I was just on Microsoft BetaPlace downloading the Microsoft Device Emulator 1.0 Community Preview to test Windows Mobile 5.0 with Exchange ActiveSync and the download timed-out at 98%. 2% remaining? Such a tease... I then tried accessing http://beta.microsoft.com from and it too timed-out. From my work PC I then remote desktopped to me home PC and tried on my home PC and it too failed. It's been over two hours, so it looks like a BetaPlace outage to me. Damn it - and I only have 48KB left! Side note: If you don't have Visual Studio 2005 installed and you want to use Microsoft's Windows Mobile 5.0 emulator, just download the Windows Mobile 5.0 SDK. If you have no intention of doing any kind of development of a Pocket PC device, then the full Visual Studio installation is serious overkill. Instead, extract the emulator files from the SDK MSI file.
Windows Mobile 5.0 SDK
microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?id=83..
Do not attempt to install this file as it will fail if you do not have Visual Studio installed.
Once you download the MSI file, simply follow these instructions here to extract the emulator.
Why all the fuss in installing a Windows Mobile 5.0 emulator on my PC? Well, basically, I'm trying to troubleshoot synchronizing my boss's Verizon Windows Mobile 5.0 device (Verizon XV6700) with our Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 using the new Exchange 2003 Always-Up-To-Date Notification (AUTD) feature. I wrote about this cool push synchronization capability in a blog titled "Microsoft killed the Blackberry Star".
In that blog entry, I wrote "...the BlackBerry Enterprise Server Software costs $3999 just for 20 licenses (even 1 user license is a whopping $2999). On the other hand, Microsoft's Messaging and Security Feature Pack (MSFP) for Windows Mobile 5.0 features direct integration between Exchange Server 2003 and more importantly this integration also eliminates the need for business customers to add another server or pay additional client access license (CAL) fees and an ongoing data service fee to third parties. In other words, if you already own a Microsoft Exchange Server, you already have the capability for push email capabilities for FREE."
Well, I may have been a bit premature in claiming a Microsoft "victory" over Blackberry/RIM considering I've spent hours trying to get ActiveSync for Exchange to work for over 4 days with no success. I was not alone in assuming that Exchange SP2 enables MSFP to work, but didn't know that I needed to get MSFP from the OEM phone manufacturer and not Microsoft. Verizon OEMs the XV6700 from Audiovox, so I would need Verizon to provide MSFP. One of Microsoft's own bloggers, Jason Langridge, aka Mr. Mobile, wrote a post titled Where is the Messaging and Security Feature Pack?. This blog post is filled with comments from irate Windows Mobile 5.0 users who can't get Messaging and Security Feature Pack (MSFP) to work. One commenter writes, "You are right about there being a lot of confusion - generated mostly from the Microsoft Exchange website I think. The marketing material for Exchange 2K3 SP2 makes many claims of functionality without stating that MSFP is required."
Exactly my sentiments! When I read the press release about MSFP I figured it was done deal. Simply go buy a Windows Mobile 5.0 device and have instant Blackberry-like functionality with your enterprise Exchange Server. If only it were that simple.
Apparently, my boss Rich needs to wait for Verizon to "push" or make available for download - the MSFP software for his XV6700 mobile phone. Boy, if you read Microsoft's news about MSFP you'd think it was available today on every Windows Mobile 5.0 device.
On another Mr. Mobile blog post, a user who just purchased a Windows Mobile 5.0 Palm 700w writes, "I smell a class action lawsuit all over this. There is a tremendous amount of confusion out there. Just look a the other forums. This is turning into a big issue for anyone using an exchange server. We purchased three units and returned them as well the same day, once we realized the DirectPush update was missing. The common opinion is that we were mislead. I took a look at the launch video again, and the 700 was clearly demonstrated WITH the DirectPush capability. Sounds like false advertising to me? I think Palm needs to specifically state when that release is coming or they are going to be faced with a lot of unhappy customers, especially in the enterprise segment! I for one, am going to write a letter directly to Palm's executive management to express my frustration, hopefully they will respond with something concrete."
Apparently, there is a patent lawsuit by Visto against Microsoft's mobile access to email and data technology direct-push technology. This article writes, "What does it mean? It means that end users of Windows Mobile 5.0 devices may never see that push e-mail from Microsoft! It is like patenting DNA or breathing process and then requesting big money from everybody who has DNA or breathes. Clearly Microsoft developed their push technology on their own and Visto's patents are so generic to cover almost anything. This is bad news for Windows Mobile 5.0 platform. Very bad news."
Here we go again. If it's not NTP suiting RIM now we have Visto suing Microsoft over a similar technology concept.
This lawsuit was filed BEFORE Microsoft announced MSFP so perhaps Microsoft settled the case. But if so, I didn't hear about it. Then again, I didn't know Visto was suing in the first place!
On top of it all, before I installed Exchange SP2, a co-worker's Treo 650 (Palm OS) was working just fine synchronizing happily with our corporate Exchange Server. Unfortunately, now that functionality no longer works. Searching Google to resolve the issues I was having with ActiveSync as well as OMA and OWA revealed more Microsoft KB articles and "supposed solutions" than I care to share. Though there were some links worth sharing if anyone else is having problems, so here are some of the best ones I found:
eggheadcafe.com/forum/exchangemobility/05/post23653139
eggheadcafe.com/forum/exchangemobility/05/post24430690
eggheadcafe.com/forum/Exchangemobility/
technet.com/sbs/archive/2006/02/07/418937.aspx
Microsoft Troubleshoot Exchange 2003 Always-Up-To-Date Notification:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822176
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/817379/en-us - I did these steps. Didnât do anything.
