<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>On Rad&apos;s Radar? - politics Archives</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/politics/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2011-06-13:/on-rads-radar//51</id>
    <updated>2012-05-07T19:06:42Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Peter Radizeski of RAD-INFO, Inc. talking telecom, Cloud, VoIP, CLEC, and The Channel.</subtitle>

<entry>
    <title>VoIP Termination Squabble</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/05/voip-termination-squabble.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/on-rads-radar//51.49327</id>

    <published>2012-05-07T19:05:35Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-07T19:06:42Z</updated>

    <summary>On April 5, 2012, Sprint filed a petition for declaratory ruling raising a number of issues concerning the applicability of tariffed access rates to Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)-originated calls. (Issues that the FCC should have already put to bed!)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="compliance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="voip" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="centurylink" label="centurylink" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fcc" label="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="intercarriercompensation" label="inter-carrier compensation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lawsuit" label="lawsuit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sprint" label="sprint" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="voip" label="voip" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>On April 5, 2012, <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/bureau-seeks-comment-sprint-petition-declaratory-ruling">Sprint filed a petition for declaratory ruling</a> raising a number of issues concerning the applicability of tariffed access rates to Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)-originated calls. (Issues that the FCC should have already put to bed!) Basically, "Sprint is asking the FCC to decide whether it should pay CenturyLink for VoIP long-distance traffic. The question stems from a long-running federal lawsuit - filed in Nov. 2009 - CenturyLink filed against Sprint to enforce access tariffs on VoIP-originated calls." [<a href="http://www.fierceenterprisecommunications.com/story/sprint-centurylink-squabble-hits-fcc/2012-05-02" target="_blank">fiercetelecom</a>]</p><p>One of Sprint's points is: 
"because the VoIP originated traffic is jurisdictionally interstate, intrastate access tariffs cannot impose compensation obligations with respect to that traffic, even if those calls originate and terminate in the same state."</p><p>This issue was sort of addressed in 2010.</p><p><a href="http://www.kelleydrye.com/publications/client_advisories/0532" target="_blank">Kelley Drye explains</a> it: "On February 18, 2010, a federal district court stepped in to fill the gap left by the FCC's silence on the issue of whether transmission of Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP")-originated calls is an information service exempt from access charges or a telecommunications service subject to access charges. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia in PAETEC Communications, Inc. v. CommPartners, LLC held that the transmission and net protocol conversion of VoIP-originated calls is an information service not subject to access charges and that a tariff imposing such charges is ultra vires and lacks legal force."</p><p><a href="http://www.voiplogic.com/content418">VoIP Logic points</a> out that "the Court supported application of the FCC's $0.0007 reciprocal compensation cap, an amount to be paid for local traffic exchange between networks."</p><p>Other rulings have conflicted including <a href="http://www.dwt.com/advisories/Conflicting_Rulings_Fail_to_Clarify_VoIP_Compensation_Issue_02_19_2010/">the Pennsylvania PUC ruling</a>. More importantly, "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York reached an opposite conclusion in a suit pitting VoIP provider GlobalNAPs, Inc." against MetTel on March 31, 2010. "While acknowledging the findings in the CommPartners case, the court found that an inability to apply the tariff regime as did not preclude MetTel's entitlement to recover in equity for costs it assumed in terminating Global's traffic, and concluded that GlobalNAPs was not entitled to "unjust enrichment," e.g. was required to compensate MetTel for access." [<a href="http://www.voiplogic.com/content418">VoIP Logic</a>] GlobalNAPs petitioned the FCC for a ruling in 2010. The FCC has waffled as per usual.</p><p>They even waffled within months of each order. In October of 2011, <a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0206/FCC-11-161A1.pdf">this order</a> was released with the Connect America Fund order. Then on April 25, 2012, the FCC released a <a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0425/FCC-12-47A1.pdf">revised Connect America Fund Order</a> that revised the ICC/USF Reform. This order "permits local exchange carriers (LECs) to impose higher charges for originating intra-state toll calls that begin or end in VoIP format. Previously, in its USF/ICC Transformation Order the FCC determined that effective Dec. 29, 2011, originating access charges for such intrastate toll calls would be capped at the level of the LEC's normally lower interstate charges." <a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=a8c5c623-934c-420f-b51f-f7859ae06a71">JDSupra</a> continues to explain, "The FCC's new decision establishes a transitional rate rule, under which intrastate VoIP toll traffic will be subject to intrastate rates for approximately two years."  It all comes down to tariff rates, which, contrary to popular belief, can be updated at any time by the carrier and just need to be filed to be effective. (So when they hide behind the tariff, they are just saying they don't want to.)</p><p>If you are confused, you are not alone. Hence, why <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/bureau-seeks-comment-sprint-petition-declaratory-ruling">Sprint is petitioning the FCC</a>. Maybe some day it will finally be settled.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Some Stuff Happened While I Was on Daycation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/04/some-stuff-happened-while-i-was-on-daycation.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/on-rads-radar//51.49259</id>

