More Government is not a Good P2P File Sharing preventative

Tom Keating : VoIP & Gadgets Blog
Tom Keating
CTO
| VoIP & Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP & gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, & opinions

More Government is not a Good P2P File Sharing preventative

Interesting analysis from the Cato Institute regarding government, DRM/copyright, and P2P (peer-to-peer networks).

More government is not a good file-sharing preventative
Marriage of peer-to-peer networks and digital rights management is a better solution

WASHINGTON - Recent controversies over file-sharing and copyright policy have spawned hot debate in the courts and the halls of Congress, but a study issued today by the Cato Institute argues that government interference in Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks would hinder technological evolution. A better solution, according to the report, would be for government to step aside and allow the market to find a solution through digital rights management (DRM).

In Peer-to-Peer Networking and Digital Rights Management: How Market Tools Can Solve Copyright Problems," Michael A. Einhorn and Bill Rosenblatt illustrate how P2P technology and DRM can coexist peacefully in a market system, essentially quashing the complaints of consumer advocates who argue that DRM puts too much control in the hands of copyright holders.

"By preserving property rights made possible through new market techniques, DRM encourages producers to innovate because they are more certain of an eventual reward," the authors argue. As evidence, they offer the case of iTunes, Apple's pay-per-download music service that launched in 2003. "The percentage of U.S. downloaders who actually paid for a song at one point or another increased from 8 percent to 22 percent in the first 12 months after the launch of iTunes," they write.

Einhorn and Rosenblatt argue that these market operations are greatly preferable to government technology controls or mandatory compulsory licensing schemes for both producers and consumers. They write that "an overly protective system of copyright is a detriment in the eyes of consumers who have grown accustomed to a range of copying capabilities, legally fair or not."

Ultimately, the authors conclude that "the government should act to protect property rights, including copyrights, but it should not pick winners or discourage any technology from competing in the new marketplace."

Einhorn is author of Media, Technology, and Copyright: Integrating Law and Economics. Rosenblatt is president of GiantSteps Media Technology Strategies.

Policy Analysis no 534: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3670

Contact:
Adam Thierer, director of telecommunications studies, 202-789-5211
Kristen Kestner, media relations manager, 202-789-5212, kkestner@cato.org
Evans Pierre, director of broadcasting, 202-789-5204, epierre@cato.org



Featured Events