California PUC and VoIP Regulation

In my mind we need a great deal less government intervention in our daily lives and this is especially true when the government serves as a direct road block to progress in an industry that has so much potential like VoIP. A recent article on TMCnet, California to Appeal FCCs Decision on VoIP Regulation shows how some states are not happy with the FCC eliminating their ability to regulate VoIP. Minnesota and California are just two of the states that are using our tax dollars to make it more difficult for VoIP to proliferate. VoIP serves the public good and we are in a very sensitive time in the industry. There are some low cost carriers giving a great deal of choice to consumers and at the low end of the scale a company like Skype is able to do much of what the paid service providers can but at no cost. If the states keep pushing to drive costs up among VoIP providers, they will make the price rift between a company like Vonage and Skype larger and more and more people will just turn to Skype.I am a huge Skype fan and advocate and have nothing against them. I just think the law of unintended consequences will push exponentially more consumers to Skype as the government decides to play around with regulating our industry to death. Couple this with the fact that more VCs will avoid VoIP investments if the revenue model isnt there and every state hangs its own regulatory cloud over the industry.This is a problem because unlike a Vonage who centrally manages telephone calls and is a US based company that collects revenue from calls, Skype is a European company that collects no revenue from the bulk of its calls and is software based meaning calls don't even have to go through Skype (unless they travel over the PSTN to a non-Skype client).I truly fear every state cutting off their noses to spite their faces and then wondering why there is no company left to regulate.So to make the record clear, I am in favor o making sure that VoIP is regulated in a manner that ensures safety as well as local number portability. I am not in favor of every state doing whatever it feels is best and damaging the entire industry along the way. If the concept of California doing its best to hurt the VoIP market upsets you, please let the California Public Utilities Commission know about it.
| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to sites that reference California PUC and VoIP Regulation:

0 TrackBacks

California PUC and VoIP Regulation TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/840

Leave comment to California PUC and VoIP Regulation article

Subscribe to Blog

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Rich Tehrani published on January 3, 2005 9:47 AM.

DSP Group's WiFi Telephony Chip: Wireless Voice Over IP was the previous entry in this blog.

VoIP Blog Legends Plug Internet Telephony Conference & Expo is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Yearly Archives

'04 '05 '06 '07 '08
  Jan Jan Jan Jan
  Feb Feb Feb Feb
  Mar Mar Mar Mar
Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr
May May May May May
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun
Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul
Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug
Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep
Oct Oct Oct Oct  
Nov Nov Nov Nov  
Dec Dec Dec Dec  

Around TMCnet Blogs

Latest Whitepapers