Event ID: 1503 Event Source: MSExchangeOMA â Saw this in Event Viewer. I just upgraded to NET 2.0. still getting error.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=842119
technet.com/exchange/archive/2004/04/26/120520.aspx
geekzone.co.nz/content.asp?contentid=4048
http://209.34.241.68/exchange/archive/2005/07/07/407416.aspx
msexchange.org/tuts/ManagingMobileAccess-Exchange-Server-2003
msexchange.org/tutorials/ConfiguringMobileDevicesExchange2003
http://hardware.mcse.ms/archive96-2004-11-103868.html
Update:
The solution was to reinstall Exchange SP2 (see comments). So simple, yet so frustrating!
Microsoft BetaPlace outage and Exchange ActiveSync MSFP problem
Listed below are links to sites that reference Microsoft BetaPlace outage and Exchange ActiveSync MSFP problem:
1 TrackBack
Microsoft BetaPlace outage and Exchange ActiveSync MSFP problem TrackBack URL: http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/24150
Some pretty cool news from USRobotics that lets you use Skype to directly call their Customer Support infrastructure. This saves USRobotics the cost of the toll-free number and it enables customers to get into the support queue much easier. Considering... Read More



Technorati
Del.icio.us
Slashdot
Digg
Excluding the statements about the 700w being shown w/ the MSFP (Windows Mobile 5 AKU 2.x) during it's launch and the betaplace outage, the article above is full of bad information.
Sure, joe-shmoe consumer might belive that the device is ready, but this guy is writing blogs, like he knows enough to inform you. Anyone running an Exchange server (or anyone investigating a story) should have read the documentation provided at www.microsoft.com/exchange- it was pretty rich with details about the two components of "push" email: Exchange 2003 SP2 and a Windows Mobile 5 device with the MSFP installed.
The smallest amount of leg work (say googling MSFP+pocketpc) would have provided enough information to know the MSFP is a rom-level update. Anyone who has ever owned a pocketpc would know that ROM upgrades come from the OEM and not Microsoft.
Further, understand that the Visto lawsuit has abosolutely nothing with to do with MSFP shipping delays, and that Microsoft has extended legal protection to all it's PocketPC partners.
I'm not disqualifying the notion that users are becoming impatient and are tired of waiting for an upgrade, but that is the extent of it- with the exclusive exception of the 700w, everyone has known addiitonal functionality would be provided at a later time.
Blogging is making news, and uneducated blogging is making bad news.
My blog post never had any pretense that I was completely educated on MSFP. My boss bought a Verizon Windows Mobile 5.0 phone device and asked me to get it to work with our Exchange Server. I was learning as I went. I knew about the new MSFP announcment and just assumed as many people did that Microsoft was including it as an easy update with Windows Mobile 5.0.
I did do some Googling and most of the talk about MSFP was how to set it up on the server. There was little talk about ROM updates. I'm sure there are plenty of links on the web mentioning it, but unless I hit it by pure chance, how would I know? I did eventually find out about it, and I explained as such in my blog post.
>>Blogging is making news, and uneducated blogging is making bad news.
Blogging isn't just news. Depending on the blog, it's also opinion, humor, personal antedotes, etc. If you expect my blog to be simply about news, you haven't been reading my blog for very long.
I think writing the above article telling my experience about MSFP is educational. Not everyone is an expert in every thing, including myself, so I always try to post my entire experience, including my mistakes and my successes. My mistakes can help others not do the same thing.
Obviously, you were more educated on the matter and didn't need to read about my experience and my misunderstanding. A modest person would say "Wow, I'm surprised Tom didn't know that, but I guess it's good he's helping others not to fall into the same trap." An arrogant person would say "Why are you wasting my time posting this? Everyone knows this already or they're just NOOBs or idiots!" Which camp do you fall under?
It's a known fact that there are plenty others out there that were confused. They can take comfort in the knowledge that they weren't the only ones confused by Microsoft accidentally or purposefully positioning MSFP as something attainable now for all Windows Mobile 5.0 devices.
I stand by what I wrote.
Just a heads-up on what the problem was. For some reason my Exchange Server 2003 was in a half-ass state - with some SP1 files and some SP2 files. The Microsoft tech support guy was amazed it happened. he spent 5 hours trying to figure out why SP2 was only partially installed. Eventually we just reinstalled SP2 and it fixed the problem.
Now my boss is happily synching with his Verizon VX6700.
When you says your boss is happily synching with his Verizon VX6700. Is he able to use the "push"? If not, can you give me the mobile access setting you used in Exchange 2003 SP2?
Thanks.
In Exchange Administrator:
- right-clcik, New, Mobile Carrier
- Verizon
- SMTP: @smtp.vzwmail.net
Your blog is brilliant source of information and reource. I can forget having lunch but never forget to visit your blog. you are right Blogging is not just making news, its sharing your views and opinions about certain subject. Its linked to our fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression.Its true that uneducated blogging is making bad news.
Also only those blogs becomes popular which are written by well educated and well versed by the knowledge of that topic. This blog really rocks.
http://voip-phone-service-equipment.blogspot.com
Verizon XV6700 is a real smart, easy ti use, compact Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC phone and has a standard QVGA display, 416 MHz processor, 64 MB of RAM, 128 MB of flash ROM, EVDO, WiFi, Bluetooth and a 1.3 megapixel camera. Quite a few features for the relatively modest $399 price! Its unique (well, unique to the HTC Wizard and Apache designs) side-firing slide out keyboard is roomy, easy to use and backlit. What else it has great looks too.
http://www.voip-traffic.com/articles/how-voip-works.html