk, CT 06854 USA
Ph: 800-243-6002, 203-852-6800; Fx: 203-853-2845
General comments: tmc@tmcnet.com.
Comments about this site: webmaster@tmcnet.com.
About | Contact | Advertise
Technology Marketing Corp. 1997-2008
Copyright | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Visit the Communities:
Visit the Channels:



Technorati
Del.icio.us
Slashdot
Digg
Rich,
I know the pain all too well! Back in August I was severely burned by the automatic reboot:
http://blog.danyork.com/102384.html
I lost a great amount of work that was in progress.
As I wrote there, I've gone and changed my "Automatic Updates" setting to "Download updates for me, but let me choose when to install them." This at least provides you with the control over when to reboot the system. It will nag you with a popup every five minutes or so when a reboot is required, so it's pretty effective (by being annoying) in getting you to do it. You do, of course, run the risk of having your system compromised in the interim, though. It's a tough call. I agree, though, that these productivity losses are hard to capture - yet they are indeed real costs.
Regards,
Dan
Or you can simply install this Registry hack which will still auto-download and install the patches but not nag you to reboot.
http://blogs.msdn.com/tim_rains/archive/2004/11/15/257877.aspx