<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/google/begun-the-search-war-has-google-social-search-results-in-bing-defectio.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/blog/tom-keating//4.48262-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Begun the Search War Has! Google+ Social Search Results in Bing Defections</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/blog/tom-keating//4.48262</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/google/begun-the-search-war-has-google-social-search-results-in-bing-defectio.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=48262" title="Begun the Search War Has! Google+ Social Search Results in Bing Defections" />
    <published>2012-01-13T16:59:07Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-14T00:46:56Z</updated>
    <title>Begun the Search War Has! Google+ Social Search Results in Bing Defections</title>
    <summary>Could Google&apos;s recent change &quot;Search, Plus Your World&quot; be a &quot;Netflix&quot; faux pas causing a similar mass exodus of users from Google to Microsoft&apos;s Bing search engine? Well, at least one high-profile website, Gizmodo has one of its columnists jumping...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="Internet" />
    
    <category term="Microsoft" />
    
    <category term="TMCnet" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<img class="mt-image-none" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/images/google-logo-large.jpg" alt="google-logo-large.jpg" width="497" height="175" align="none" /><br /><br /><img class="mt-image-right" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/images/yoda.gif" alt="" width="329" height="240" align="right" />Could Google's recent change "<a href="http://www.google.com/insidesearch/plus.html">Search, Plus Your World</a>" be a <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/business&id=8405646">"Netflix" faux pas</a> causing a similar mass exodus of users from Google to Microsoft's <a href="http://www.bing.com">Bing</a> search engine? Well, at least one high-profile website, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5875571/google-just-made-bing-the-best-search-engine">Gizmodo has one of its columnists jumping ship</a>.&nbsp; The new search integrates Google+ (Google's Facebook competitor) content directly into  search results. It includes "personal results"  which include Google+ status updates, Picasa photos, blog posts, etc. that have been privately  shared with you as well as your own content. It will also examine your past searches and display results based on your search activity or what you clicked on.<br /><br />All the personalized search results pushes other relevant content down by being placed at the top of the page. Gizmodo explains:
<blockquote>It deeply integrated Google+ into search results. It's ostensibly meant  to deliver more personalized results. But it pulls those personalized  results largely from Google services&mdash;Google+, Picasa, YouTube. Search  for a restaurant, and instead of its Yelp page, the top result might be  someone you know discussing it on Google Plus. Over at SearchEngineland,  <a href="http://searchengineland.com/examples-google-search-plus-drive-facebook-twitter-crazy-107554">Danny Sullivan has compiled a series</a> of damning examples of the ways Google's new interface promotes Plus  over relevancy. Long story short: It's a huge step backwards.</blockquote>
Sure you can opt-out - it's not that difficult. However, in my experience as CTO managing IT support and doing my own IT support, I know how users think and they often can't be troubled to figure out even simple computer tasks. If something requires even minimal effort they'll just move onto something simpler that doesn't require as much effort. Some of it can be attributed to laziness, but many users just aren't that tech-savvy and want things spoon-fed to them.<br /><br />By Google now making their main search engine return less relevant results, there could be a mass exodus to Bing. Finally, Google may have met a worthy search engine competitor! <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a> battled Google for years and wasn't able to dethrone the "king of search". With this one move by Google to ram socialized results down our throats, they may have just opened the door for Microsoft's Bing to steal a bigger slice of Google's dominant search engine market share.<br />]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
