<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/firm-urges-banning-skype-in-the-enterprise.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.19625-</id>
  <updated>2013-02-22T21:05:46Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Firm urges banning Skype in the enterprise</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.19625</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/firm-urges-banning-skype-in-the-enterprise.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=19625" title="Firm urges banning Skype in the enterprise" />
    <published>2005-11-10T17:00:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:22Z</updated>
    <title>Firm urges banning Skype in the enterprise</title>
    <summary>Well, this industry analysy firm&apos;s stance on Skype blocking will certainly irk a few Skype fans. Technology industry analyst firm Info-Tech Research Group is telling enterprises to ban Skype - the freely-available Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) phone service -...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Skype" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Well, this industry analysy firm's stance on Skype blocking will certainly irk a few Skype fans. Technology industry analyst firm <a href="http://www.infotech.com">Info-Tech Research Group</a> is telling enterprises to ban Skype - the freely-available Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) phone service - from their organizations. &quot;Companies that are already banning peer-to-peer applications, such as instant messaging, should add Skype to its list of unsanctioned software programs,&quot; says Info-Tech analyst Ross Armstrong. <br /><br />&quot;Approximately 17 million registered Skype users are using the service for business purposes,&quot; says Armstrong. &quot;Unless an organization specifies instances where Skype use is acceptable, and outlines rules for client-side Skype settings, that's 17 million opportunities for a hacker to invade a corporate network.&quot; <br /><br />In a research note prepared for Info-Tech Research Group members, Armstrong outlines five reasons for an enterprise to ban Skype in a corporate environment:<br /><br />• Skype is not standards-compliant, allowing it and any vulnerability to pass through corporate firewalls.<br />• Skype's encryption is closed source and prone to man-in-the-middle attacks. There are also some unanswered questions about how well the keys are managed.<br />• Enterprises using Skype risk a communication barrier with countries and institutions that have already banned the service.<br />• Skype is undetectable, untraceable, and unauditable, putting organizations that are subject to compliance laws at risk. <br />• The question of whether VoIP calls constitute a business record is a legal quagmire. Throwing Skype into the communications mix further clouds the issue.<br /><br />Comments Armstrong, &quot;The bottom line is that even a mediocre hacker could take advantage of a Skype vulnerability. If you are going to use Skype within enterprise, manage it as you would any other IT service: with policy and diligence.&quot;</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.19625-comment:3980</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.19625" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/firm-urges-banning-skype-in-the-enterprise.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/firm-urges-banning-skype-in-the-enterprise.asp#c3980" />
    <title>Comment from Rick on 2005-11-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I better not step outside my house today...  I might get eaten by a lion.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-11-10T17:14:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.19625-comment:4005</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.19625" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/firm-urges-banning-skype-in-the-enterprise.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/firm-urges-banning-skype-in-the-enterprise.asp#c4005" />
    <title>Comment from Avid Skype User on 2005-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Avid Skype User</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>RE: Ban Skype<br />
Avid Skype User :</p>

<p>Banning Skype? Of course all other VOIP protcols would stand to gain and more even IT staff because all other VOIP technologies requires so much hardwares from a backbone and front end to make it work and you would be spending thousands of dollars for nothing.</p>

<p>Skype is the only product that truely lets you talk globally and roam globally without any cost.</p>

<p>Do you really think other protocols are more secure? Especially when any hacker can get into the open standard codes? To the contrary, to keep it secret and non-standard, we have more privacy and more security.<br />
Skype is undetectable and untraceable is completely false and missleading. Of course they have a record of your calls and who calls you. How do you think they can bill for skypeouts and bills the other person calling you?</p>

<p>It is quite irresponsible for a research company to issue such a childish statement.</p>

<p>Certain countries and institutions have banned the use of skype just because they are afraid of loosing the income generated from their state-owned telecom companies or in some cases they are afraid of Skype because they want to listen in and record maybe your conversations illegally.</p>

<p>So the more power to Skype if you value privacy and FREE communications for all !!! What a better way to free people's speech and encourage people to think and act globally !</p>

<p>How selfish it is to restrict the use of Skype. !!! It is like restricting people from using emails and telling them to start using more expensive and not-so much more secure ways to communicate !</p>

<p>Any technology, there are always a learning curve or a time to better it. So far no other technology have proven to be better.. The numbers of skype new users speaks for themselves !</p>

<p>So to all that denounces Skype, shame on you !</p>

<p>Let people choose what they want to use and stop issuing missleading statements that only demontstrates how backward and stone-aged your level of understanding is.</p>

<p>Since Skype has launched, millions of people around the world are now closer than ever and have saved hundreds of millions of phone calls bills. </p>

<p>People that never would call because of lack of resources and money are now regular callers. Skype is the most democratic killer app ever existed so leave it alone !</p>

<p>Thanks.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-11-13T20:06:55Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
