<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/memory/string-24-ssds-together-for-6tb-2gbs-throughput.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2016:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2009:/blog/tom-keating//4.40071-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for <![CDATA[String 24 SSDs together for 6TB &amp; 2GB/s throughput!]]></title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2009:/blog/tom-keating//4.40071</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/memory/string-24-ssds-together-for-6tb-2gbs-throughput.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=40071" title="String 24 SSDs together for 6TB &amp; 2GB/s throughput!" />
    <published>2009-03-10T14:09:18Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-10T14:07:03Z</updated>
    <title>String 24 SSDs together for 6TB &amp; 2GB/s throughput!</title>
    <summary>What happens when you string together 24 256GB Samsung MLC SSDs - you get 6TB of storage and 2GB/sec throughput. Sweet mother of ---! Discovered the news on Lucas Mearian&apos;s Computer World blog who writes: When you&apos;ve got millions of...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Accessories" />
    
    <category term="Gadgets" />
    
    <category term="Home Entertainment" />
    
    <category term="Memory" />
    
    <category term="Microsoft" />
    
    <category term="Technology and Science" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<span style="display: inline;" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img height="347" width="590" style="" class="mt-image-none" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/images/samsung-ssd-awesomeness.jpg" alt="samsung-ssd-awesomeness.jpg" /></span>What happens when you string together 24 256GB Samsung MLC SSDs - you get 6TB of storage and 2GB/sec throughput. Sweet mother of ---! <br /> <br /> Discovered the news on <a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/twenty_four_ssds_strung_together_for_6tb_2gb_sec_throughput">Lucas Mearian's Computer World</a> blog who writes:<blockquote> When you've got millions of dollars at your disposal, and access to some of the industry's best hardware engineers, what do you do? Well, if you're Samsung you make a YouTube video showing the speed, capacity and reliability you can get by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96dWOEa4Djs&amp;fmt=22">stringing together 24 solid state disk drives</a> behind a RAID controller to create "the world's most powerful consumer computer". The result: 6TB of storage and 2GB/sec throughput that is able to load 53 programs 18 seconds. Whoa.</blockquote><br /> <br /> The video below shows the 24 SSDs setup along with some interesting benchmarks. For instance, in the video they rip a 700MB DVD in 0.8s, open all of Microsoft Office apps in 0.5s, and launch 53 programs in 18.09s! At $500 a pop per SSD, it'll cost you $12,000 for ludicrously fast hard drive speeds! Of course, I remember writing about <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/technology-and-science/super-fast-samsung-sata-hard-drive.asp">Samsung's Super Fast SATA hard drive in 2004</a>, which featured 3Gb/s speed using traditional HDD technology, which is cheaper than SSDs. Of course, it's 3Gb/s (3 Gigabits per second) not 3GB/s (3 Gigabytes per second), so you'd have to divide that by 8 bits per byte or 0.375 GB/s or 375MB/s. That's odd - that's faster than the 220MB/s random access speed of each individual SSD (aggregate is 24 x 220MB/s). I thought SSDs were generally faster than hard drives? Something must be off in my math. Actually, just read that the 3GB/s is the speed of the I/O channel. The read speed is 1.5GB/s or 0.156 GB/s, which is 156MB/s . Now that sounds more accurate!<br /> <br /> And then of course, there's perpendicular hard drive technology, which is a new way of "squeezing" more bits onto a hard drive by changing the orientation of the way the bits are recorded. Normally magnetic bits are written parallel to the drive's surface, but not with perpendicularity - its 90 degrees perpendicular to the normal parallel orientation. Because the bits are recorded upright and "into" the surface of the drive platter, you can squeeze a lot more bits together without the bits polarity causing the bits to flip their magnetic orientation. Check out my <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/technology-and-science/perpendicular-hard-drive-technology-and-school-house-rock.asp">blog post</a> where a classic School House Rock video makes an appearance along with a <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/technology-and-science/perpendicular-hard-drive-technology-and-school-house-rock.asp">hilarious Hitachi video</a> on perpendicular HDD technology.<br /><br />Anyway, here's the 24 SSD RAID video:<br /> <object width="560" height="345"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/96dWOEa4Djs&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/96dWOEa4Djs&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="345"></embed></object>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
