<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/jangle-talkplus-on-the-ropes.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2008:/blog/tom-keating//4.36096-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for <![CDATA[Jangl &amp; TalkPlus Spell VoIP Troubles Ahead?]]></title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2008:/blog/tom-keating//4.36096</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/jangle-talkplus-on-the-ropes.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=36096" title="Jangl &amp; TalkPlus Spell VoIP Troubles Ahead?" />
    <published>2008-05-08T16:18:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-08T17:06:32Z</updated>
    <title>Jangl &amp; TalkPlus Spell VoIP Troubles Ahead?</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Om over at GigaOm writes that Jangl was looking to sell itself earlier this week and is &quot;headed towards an ignominious end&quot; and adds that Talkplus &quot;is going nowhere fast&quot;. I wrote a detailed write-up on TalkPlus, interviewing TalkPlus CEO...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="ITEXPO" />
    
    <category term="Skype" />
    
    <category term="TMCnet" />
    
    <category term="VoIP" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/07/like-jangl-talkplus-losing-its-voice-as-well/">Om over at GigaOm writes</a> that Jangl was looking to sell itself earlier this week and is &quot;headed towards an ignominious end&quot; and adds that Talkplus &quot;is going nowhere fast&quot;. I wrote a <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/talkplus-voice-20-app-launches.asp">detailed write-up on TalkPlus</a>, interviewing TalkPlus CEO Jeff Black at <a href="http://www.tmcnet.com/voip/conference/">ITEXPO</a> and my biggest fascination was how the supposedly reverse engineered Skype. I wrote, &quot;One final interesting thing we talked about at <a href="http://www.tmcnet.com/voip/conference/">ITEXPO</a> is that TalkPlus has built their own <strong>Skype gateway</strong>. In fact, when pressed further, Jeff mentioned they actually <em>reverse engineered</em> Skype's protocol. Although the <a href="http://www.tmcnet.com/tmcnet/snapshots/snapshots.aspx?Company=Skype">Skype</a> gateway isn't part of TalkPlus's launch today, Jeff explained that they have tested it in their labs and it's working very well.&quot;<br />
<br />
The TalkPlus Java application was designed to allow you to view the presence of your Skype buddies, initiate a Skype call or even receive a Skype call. It even has SIP support with the ability to support other IM/VoIP clients such as Google Talk, AIM, MSN Messenger, etc.<br />
<br />
It was cool technology, but perhaps a bit ahead of its time. One of the biggest features espoused by Jeff Black was &quot;throwaway numbers&quot;. As I wrote previously, you can ditch a number if need be. Doctors or lawyers that are calling patients/clients can use their personal mobile phone and yet have their office CallerID number appear to the client/patient instead of their personal mobile number. In essence, this is a form of <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/callerid-spoofing.asp">&quot;CallerID spoofing&quot;</a>, often a popular tactic used by hackers utilizing the <a href="http://www.asterisk,.org/">Asterisk</a> platform.<br />
<br />
Does the fall of Jangl and if Om is correct, the fall of TalkPlus spell trouble for VoIP/Voice 2.0 applications? Maybe we're not ready for VoIP applications. Maybe we just want cheap minutes. Maybe &quot;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_the_economy,_stupid">it's the cheap voice, stupid!</a>&quot; after all. Hmph... VoIP just got boring. <img alt="" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mtstatic/FCKeditor/emoticons/sad_smile.gif" />]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