    <published>2012-04-23T18:23:04Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-23T18:55:41Z</updated>

    <summary>I was taking today and tomorrow off to visit with some pals but the news won&apos;t quit.In the I-can&apos;t-stand-it zone, the University of Florida decides that TD&apos;s are more important than IT and cuts the Computer Science Department. Just when...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="agents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="cellular" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="data center" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="spectrum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="startup" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="wireless" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="cloudcomputing" label="cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="datacenter" label="data center" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mergers" label="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mvno" label="mvno" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="politics" label="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spectrum" label="spectrum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="vzw" label="vzw" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was taking today and tomorrow off to visit with some pals but the news won't quit.</p><p>In the I-can't-stand-it zone, the University of Florida decides that TD's are more important than IT and cuts the Computer Science Department. Just when Florida is playing host to the Rupublican Convention and is looking to make a name for itself, that name becomes DUM or MUD. In a time when we need more science and computer nerds, the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2012/04/22/university-of-florida-eliminates-computer-science-department-increases-athletic-budgets-hmm/" target="_blank">state U decides to go a different way</a>. </p><p>In Tampa, the former CEO of Savvis has closed his e-commerce company, Savtira, after a flurry of promises to hire 200 people and a number of odg and pony shows about the hot future. Apparently, he has done this before.</p><p>Cbeyond has decided that traditional agents are not its future. The Cloud has different demands and demands different partners.</p><p>Coresite bought Comfluent to enter the Denver market. "Comfluent plays a vital role in the interconnection community in the western U.S., serving more than 75 customers and managing the Rocky Mountain Internet eXchange (RMIX), the region's largest Internet exchange with access to more than 25 networks. Comfluent currently leases two sites that total approximately 9,300 NRSF," according <a href="http://www.sunherald.com/2012/04/20/3894928/coresite-enters-denver-market.html" target="_blank">to the SunHerald</a></p><p>Verizon Wireless wants its deal with the cablecos / SpectrumCo to go through, so it promised to sell off some spectrum. T-Mobile and others think that is just smoke and the deal should still be axed. [see <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57417425-94/verizons-700mhz-spectrum-may-not-be-so-valuable-after-all/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/news/ci_20424895/verizon-plans-auction-billions-worth-broadband-spectrum">there</a>]</p><p>Tucows, a domain registrar and fellow ISPCON standard, <a href="http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/ting-mvno-will-vary-bills-based-month-month-usage/2011-12-08">runs an MVNO called TING</a>.</p><p>Vodafone is bidding $1.7B USD to buy Cable & Wireless, according to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-23/vodafone-agrees-to-buy-cable-wireless-for-1-7-billion.html">Rueters</a></p><p>Linux talent will be important in 2013, especially in data centers, reports the <a href="http://www.channelinsider.com/c/a/Linux-and-Unix/The-Open-Source-Challenge-in-the-Channel-296362/">Channel Insider</a></p><p>Alex Doyle left Broadsoft for Polycom. Good luck at the new position, Alex!</p><p>from Tony: An <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2012/04/post-5.php">Insider's Guide to Technology Analysts</a></p><p>Dean Parker, CEO of Callis in Mobile, AL, <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/4/prweb9430849.htm">has been selected in the top 12 finalists for the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year award </a>for the Alabama/Tennessee/ Georgia region.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Union Reacts to AT&amp;T Layoffs </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/02/union-reacts-to-att-layoffs.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/on-rads-radar//51.48802</id>

