<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/top-3-make-it-top-5-common-voip-myths.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2013:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.33698-</id>
  <updated>2013-02-22T21:05:02Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Top 3... make it Top 5 Common VoIP Myths</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.33698</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/top-3-make-it-top-5-common-voip-myths.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=33698" title="Top 3... make it Top 5 Common VoIP Myths" />
    <published>2007-09-20T13:57:21Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:10Z</updated>
    <title>Top 3... make it Top 5 Common VoIP Myths</title>
    <summary>Steve Brown from Network Instruments, a relatively new blogger has a post describing common VoIP myths. He only has 3 though, so I&apos;ll add a couple which I&apos;ll continue with number 4... #4) VoIP&apos;s main purpose is to save on...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="VoIP" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[Steve Brown from Network Instruments, a relatively new blogger <a href="http://networkinstruments.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/common-voip-myths/">has a post </a>describing common VoIP myths. He only has 3 though, so I'll add a couple which I'll continue with number 4...<br />
<br />
<strong> #4) VoIP's main purpose is to save on long-distance charges. It's all about the almighty dollar. (or yen, pound, rupee, Euro, etc.)</strong><br />
While that may be true for residential VoIP, for business VoIP there are many more reasons, including converged applications, lower TCO due to easier moves/adds/changes, simple 3-4 digit dialing between multiple sites, and more.<br />
<br />
<strong> #5) VoIP calls have poorer voice quality than traditional landline calls.</strong><br />
With proper QoS in place, VoIP calls can actually have SUPERIOR voice quality than traditional landlines since landlines use G.711 which maxes out at 64kbps and&nbsp;is usually limited to 300 Hz to 3400 Hz frequency range. This limitation explains why traditional telephony speech sounds weak, unnatural, and lacks a certain &quot;crispness&quot;. Using wideband VoIP codecs on the other hand along with a wider frequency spectrum results in a cleaner, crisper, and more natural sounding speech.]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.33698-comment:29376</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.33698" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/top-3-make-it-top-5-common-voip-myths.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/top-3-make-it-top-5-common-voip-myths.asp#c29376" />
    <title>Comment from Orhan YILDIRIM on 2007-09-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Orhan YILDIRIM</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>#6) VoIP calls consume fixed bandwidth.</p>

<p>Bandwidth of a voip call is not fixed as in PSTN. There are factors such as codec, packet-time and silence suppression which affects the bandwidth of voip calls. Different codecs have different bandwidths (g711 64 kbps, g729 8 kbps, g923 5.3-6.3 kbps). Packet-time of voip call affects the number of packet-headers transmitted (10 msec packet-time means 100 packet-headers per second while 40 msec packet-time means 25 packet-headers). In a normal call, 40-60% of the time the party is in listening-mode means silent. So, if silence suppression is enabled 40-60% less bandwidth is consumed. There are still other factors which affects the bandwidth of voip call, such as underlying network (ethernet, ATM, etc.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-21T08:30:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.33698-comment:32162</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2007:/blog/tom-keating//4.33698" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/top-3-make-it-top-5-common-voip-myths.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/top-3-make-it-top-5-common-voip-myths.asp#c32162" />
    <title>Comment from Jim McQuaid on 2007-12-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jim McQuaid</name>
        <uri>http://www.networkperformancedaily.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.networkperformancedaily.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Myth # 7) If you implement QoS, all your VoIP worries are over.</p>

<p>QoS is critical, but it's not sufficient.  You have to have a way to understand the user experience talking on the phone.  Metrics like delay-to-dial tone, quality statistics for all calls and the like are some of the metrics you must have to be successful.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-18T22:58:58Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
