I was just on Microsoft BetaPlace downloading the Microsoft Device Emulator 1.0 Community Preview to test Windows Mobile 5.0 with Exchange ActiveSync and the download timed-out at 98%. 2% remaining? Such a tease... I then tried accessing http://beta.microsoft.com from and it too timed-out. From my work PC I then remote desktopped to me home PC and tried on my home PC and it too failed. It's been over two hours, so it looks like a BetaPlace outage to me. Damn it - and I only have 48KB left! Side note: If you don't have Visual Studio 2005 installed and you want to use Microsoft's Windows Mobile 5.0 emulator, just download the Windows Mobile 5.0 SDK. If you have no intention of doing any kind of development of a Pocket PC device, then the full Visual Studio installation is serious overkill. Instead, extract the emulator files from the SDK MSI file.
Windows Mobile 5.0 SDK
microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?id=83..
Do not attempt to install this file as it will fail if you do not have Visual Studio installed.
Once you download the MSI file, simply follow these instructions here to extract the emulator.
Why all the fuss in installing a Windows Mobile 5.0 emulator on my PC? Well, basically, I'm trying to troubleshoot synchronizing my boss's Verizon Windows Mobile 5.0 device (Verizon XV6700) with our Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 using the new Exchange 2003 Always-Up-To-Date Notification (AUTD) feature. I wrote about this cool push synchronization capability in a blog titled "Microsoft killed the Blackberry Star".
In that blog entry, I wrote "...the BlackBerry Enterprise Server Software costs $3999 just for 20 licenses (even 1 user license is a whopping $2999). On the other hand, Microsoft's Messaging and Security Feature Pack (MSFP) for Windows Mobile 5.0 features direct integration between Exchange Server 2003 and more importantly this integration also eliminates the need for business customers to add another server or pay additional client access license (CAL) fees and an ongoing data service fee to third parties. In other words, if you already own a Microsoft Exchange Server, you already have the capability for push email capabilities for FREE."
Well, I may have been a bit premature in claiming a Microsoft "victory" over Blackberry/RIM considering I've spent hours trying to get ActiveSync for Exchange to work for over 4 days with no success. I was not alone in assuming that Exchange SP2 enables MSFP to work, but didn't know that I needed to get MSFP from the OEM phone manufacturer and not Microsoft. Verizon OEMs the XV6700 from Audiovox, so I would need Verizon to provide MSFP. One of Microsoft's own bloggers, Jason Langridge, aka Mr. Mobile, wrote a post titled Where is the Messaging and Security Feature Pack?. This blog post is filled with comments from irate Windows Mobile 5.0 users who can't get Messaging and Security Feature Pack (MSFP) to work. One commenter writes, "You are right about there being a lot of confusion - generated mostly from the Microsoft Exchange website I think. The marketing material for Exchange 2K3 SP2 makes many claims of functionality without stating that MSFP is required."
Exactly my sentiments! When I read the press release about MSFP I figured it was done deal. Simply go buy a Windows Mobile 5.0 device and have instant Blackberry-like functionality with your enterprise Exchange Server. If only it were that simple. :@ Apparently, my boss Rich needs to wait for Verizon to "push" or make available for download - the MSFP software for his XV6700 mobile phone. Boy, if you read Microsoft's news about MSFP you'd think it was available today on every Windows Mobile 5.0 device.
On another Mr. Mobile blog post, a user who just purchased a Windows Mobile 5.0 Palm 700w writes, "I smell a class action lawsuit all over this. There is a tremendous amount of confusion out there. Just look a the other forums. This is turning into a big issue for anyone using an exchange server. We purchased three units and returned them as well the same day, once we realized the DirectPush update was missing. The common opinion is that we were mislead. I took a look at the launch video again, and the 700 was clearly demonstrated WITH the DirectPush capability. Sounds like false advertising to me? I think Palm needs to specifically state when that release is coming or they are going to be faced with a lot of unhappy customers, especially in the enterprise segment! I for one, am going to write a letter directly to Palm's executive management to express my frustration, hopefully they will respond with something concrete."
Apparently, there is a patent lawsuit by Visto against Microsoft's mobile access to email and data technology direct-push technology. This article writes, "What does it mean? It means that end users of Windows Mobile 5.0 devices may never see that push e-mail from Microsoft! It is like patenting DNA or breathing process and then requesting big money from everybody who has DNA or breathes. Clearly Microsoft developed their push technology on their own and Visto's patents are so generic to cover almost anything. This is bad news for Windows Mobile 5.0 platform. Very bad news."
Here we go again. If it's not NTP suiting RIM now we have Visto suing Microsoft over a similar technology concept. :@ This lawsuit was filed BEFORE Microsoft announced MSFP so perhaps Microsoft settled the case. But if so, I didn't hear about it. Then again, I didn't know Visto was suing in the first place!
On top of it all, before I installed Exchange SP2, a co-worker's Treo 650 (Palm OS) was working just fine synchronizing happily with our corporate Exchange Server. Unfortunately, now that functionality no longer works. Searching Google to resolve the issues I was having with ActiveSync as well as OMA and OWA revealed more Microsoft KB articles and "supposed solutions" than I care to share. Though there were some links worth sharing if anyone else is having problems, so here are some of the best ones I found:
eggheadcafe.com/forum/exchangemobility/05/post23653139
eggheadcafe.com/forum/exchangemobility/05/post24430690
eggheadcafe.com/forum/Exchangemobility/
technet.com/sbs/archive/2006/02/07/418937.aspx
Microsoft Troubleshoot Exchange 2003 Always-Up-To-Date Notification:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822176
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/817379/en-us - I did these steps. Didn’t do anything.
Event ID: 1503 Event Source: MSExchangeOMA – Saw this in Event Viewer. I just upgraded to NET 2.0. still getting error.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=842119
technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/04/26/120520.aspx
geekzone.co.nz/content.asp?contentid=4048
http://209.34.241.68/exchange/archive/2005/07/07/407416.aspx
msexchange.org/tuts/ManagingMobileAccess-Exchange-Server-2003
msexchange.org/tutorials/ConfiguringMobileDevicesExchange2003
http://hardware.mcse.ms/archive96-2004-11-103868.html
Update:
The solution was to reinstall Exchange SP2 (see comments). So simple, yet so frustrating!
android apple asterisk at&t blackberry cell phone cisco dell digium e911 facebook fcc google google talk gps im ip-pbx ipad iphone ipod itexpo ITEXPO lync microsoft mobile phone open source outage phone review sip skype sony unified communications verizon video video conferencing voip vonage wireless xbox 360
- Apple (280)
- Bittorrent (2)
- Call Center and CRM (48)
- Computer Hardware (183)
- Computer Software (71)
- Gadgets (650)
- Google (225)
- Home Entertainment (263)
- Internet (173)
- Linux (111)
- Microsoft (376)
- MovableType (48)
- News (187)
- Personal and Humor (118)
- Politics (9)
- Reviews (246)
- Security (2)
- Social Networking (42)
- Sports/Outdoor Technology (9)
- Tablets (32)
- Technology and Science (355)
- Unified Communications (471)
- VoIP (2285)
- Wireless (584)
- p2p (20)
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
Featured Videos