    <published>2012-02-14T14:59:35Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-14T15:25:04Z</updated>

    <summary>Not my usual topic, but I thought I would point out the following, from Rebuild the Dream:&quot;AT&amp;T recently announced the &quot;surplus&quot; of 740 union AT&amp;T jobs despite their revenues soaring to $126.7 billion and a CEO that made over $27...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="att" label="att" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="economy" label="economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Not my usual topic, but I thought I would point out the following, from <a href="http://rebuildthedream.com/blog/2012/02/13/right-now-activists-risking-arrest-at-att-to-stop-layoffs/">Rebuild the Dream</a>:</p><p>"AT&T recently announced the "surplus" of 740 union AT&T jobs despite their revenues soaring to $126.7 billion and a CEO that made over $27 million in 2011." Nice!</p><p>Yesterday, 2/13/12, "30 activists just entered the AT&T Atlanta headquarters and are refusing to leave until every single greedy layoff is rescinded. Simultaneously, an occupation with tents is being set up outside of the building. Watch the Occupation of AT&T now: <a href="http://livestream.com/occupyAtlanta">http://livestream.com/occupyAtlanta</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>FCC is Busy!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/02/fcc-is-busy.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/on-rads-radar//51.48750</id>

    <published>2012-02-07T20:54:35Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-07T22:13:14Z</updated>

    <summary>.The FCC is really busy!The FCC is still working on Inter-Carrier Compensation. It ordered Rural Call Completion.It approved TWC&apos;s $3B bid for Insight. &quot;Time Warner Cable last August agreed to buy Insight for $3 billion in cash. The nation&apos;s No....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="CLEC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="broadband" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="cableco" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="compliance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="spectrum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="fcc" label="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fcc" label="fcc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="forbearance" label="forbearance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="intercarriercompensation" label="inter-carrier compensation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spectrum" label="spectrum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="usf" label="usf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="whitespaces" label="white spaces" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[.<img alt="FCC" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/images/fcc.gif" width="165" height="56" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /><p>The FCC is really busy!</p><p>The FCC is still working on Inter-Carrier Compensation. It <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/02/fcc-rules-on-rural.html">ordered Rural Call Completion</a>.</p><p>It approved TWC's $3B bid for Insight. "Time Warner Cable last August agreed to buy Insight for $3 billion in cash. The nation's No. 2 cable operator will acquire control of Insight by merging Insight into Derby Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of TWC, with Insight as the surviving entity, according to the FCC. Insight will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of TWC," according to <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/480049-FCC_Clears_Time_Warner_Cable_Takeover_of_Insight.php" target="_blank">Multi-Channel</a>.</p><p>The FCC is looking for <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/fcc-seeks-comment-nfl-blackout-rule-137803">comments on NFL Black out</a>. (So is the Florida Legislature, since the stadiums are publicly supported.) 16 games blacked out this year included 7 by my Bucs. That's not any way to treat fans or build up a fan base.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/30/north-carolina-launches-fcc-approved-tv-white-space-network-in-w/">Engadget reports</a>, "Back in December, the FCC approved the first white space device and database for the lucky city of Wilmington, North Carolina....Spectrum Bridge finally launched its TV White Space (TVWS) network in Carolina, as part of Wilmington's ongoing "Smart City" initiative."</p><p>The Lifeline program for low-income households has also been re-vamped by this Commission. There is a $25 million pilot program for Lifeline for broadband to see if there are cost savings. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/249062/fcc_overhauls_telephone_subsidy_for_the_poor_adding_broadband.html">PCworld</a>]</p><p>Clearly, the FCC is working on a lot of business. Here are some other topics:</p>
<ul>
	<li>USF Reform</li>
<li>Inter-Carrier Comp rules</li>
<li>VZW-SpectrumCo spectrum deal</li>
<li><a href="http://www.lightsquared.com/press-room/press-releases/lightsquared-files-petition-for-declaratory-ruling-asks-fcc-to-confirm-its-rights-as-spectrum-licensee/">LightSquared spectrum usage </a>and GPS interference</li>
<li><a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db1110/DA-11-1879A1.pdf">Reversal of Verizon's forbearance in 2006</a>>/li>
<li><a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0926/FCC-11-134A1.pdf">Next Gen 911 framework</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db1227/DA-11-2074A1.pdf">NANPA Numbering resources </a>(access to DID numbers)</li>
</ul>
<p>A lot to keep track of.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AT&amp;T Archive Video</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/01/att-archive-video.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/on-rads-radar//51.48595</id>

