<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/tello-bites-the-dust.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.32184-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Tello bites the dust</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.32184</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/tello-bites-the-dust.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=32184" title="Tello bites the dust" />
    <published>2007-03-19T00:43:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:12Z</updated>
    <title>Tello bites the dust</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Tello, a Pulver-backed startup, apparently has packed it in. I covered Tello pretty in-depth last year (Jan 2006) in a skeptical article titled Tello, a near term solution? Apparently, it was very &quot;near term&quot; as it only lasted a little...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Microsoft" />
    
    <category term="TMCnet" />
    
    <category term="VoIP" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[Tello, a Pulver-backed startup, apparently has packed it in. I covered Tello pretty in-depth last year (Jan 2006) in a skeptical article titled <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/tello-a-near-term-solution.asp">Tello, a near term solution?</a> Apparently, it was very &quot;near term&quot; as it only lasted a little over a year. In my January post, I wrote, &quot;At first glance, this hosted solution to the IM interoperability dilemma seems like a great idea. However, it seems like a near-term solution to me. If the big IM players get their act together and decided to use the same <a href="http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/simple-charter.html">SIP/SIMPLE IETF standard</a>, which allows for presence sharing, you wouldn't even need Pulver's hosted solution. In addition, many of the IM players have <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/google/google-talk-now-federates.asp">announced federation plans already, including Google</a>.&quot;<br />
<br />
Further, now with Microsoft federating with Yahoo (and other federation deals), as well as Microsoft's Office Communications Server 2007 (OCS 2007) now in beta, a lot of functionality in Tello can be found in OCS 2007. I also wrote last year, &quot;Honestly, I'm not convinced a hosted service provider that centralizes and consolidates all of your presence information is going to be a &quot;killer app&quot; that people will pay a <span style="font-weight: bold;">monthly fee</span>.&quot; Apparently, I was right. I will say that users will pay for &quot;unified presence&quot; and &quot;unified communications&quot;, but I'm not convinced a hosted/rented presence solution is the answer.]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
