<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/do-we-really-need-a-zune-phone.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31839-</id>
  <updated>2013-02-22T21:05:12Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Do We Really Need a Zune Phone?</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31839</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/do-we-really-need-a-zune-phone.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=31839" title="Do We Really Need a Zune Phone?" />
    <published>2007-02-01T20:43:56Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:13Z</updated>
    <title>Do We Really Need a Zune Phone?</title>
    <summary>First we waited in great anticipation for Apple&apos;s iPhone -- and are still intrigued by it (even with the Cisco heat), but then we never really got too revved up about the idea of the Zune phone ... (get the...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Randy Savicky</name>
      <uri>http://www.strategypluscommunications.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Mobile Phones" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><img alt="" hspace="7" align="left" vspace="7" src="http://www.zune.net/NR/rdonlyres/349A9D5A-5065-4EC2-B400-7917FAC18A15/0/187x86download1doubleshotstn.jpg" />First we waited in great anticipation for<strong> Apple's iPhone</strong> -- and are still intrigued by it (even with the <strong>Cisco</strong> heat), but then we never really got too revved up about the idea of the<strong> Zune</strong> <strong>phone</strong> ... (get the scoop <a href="http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/01/source-microsoft-zune-phone-in-the-works/">here</a>. Here's what <strong>Microsoft's</strong> <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/106809.asp">home town paper</a> had to say).</font></p>
<p><font size="2">In fact, wonder if anyone did even think of the idea -- and then no less get excited about it -- a Zune phone?&nbsp; Certainly lacks the coolness factor from a product naming perspective -- the &quot;Zunephone&quot; perhaps?.)</font></p>
<p><font size="2">So what have we now? Another face-off between Microsoft and Apple -- this time over music playing cell phones.</font></p>
<p><font size="2">Now of course this is another one of those &quot;product to be&quot; announcements -- not about a real product that can be shipped and purchased today (or at least very soon), but one that will see the light of day sometime in the future.</font></p>
<p><font size="2">(Anyone out there want to resurrect the term &quot;vaporware&quot;?)</font></p>
<p><font size="2">Now, I'm not saying that these might not be real products after all, but let me know when they're available, OK? <img alt="" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mtstatic/FCKeditor/emoticons/shades_smile.gif" /></font></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31839-comment:23306</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31839" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/do-we-really-need-a-zune-phone.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/do-we-really-need-a-zune-phone.asp#c23306" />
    <title>Comment from may on 2007-02-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>may</name>
        <uri>http://www.51pc.com.cn</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.51pc.com.cn">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice blog. Great news!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-02T03:55:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31839-comment:23313</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31839" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/do-we-really-need-a-zune-phone.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/do-we-really-need-a-zune-phone.asp#c23313" />
    <title>Comment from Randy Savicky on 2007-02-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Randy Savicky</name>
        <uri>http://www.strategypluscommunications.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.strategypluscommunications.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-02T18:14:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31839-comment:28122</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31839" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/do-we-really-need-a-zune-phone.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/do-we-really-need-a-zune-phone.asp#c28122" />
    <title>Comment from Make Money on 2007-08-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Make Money</name>
        <uri>http://www.factoryfast.com.au/affiliate_affiliate.php</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.factoryfast.com.au/affiliate_affiliate.php">
        <![CDATA[<p>And so the wars begin : between two people that have never made phones before.<br />
In all honesty, I know Microsoft has done well with the xBox, but they really are better at making software than hardware. Obviously, they expect the iPhone to be a success and want to jump on the bandwagon. No doubt, I think the iPhone is brilliant, but a Microsoft phone does get a no thanks from me. I don't even really like their Windows Mobile software that iMate and HTC etc. use, but I live with it. I can think of 100 things they could have done better with it, though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-08T11:04:11Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