    <published>2012-01-30T23:42:40Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-31T00:02:32Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[From the AT&amp;T archives: "A fascinating animated film explaining the perspective of the Bell System made during the legal challenges of the 1970s from both the government and other phone companies. "The MackNell Quandary from 1975 about the greatness of...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="PR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="att" label="att" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mergers" label="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pr" label="pr" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://techchannel.att.com/archives" target="_blank">the <span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span>archives</a>: "A fascinating animated film explaining the perspective of the Bell System made during the legal challenges of the 1970s from both the government and other phone companies. "</p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1VdNbK_Qea8?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><p>The MackNell Quandary from 1975 about the greatness of monopoly. I guess this was propaganda before <span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span>was broken up.</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>It&apos;s a Mobile Monday</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/01/its-a-mobile-monday.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/on-rads-radar//51.48591</id>

    <published>2012-01-30T16:51:18Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-30T17:23:40Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s a mobile Monday as I get set to pack up to head to ITEXPO East 2012 in Miami Beach. Yahoo was being Yahoo this morning as it announced - in the same breath - that it has launched a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="apps" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="cellular" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="spectrum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="wimax" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="wireless" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="4g" label="4g" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="apps" label="apps" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="att" label="att" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cellular" label="cellular" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fcc" label="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="financials" label="financials" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spectrum" label="spectrum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sprint" label="sprint" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="vz" label="vz" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="yahoo" label="yahoo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's a mobile Monday as I get set to pack up to head to <span class="caps">ITEXPO</span> East 2012 in Miami Beach.</p>
<p>Yahoo was being Yahoo this morning as it announced - in the same breath - that it has <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/30/yahoo-shuts-down-10-mobile-apps-says-its-going-mobile-first/" target="_blank">launched a "Mobile First" mindset</a>, then shut down 10 mobile apps. Granted, some of them were not doing well (like Yahoo itself), but it's schizophrenic to do it on the same day.</p>
