After the recent Senate action forcing the FCC to back down from cutting off access to VoIP subscribers, it appears the FCC has found a new hoop for the VoIP service providers to jump through, which I will explain in a bit. The FCC decided to back down from forcing VoIP service providers to cut off callers who can't dial into the enhanced 911 network by the Nov. 28 deadline. In killing the e911 cutoff requirement, the FCC decided instead to require VoIP providers to file a letter detailing how much of their subscriber base can receive E911 service.
But in a move that seems like a response to the FCC's bruised ego, the FCC appears to be responding to the Senate ruling by coming up with a new impossible requirement for the VoIP service providers. I guess the FCC didn't like having to extend the cutoff deadline multiple times only to have the Senate step in and tell them "no, you can't do that". Talk about egg on the face. You want to know the new ridiculous requirement? Well, the FCC order states, "Although we do not require providers that have not achieved full 911 compliance by November 28, 2005, to discontinue the provision of interconnected VoIP service to any existing customers, we do expect that such providers will discontinue marketing VoIP service, and accepting new customers for their service, in all areas where they are not transmitting 911 calls to the appropriate PSAP in full compliance with the Commission’s rules."
In order words, if you live in a rural area you will NOT be able to sign up as a new customer to any VoIP service provider that does not provide e911 support in that area. The FCC expects VoIP companies to stop marketing their services and accepting new customers in areas that cannot perform E911 call routing. Even if this same area has "basic" 911 service, that isn't good enough for the FCC. So if you want to have inexpensive, feature-rich VoIP service from Vonage, Packet8, AT&T CallVantage, etc. you'd better sign up now before the deadline.
Gee, I wonder how this affects the Vonage IPO now that Vonage will be much more limited in new customer acquisition? Thank you Mr. FCC, you just hurt the wallet of all those Vonage insiders that were hoping to make millions on the Vonage IPO. Not that I care much for those holding any Vonage stock options...
And what's the deal with sucking up to the carriers? Look at this quote in the FCC's statement:
"In addition, the Bureau takes this opportunity to commend the steps undertaken by AT&T Corp. (AT&T), MCI, Inc. (MCI) and Verizon Communications, Inc. (Verizon) to comply with the Commission’s VoIP 911 provisioning requirements, as outlined in recent letters they filed in the above referenced dockets."
The FCC taking time to thank the traditional carriers? Gee, how nice. I smell a lobbying conspiracy against the VoIP service providers!
I realize AT&T has their highly-touted 911 "heartbeat" method which cuts off service until the customer enters in their location data, but AT&T is still limited by e911 coverage in rural areas as the rest of the VoIP service providers. So AT&T won't be able to add new CallVantage customers either in rural areas. Thank you FCC for your thanks, but no thanks. I can't help but think of Animal House's famous line: "Thank you sir (FCC), may I have another".
android apple asterisk at&t blackberry cell phone cisco dell digium e911 facebook fcc google google talk gps im ip-pbx ipad iphone ipod itexpo ITEXPO lync microsoft mobile phone open source outage phone review sip skype sony unified communications verizon video video conferencing voip vonage wireless xbox 360
- Apple (280)
- Bittorrent (2)
- Call Center and CRM (48)
- Computer Hardware (183)
- Computer Software (71)
- Gadgets (650)
- Google (225)
- Home Entertainment (263)
- Internet (173)
- Linux (111)
- Microsoft (376)
- MovableType (48)
- News (187)
- Personal and Humor (118)
- Politics (9)
- Reviews (246)
- Security (2)
- Social Networking (42)
- Sports/Outdoor Technology (9)
- Tablets (32)
- Technology and Science (355)
- Unified Communications (471)
- VoIP (2285)
- Wireless (584)
- p2p (20)
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
Featured Videos