<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/news/aol-and-yahoo-to-tax-email.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.22910-</id>
  <updated>2013-02-22T21:05:36Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for AOL and Yahoo to tax email</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.22910</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/news/aol-and-yahoo-to-tax-email.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=22910" title="AOL and Yahoo to tax email" />
    <published>2006-02-06T20:07:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:20Z</updated>
    <title>AOL and Yahoo to tax email</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[According to the AP, Yahoo Inc. and America Online, plan to introduce a service that would charge senders a fee to route their e-mail directly to a user's mailbox without first passing through junk mail filters.The AP states, &quot;The fees,...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<p>According to the AP, Yahoo Inc. and America Online, plan to introduce a service that would charge senders a fee to route their e-mail directly to a user's mailbox without first passing through junk mail filters.<br /><br />The AP states, &quot;The fees, which would range from 1/4 cent to one cent per e-mail, are the latest attempts by the companies to weed out unsolicited ads, commonly called spam, and identity-theft scams. In exchange for paying, e-mail senders will be guaranteed their messages won't be filtered and will bear a seal alerting recipients they're legitimate.&quot;<br /><br />So in other words, Yahoo and American Online, two publicly traded companies will charge for email? Sure, Yahoo and AOL will only charge &quot;so-called&quot; marketers to ensure their emails get through, but my guess is that Yahoo &amp; AOL will &quot;loosen&quot; their spam rules which will catch more legitimate emails, thus forcing legitimate users to pay Yahoo and AOL money to ensure their emails go through thus raising their stock revenue/performance. It's the end of Internet email as we know it. :@ <br /><br />Even if this only does hit &quot;marketers&quot; do I <span style="font-style: italic;">really </span>want marketers bypassing my hosted email provider's spam rules and thus delivering crap DIRECTLY to my main Inbox? I rely on hosted email providers to &quot;weed&quot; out most of the chaff so I'd be totally annoyed if all of a sudden I started receiving spam in my main Yahoo Inbox instead of it staying in the Junk folder where it belongs. Considering both are public companies, there is a definite &quot;conflict of interest&quot; in wanting to increase revenue. Therefore, soon just about everything will be &quot;classified as spam&quot; and therefore require an email delivery fee.<br /><br />Of course, users could then switch to Google Gmail or Microsoft Hotmail. Unless Gmail and Hotmail jump onboard the paid email gravy train. In fact, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/03/05/spam.charge.ap/index.html">Bill Gates proposed &quot;paying&quot; for an e-stamp for email</a> back in 2004, which set of a firestorm of controversy. So certainly Microsoft Hotmail could be next to go the route of pay-per-email &quot;guaranteed&quot; delivery. Soon all the hosted email Big Boys will start requiring pay-per-email. It's a vast conspiracy I tell ya!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.22910-comment:5408</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.22910" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/news/aol-and-yahoo-to-tax-email.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/news/aol-and-yahoo-to-tax-email.asp#c5408" />
    <title>Comment from Pat K on 2006-02-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pat K</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have been told that AOL & Yahoo plan to tax email. Is there any validy to this or is it an urban legend? Can anyone with any authority in Yahoo or AOLdisclaim or verify this?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-16T15:49:11Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