<p>Patent house <a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/52800.php" target="_blank">Klausner Technologies sues MetroPC</a>S for Visual Voicemail Infringement. That's always fun - and profitable for the patent house. Hopefully, in this case, it doesn't mess up the consumers' experiences.</p>
<p><span class="caps">AT&T </span>is now <a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021856812" target="_blank">supporting <span class="caps">DISH</span> Network at the </a><span class="caps"><a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021856812" target="_blank">FCC</a> </span>on its deployment and usage of spectrum in the 2 GHz range that it acquired from bankruptcy court via TerreStar Networks and <span class="caps">DBSD</span> North America. In <a href="http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/att-circling-dish-carrier-argues-against-restrictions-dishs-spectrum/2012-01-30" target="_blank">the Fierce article</a>, it is suggested that the support is because AT&T has eyes for DISH spectrum. And as you have read, the rumor mill has AT&T bidding on DISH - for less than what T-Mobile would have cost. It will depend on the FCC rules on the spectrum.</p>
<p>Both Verizon and AT&T had bad quarters. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/27/technology/atts-net-loss-tied-to-t-mobile-merger-fees.html?_r=1" target="_blank">AT&T attributed its $6.7B bad quarter</a> to its $3B T-Mobile acquisition break-up fee. Some of it may be due to having too much focus on the merger you thought for certain was going to pass. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/24/us-verizon-idUSTRE80N0YT20120124" target="_blank">VZ blamed pension liabilitie</a>s on its loss. <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/windstream-changes-pension-accounting-method-2012-01-25" target="_blank">Windstream changed its pension accounting method</a>.</p>
<p>Not for nothing, but the pension liabilities that VZ and CenturyLink (via Embarq) owe SHOULD have been funded all along -- not in lump sum, quarter killing fashion. I wonder if this is a boat anchor that will sink them?</p>
<p>While <a href="http://www.cnet.com/8301-17918_1-57367751-85/hey-at-t-quit-whining/" target="_blank">AT&T whines at the FCC</a> about a "clear spectrum policy", can I remind that of a few things? One, you have spectrum. Deploy what you have! And try not to mismanage it this time, so your top execs don't have to explain it to Congress again! Two, what spectrum do you want auctioned off? There simply, at this time, isn't any. You and your ilk have bought it all up, horded it, did not deploy it, and screwed the pooch that is mobile data networks in America. Your pals at CTIA didn't plan well for the future either. Did you think that the spectrum was unlimited?</p>
<p>In more AT&T whining, there is <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/ATT+Calls+Sprint+a+FreeLoader+Accuses+US+Govt+of+Meddling/article23862.htm" target="_blank">this article</a> about the roaming rules and how Sprint is free-loading. My understanding about spectrum was that deployment was required - with an expiration date. What happened to that? Where is the enforcement?</p>
<p>In cool news: <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19736_7-57366945-251/sprints-next-tablet-to-be-$100-zte-optik/" target="_blank">Sprint has a $100 7-inch ZTE Android tablet coming out</a>!</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Privacy versus Security</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/01/privacy-versus-security.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/on-rads-radar//51.48414</id>

