<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/technology-and-science/more-government-is-not-a-good-p2p-file-sharing-preventative.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2014:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.1601-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for More Government is not a Good P2P File Sharing preventative</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.1601</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/technology-and-science/more-government-is-not-a-good-p2p-file-sharing-preventative.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=1601" title="More Government is not a Good P2P File Sharing preventative" />
    <published>2005-02-17T14:21:58Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:28Z</updated>
    <title>More Government is not a Good P2P File Sharing preventative</title>
    <summary>Interesting analysis from the Cato Institute regarding government, DRM/copyright, and P2P (peer-to-peer networks).More government is not a good file-sharing preventativeMarriage of peer-to-peer networks and digital rights management is a better solutionWASHINGTON - Recent controversies over file-sharing and copyright policy have...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Technology and Science" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis from the Cato Institute regarding government, DRM/copyright, and P2P (peer-to-peer networks).<br /><br /><div><strong><font size="5"><span class="title"></span></font></strong></div><div><strong><font size="5"><span class="title">More government is not a good file-sharing preventative</span><br /></font></strong><em>Marriage of peer-to-peer networks and digital rights management is a better solution</em></div><div><p>WASHINGTON - Recent controversies over file-sharing and copyright policy have spawned hot debate in the courts and the halls of Congress, but a study issued today by the Cato Institute argues that government interference in Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks would hinder technological evolution. A better solution, according to the report, would be for government to step aside and allow the market to find a solution through digital rights management (DRM). <br /><br />In <a href="http://track1.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=77z,b3af,114l,9t9m,k2pi,bmyv,hmv4" title="http://track1.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=77z,b3af,114l,9t9m,k2pi,bmyv,hmv4">Peer-to-Peer Networking and Digital Rights Management: How Market Tools Can Solve Copyright Problems</a>,&quot; Michael A. Einhorn and Bill Rosenblatt illustrate how P2P technology and DRM can coexist peacefully in a market system, essentially quashing the complaints of consumer advocates who argue that DRM puts too much control in the hands of copyright holders. <br /><br />&quot;By preserving property rights made possible through new market techniques, DRM encourages producers to innovate because they are more certain of an eventual reward,&quot; the authors argue. As evidence, they offer the case of iTunes, Apple's pay-per-download music service that launched in 2003. &quot;The percentage of U.S. downloaders who actually paid for a song at one point or another increased from 8 percent to 22 percent in the first 12 months after the launch of iTunes,&quot; they write. <br /><br />Einhorn and Rosenblatt argue that these market operations are greatly preferable to government technology controls or mandatory compulsory licensing schemes for both producers and consumers. They write that &quot;an overly protective system of copyright is a detriment in the eyes of consumers who have grown accustomed to a range of copying capabilities, legally fair or not.&quot; <br /><br />Ultimately, the authors conclude that &quot;the government should act to protect property rights, including copyrights, but it should not pick winners or discourage any technology from competing in the new marketplace.&quot; <br /><br />Einhorn is author of <em>Media, Technology, and Copyright: Integrating Law and Economics</em>. Rosenblatt is president of GiantSteps Media Technology Strategies. <br /><br />Policy Analysis no 534: <a href="http://track1.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=77z,b3af,114l,9t9m,k2pi,bmyv,hmv4" title="http://track1.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=77z,b3af,114l,9t9m,k2pi,bmyv,hmv4">http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3670</a> </p><p class="contact"><b>Contact:</b><br /><b>Adam Thierer</b>, director of telecommunications studies, 202-789-5211<br /><b>Kristen Kestner</b>, media relations manager, 202-789-5212, <a href="mailto:kkestner@cato.org" title="mailto:kkestner@cato.org">kkestner@cato.org</a><br /><b>Evans Pierre</b>, director of broadcasting, 202-789-5204, <a href="mailto:epierre@cato.org" title="mailto:epierre@cato.org">epierre@cato.org</a></p><p class="footer"><em>The Cato Institute is a nonpartisan public policy research foundation dedicated to broadening policy debate consistent with the traditional American principles of individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace.</em></p></div></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
