<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860-</id>
  <updated>2013-02-22T21:05:26Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Blog and You&apos;ll get Fired</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=25860" title="Blog and You'll get Fired" />
    <published>2006-06-13T13:58:57Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:18Z</updated>
    <title>Blog and You&apos;ll get Fired</title>
    <summary>Proofpoint&apos;s survey has some interesting statistics including that 38% of large companies hire staff to read employee email. The survey also has a lot of stats on blogging, including a statistic that states 7.1% of companies have fired an employee...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="MovableType" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[Proofpoint's survey has some interesting statistics including that 38% of large companies hire staff to read employee email. The survey also has a lot of stats on blogging, including a statistic that states 7.1% of companies have fired an employee for violating blog or message board policies. Uh oh... I hope I don't get fired for posting <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/news/globalcomm-failure-will-hooters-girls-help.asp">Hooters girls on top of a red Dodge Viper</a>. <img src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mtstatic/FCKeditor/emoticons/embaressed_smile.gif" alt="" /><br /><br />Check out the survey:<br /><br /><strong>2006 Proofpoint Survey Finds that 7.1% of Large US Companies Fired Employees for Blogging and Message Board Infractions In Last 12 Months<br /></strong><br />Subject: Proofpoint's 2006 survey of 294 decision-makers at large U.S. companies shows growing concern over sensitive information leaving the enterprise through electronic channels such as email, blog pages and message boards. In fact, 55.4% of these large companies (with 20,000 or more employees) have expressed their uneasiness that regulations guarding the firm's privacy will be violated by members of the &quot;e-communication&quot; community.&nbsp; In an effort to reduce risk of exposure, 44% of larger companies employ staff to monitor outbound email, and nearly 1 in 5 companies (17.3%) has disciplined an employee for disobeying blog or message board policies. <br /><br />Date: June 13, 2006<br /><br />In its annual study of outbound email and content security issues, messaging security company Proofpoint, Inc. found that outbound email and other outbound electronic communication protocols continue to grow as a source of risk for companies.&nbsp; Companies appear to have good reason to worry about the safety of their information &ndash; more than a third (34.7%) of companies report their business was affected by the disclosure of sensitive material in the past year. Furthermore, more than 1 in 3 investigated a suspected email leak of confidential or proprietary information and 36.4% investigated a suspected violation of privacy or data protection regulations in the past year. <br /><br />While emails have been a major source of exposure, other communication channels have become increasingly risky as well.&nbsp; Companies fear that financial data, healthcare information, or other private materials may be posted in blogs, sent through instant messaging, or transmitted by other means.&nbsp; <br /><br />Additional key findings from the survey, which was fielded by Forrester Consulting, include:<br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Nearly 1 in 3 companies (31.6%) has terminated an employee for violating email policies in the past 12 months. More than half (52.4%) of companies have disciplined an employee for violating email policies in the past year. <br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; More than 1 in 5 (21.1%) companies were impacted by improper exposure or theft of customer information, while 15% were impacted by improper exposure or theft of intellectual property. <br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Companies estimate that more than 1 in 5 outgoing emails (22.8%) contains content that poses a legal, financial or regulatory risk. The most common form of non-compliant content is messages that contain confidential or proprietary business information. <br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The study found that 38% of companies with 1,000 or more employees hire staff to read or analyze outbound email. 44% of larger companies (those with more than 20,000 employees) employ staff for this purpose. <br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; More than 1 in 4 companies (25.2%) were ordered by a court or regulatory body to produce employee email in the last year. <br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 17.7% of companies investigated the exposure of confidential, sensitive or private information by a third-party vendor or outsourcing firm with whom they share such data. <br /><br />The study also found that other communications channels, such as blogs and message boards, are emerging as sources of risk for companies:<br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; More than half (55.4%) of companies are very concerned about Web-based email as a conduit for exposure of confidential or proprietary information. Respondents are also very concerned about FTP, instant messaging, peer-to-peer networks, blogs and message boards. <br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Nearly 1 in 5 companies (17.3%) has disciplined an employee for violating blog or message board policies in the last year. 7.1% of companies fired an employee for such infractions. <br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 10% of public companies investigated the exposure of material financial information via a blog or message board posting in the past year. <br /><br />This year's study indicates that the issues that companies are most concerned about are:<br /><br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Protecting personal identity and financial information confidentiality in email<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ensuring compliance with financial disclosure or corporate governance regulations<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ensuring that confidential internal memos cannot be disseminated via email<br />&bull;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Protecting the confidentiality of private healthcare information in email<br /><br />Proofpoint also surveyed 112 large companies based in the UK for this year's study. To download a free copy of Proofpoint's complete report, Outbound Email and Content Security in Today's Enterprise, 2006, visit: <a href="http://www.proofpoint.com/outbound/">http://www.proofpoint.com/outbound/</a>.]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860-comment:11578</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp#c11578" />
    <title>Comment from PhoneBoy on 2006-06-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>PhoneBoy</name>
        <uri>http://www.phoneboy.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.phoneboy.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now *this* is why I am very careful when I talk about my day job on my blog. :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-06-13T21:22:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860-comment:11613</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp#c11613" />
    <title>Comment from seoph on 2006-06-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>seoph</name>
        <uri>http://www.noels-isulong-seoph.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.noels-isulong-seoph.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some very nice figures there.  I'd better be careful or else, I might become part of the statistic.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-06-14T04:55:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860-comment:11633</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp#c11633" />
    <title>Comment from VoIP Gateway on 2006-06-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>VoIP Gateway</name>
        <uri>http://www.voip-traffic.com/articles/voip-gateway.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.voip-traffic.com/articles/voip-gateway.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>But its not fair..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-06-14T08:17:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860-comment:11953</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp#c11953" />
    <title>Comment from Isulong SEOph - Bicol on 2006-06-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Isulong SEOph - Bicol</name>
        <uri>http://www.isulongseoph-bicol.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.isulongseoph-bicol.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Waah! Another guilty individual here. I should be very careful, really. Or else I will also be part of the statistics. But I think blogging also helps employees to enhance their skills especially if their work is laso related in blogging.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-06-16T01:24:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860-comment:13230</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.25860" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/movabletype/blog-and-youll-get-fired.asp#c13230" />
    <title>Comment from Dario de Judicibus on 2006-06-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dario de Judicibus</name>
        <uri>http://lindipendente.splinder.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://lindipendente.splinder.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think it is a *cultural* problem. In Italy the Law on Privacy absolutely forbid that a company would snoopy in its employees' e-mail or network activities. First Echelon, then the Patriot Act, and now this bad policy to look inside private e-mails (yes, they are private anyway), I wonder if USA is still the Country of Freedom... I think it is not. I wonder why Americans accept that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-06-24T08:54:29Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