    <published>2012-01-25T20:51:22Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-25T21:58:35Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA["Concerned about privacy? Maybe you should be concerned about the economy instead. That was the subtext of a keynote speech by Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook&rsquo;s chief operating officer, at a technology conference in the heart of Europe." [Benton] Not to get...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="outage" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="privacy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="security" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="economy" label="economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="politics" label="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="privacy" label="privacy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="security" label="security" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Concerned about privacy? Maybe you should be concerned about the economy instead. That was the subtext of a keynote speech by Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook&rsquo;s chief operating officer, at a technology conference in the heart of Europe." [<a href="http://benton.org/node/111523" target="_blank">Benton</a>]</p>
<p>Not to get political, but privacy is a ship that has sailed. Google, Facebook and other sites track online activities. Credit card companies and Paypal can track both offline and online activities. CarrierIQ software on cell phones is able to see every keystroke. <span class="caps">GPS </span>tracking on devices, including your TomTom. Cellphone and Internet logging by <span class="caps"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">ISP'</span></span></span>s for government agencies track you.</p>
<p>I'm not suggesting we just give up on privacy. I am suggesting that we take the advice of Sandberg and start focusing on the important stuff. Maybe Security is the Important stuff.</p>
<p>When Wikipedia went dark in the face of <span class="caps"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">SOPA </span></span></span>and <span class="caps"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">PIPA </span></span></span>bills, it caused many supporters in DC to publicly back away. Privately, however, they will back <a href="http://tales-of-the-sausage-factory.wetmachine.com/what-the-sotu-piracy-reference-means-back-in-the-ustr-with-special-301-and-the-trans-pacific-partnership-agreement/" target="_blank">TransPacific Partnership, <span class="caps"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">ACTA </span></span></span>and other bills</a>. Why? Hollywood and content companies want it. Just another example of industry influence over voters or common sense in <span class="caps"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">DC.</span></span></span></p>
<p>In the midst of the privacy talk, why isn't there more talk about security? The latest breach at <a href="http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=4406" target="_blank">Zappos affected 24 million</a>. Laptops and cellphones are lost daily. Experts agree that <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/vulnerabilities/232400392?itc=edit_in_body_cross" target="_blank">mobile threats and breaches are inevitable</a>. We don't need more rules or laws, we have plenty now, including <span class="caps"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">HIPAA </span></span></span>and <span class="caps"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">PCI DSS.</span></span></span> We need enforcement and monitoring - or really big fines.</p>
<p>There are simple methods for security available, it might be time to do so. "<a href='http://www.windstreambusiness.com/blog/2011/12/are-your-passwords-on-the-naughty-list" target=_blank">Worldwide, Norton estimates that cybercrime costs the global economy $338 billion a year</a>." Think about the boost to jobs and the <span class="caps"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">GDP</span></span></span>!</p>
<p>Users need to be aware and educated to their part. Password management and enforcement is an important foundation. <a href="http://www.techjournalsouth.com/2011/12/consumer-reports-four-tips-for-creating-stronger-passwords/" target="_blank">Here is a good article about passwords</a>. <a href="http://www.techjournalsouth.com/2011/12/five-things-every-consumer-should-know-about-comparing-antivirus-programs/" target="_blank">This one is about anti-virus software</a>, just another step in the security game. (Updated operating systems being another step.) Simple software is availbale like Computrace and Prey to remotely wipe laptops.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the popular perspective is to decrease costs and "this will never happen to me." The shift would mean that telecom sales staffs would need to start selling insurance. What is managed security but insurance? That's a tough shift. It has to happen but it is a tough shift.</p>
<p>""I am angry. There are real problems facing the world, and we, as a society, are not doing enough to address them in the right ways, not the ways we know are possible. The old way isn't working, and we know it." This is the opening paragraph to a new <a href="http://changethis.com/manifesto/show/90.03.ShiftReset">ChangeThis manifesto titled Shift &amp; Reset</a> by Brian Reich. "What might be possible if we were really committed, as individuals and as a society?"</p>&lt;p.We focus on the wrong things. If you focus on your employees and customers and what you can do to benefit them, profit rolls in -- not the other way around!</p><p>From <a href="http://changethis.com/manifesto/show/90.05.SocialMediaSales">another ChangeThis manifesto</a>, "The real business opportunity is to become more relevant and meaningful to customers in ways that create sales."</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title> End Caps</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2012/01/end-caps.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2012:/on-rads-radar//51.48336</id>

