Please read this article by clicking on the link. I posted much of it here because it is so good and to be honest, anyone in telecom needs to be aware of these issues. I have some contact info listed at the bottom in red if you are interested in having your voice heard on this matter.
SBC to state: Kill rate regs
Seeks to scrap phone price controls; sweetens offer with 3-year freeze
By Julie Johnsson
March 21, 2005
SBC Communications Inc. is pushing
A bill introduced by Sen. James Clayborne Jr., D-East St. Louis, would effectively gut the Illinois Commerce Commission's (ICC) oversight of the rates SBC offers customers and competitors. State regulators would still have the authority to penalize the Baby Bell for shortfalls in customer service, however.
To sweeten the deal, SBC proposes a three-year freeze on the price of basic phone service for consumers who purchase only a dial tone from the Baby Bell or minor add-ons, such as caller identification. That's about 50% of the telephone giant's
The rate freeze would not apply to customers who bundle their local phone service with long-distance or broadband. Rates for such packaged deals, SBC says, will fall as competition builds with Comcast Corp., the dominant cable operator.
Not content to wait for lawmakers to act, SBC also has asked a U.S. District Court in
"We need the pricing flexibility that all our competition has," says SBC Illinois President Carrie Hightman, alluding to wireless carriers, Internet-based calling services and Comcast. "No other competitor has the pricing restrictions and regulatory hurdles that we have."
But the market is far from competitive, consumer activists and SBC foes argue, since traditional land-line telephone customers have little alternative to SBC's local service now that Virginia-based MCI and New Jersey-based AT&T Corp. are about to exit the picture.
Critics say eliminating price controls and the ICC's oversight would allow SBC to crush its rivals and raise prices at whim. "It's a complete frontal attack on everything that has created competition in
REWRITE LAW OR EXTEND IT
Rates tumbled after the long-distance providers entered the
SBC, in its emergency court motion and discussions with
But it isn't yet clear whether the FCC policy provides a minimum standard upon which states can overlay their own regulations, or whether it is really the maximum, counters state Rep. Julie Hamos, D-Evanston, who favors waiting a year before rewriting Illinois telecom law.
"There is very much a central issue in all of this: Has the federal government pre-empted our ability to move in a certain direction?" she says. "The burden is on (SBC) to show why we can't wait another year with all the flux we're in."
Ms. Hightman points to the emergence of new technologies, such as Internet-based calling, that are creating a vibrantly competitive market where there's no need for price restraints. "Every consumer in
But while nascent technology like voice over Internet protocol could provide true competition down the road, it currently accounts for less than 1% of the market, consumer activists note. And wireless isn't the threat it appears to be, since SBC owns 65% of the nation's largest carrier, Cingular Wireless.
"The left hand competing with the right hand is not exactly effective competition," says Martin Cohen, executive director of the watchdog Citizens Utility Board.
629 State Capitol
Springfield, IL 62706
Phone: (217) 782-5399
Fax: (618) 274-3010
Main District Office:
327 Missouri Ave., Ste. 422
East St. Louis, IL 62201
Phone: (618) 875-1212
Fax: (618) 274-3010