<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/skype-group-video-arrives.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2010:/blog/tom-keating//4.43944-</id>
  <updated>2013-02-22T21:04:23Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Skype Group Video Arrives!</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2010:/blog/tom-keating//4.43944</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/skype-group-video-arrives.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=43944" title="Skype Group Video Arrives!" />
    <published>2010-05-13T18:10:38Z</published>
    <updated>2010-05-13T18:23:31Z</updated>
    <title>Skype Group Video Arrives!</title>
    <summary>Today, Skype released a beta of their new software which enables group video for up to 5 video participants. This was a key feature missing by Skype that for years Skype fans (including myself) have complained about. Of course, Sightspeed,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Skype" />
    
    <category term="TMCnet" />
    
    <category term="Video Conferencing" />
    
    <category term="VoIP" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<span style="display: inline;" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img width="580" height="394" style="" class="mt-image-none" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/images/skype-group-video.jpg" alt="skype-group-video.jpg" /></span><br />Today, Skype <a href="http://blogs.skype.com/en/2010/05/group_video_calling.html">released a beta</a> of their new software which enables group video for up to 5 video participants. This was a key feature missing by Skype that for years Skype fans (including myself) have complained about. Of course, <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/logitech-acquires-sightspeed.asp">Sightspeed, now part of Logitech</a> has had multi-party video for a long time.<br /><br />Here's the kicker though from Skype's blog:<br /><blockquote><div>Group video calling is just one in a set of new <b>premium</b> features you'll  see us roll out during 2010. We haven't <b>set prices for these premium  features</b> yet, but rest assured that we're still absolutely committed to  bringing you <b>free voice and two-way video calling</b>.</div></blockquote>I bolded the relevant portions. So, group video is a "premium" feature and they plan to "set prices for these premium features"? So you'll have to pay for group video? Note how Skype adds they are "committed to  bringing you <b>free voice and two-way video calling." </b>Thus, it seems to me two-way video calls will be free, but indeed multi-party video will not be free.<br /><br />That could be a mistake. Skype should allow for free multiparty video -- for awhile at least. Let people try it and get used to it. Then maybe charge for it. Or maybe allow for low-quality multi-party group video and a premium charge for HD video. I just don't see consumers paying for group video. Enterprises - sure - but not consumers. If they want traction, they need to keep group video free for awhile.<br /><br />Download it <a href="http://www.skype.com/go/download-beta?cm_mmc=socialm|skypeblogs-_-global|intl|en-_-bigblog-_-groupvideocalling_para3">here</a>.]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2010:/blog/tom-keating//4.43944-comment:56578</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2010:/blog/tom-keating//4.43944" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/skype-group-video-arrives.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/skype-group-video-arrives.asp#c56578" />
    <title>Comment from Matt on 2010-05-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matt</name>
        <uri>http://www.makaicom.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.makaicom.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I will be curious as to how much bandwidth is used when viewing multiple HD streams.  I wonder if the codec will be able to scale up and down during the call to compensate for bandwidth fluctuations.</p>

<p>I agree that it should be free for a while, allow people to get hooked.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-05-13T19:55:50Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
