<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/video-hardware-software/something-new-for-the-settop-box.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31679-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Something New for the Set-Top Box?</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.31679</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/video-hardware-software/something-new-for-the-settop-box.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=31679" title="Something New for the Set-Top Box?" />
    <published>2007-01-17T15:54:09Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:14Z</updated>
    <title>Something New for the Set-Top Box?</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[ Interesting article in today's New York Times about the lowly set-top box that brings TV into our homes today (or at least a large part of U.S. homes today) is undergoing a transformation. (At least by what was shown&nbsp;by...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Randy Savicky</name>
      <uri>http://www.strategypluscommunications.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Video Hardware &amp; Software" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><img style="WIDTH: 244px; HEIGHT: 189px" height="274" alt="" hspace="7" width="368" align="left" vspace="7" border="1" src="http://broadband.motorola.com/50M/images/comparison_1b.jpg" /></font></p>
<p><font size="2">Interesting <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/17/technology/17settop.html?ex=1326690000&amp;en=7a957a0a23657bcb&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">article </a>in today's <strong><em>New York Times</em></strong> about the lowly <strong>set-top box</strong> that brings TV into our homes today (or at least a large part of U.S. homes today) is undergoing a transformation.</font></p>
<p><font size="2">(At least by what was shown&nbsp;by companies like <strong>Motorola</strong> at <strong>CES </strong>earlier this month.)</font></p>
<p><font size="2">Now while the article goes on to describe how this box is now being looked on to do more -- record shows on an internal hard drive, etc. -- why doesn't someone think of making these things look any better?</font></p>
<p><font size="2">They are usually <strong>black and ugly</strong> -- how about some color?</font></p>
<p><font size="2">Or better yet, how about some enterprising company developing <strong>skins</strong> for these things?&nbsp; <img alt="" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mtstatic/FCKeditor/emoticons/lightbulb.gif" /></font></p>
<p><font size="2">We've got skins for<strong> Xbox</strong> and the like so why not this piece of gadget hardware? <br />
</font><font size="2"></font></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