    <published>2012-01-21T14:49:32Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-21T17:05:57Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[This was the week that we learned that online protesting can work -- if enough people get involved and if you get the support of some powerhouse websites like Google and Wikipedia. It looks like SOPA was dropped&nbsp;and the vote...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="TCA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="agents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="backup" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="channel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="colocation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="commissions" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="data center" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="saas" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="vc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="agents" label="agents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cloudcomputing" label="cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="collocation" label="collocation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="commissions" label="commissions" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="datacenter" label="data center" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="managedservices" label="managed services" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tca" label="TCA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="vc" label="vc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[This was the week that we learned that online protesting can work -- if enough people get involved and if you get the support of some powerhouse websites like Google and Wikipedia. It looks like <a href="http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/20/congressman-lamar-smith-kills-sopa-after-massive-internet-outrage/" target="_blank">SOPA was dropped</a>&nbsp;and the vote on PIPA was delayed. (It is still alive due to Democrat lawmakers who are beholden to Hollywood like Florida Senator Bill Nelson. If he knew how to turn on his laptop by himself I could understand it, but come on!)<br /><br />We don't really need any more copyright laws. If we did, would <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/technology/founder-of-shuttered-file-sharing-site-sought-limelight.html?ref=technology" target="_blank">the feds have been able to fly to New Zealand to arrest the owner</a> of MegaUpload? What was he arrested and renditioned for? Online piracy.&nbsp;<br /><br />Not for nothing, but don't we have more important things to be spending federal dollars on? We are a nation with lost priorities.<br /><br />And yet another carrier joins the CLOUD: "US Signal recently released an Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) product offering, what US Signal calls <a href="http://www.ussignalcom.com/products/managed-data-center" target="_blank">Managed Data Center</a>. Customers have increasingly requested US Signal to host their applications, for financial reasons, scalability, security, and more."<br /><br />Yesterday, <a href="http://tcasite.org" target="_blank">TCA</a> held its monthly agent webinar with Netwolves presenting on Managed Services. With most of the telcos offering Managed Servcies, we at TCA thought it was time to give an overview of what Managed Services are from carriers, who is buying them and how does an Agent sell them. How does an Agent start that conversation with the prospect about managed services? The webinar was recorded and <a href="http://tcasite.org/calendar.htm" target="_blank">TCA members</a> can play it back at any time.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nemertes.com/reports/coming-colo-crunch-why-demand-data-center-colocation-could-exceed-supply" target="_blank">Nemertes Research predicts a shortage of colocation</a> space in the U.S. beginning this year. That is likely because some colo space is being used for PAAS and IAAS. Also, some colo houses don't want to sell colo any more because there is more cash in xAAS. (Or so they say.) I have seen that trying to find single rack colo slots are getting more difficult. Personally, I thought that when Amazon, Facebook, Google and others built their data centers, a lot of space would be opened up in other data centers.&nbsp;<br /><br />The other issue with colocation is that Equinix, InterNAP and now Savvis have cut the channel out of selling their space. Other data centers - like Vegas' SwitchNAP - are difficult to deal with. That kind of affects colo sales, too. &nbsp;Luckily, ViaWest and TELX are still agent friendly.<br /><br /><a href="http://code42.com/about.html" target="_blank">Code 42</a> Software, a cloud backup service named Crashplan, <a href="http://www.crashplan.com/blog/code42/accelfunding" target="_blank">got $52M in funding from Accel Partners.</a>&nbsp;It seems a massive amount of funding for an online backup company.<br /><br />Is <a href="http://betanews.com/2012/01/20/dont-look-now-but-5g-may-be-right-around-the-corner/" target="_blank">5G around the corner</a>? Heck, most of the US is still in 2.5G-3G land. &nbsp;&nbsp;]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why I Was Going to Run for Congress</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2011/12/why-i-was-going-to-run-for-congress.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2011:/on-rads-radar//51.48049</id>

    <published>2011-12-10T16:35:25Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-12T15:50:33Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[This is kind of a political rant, so fair warning and I apologize if I offend you in advance. Voter Suppression,&nbsp;media green zones&nbsp;like in Baghdad (and&nbsp;here),&nbsp;indefinite detention of Americans by military, the&nbsp;revolving door between lobbyists and government,&nbsp;SOPA,&nbsp;Congressional insider trading, shorting...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="off topic" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="congress" label="congress" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="economy" label="economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="politics" label="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="radizeski" label="radizeski" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rant" label="rant" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is kind of a political rant, so fair warning and I apologize if I offend you in advance.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/dec/06/naacp-exposes-voter-suppression-scheme" target="_blank">Voter Suppression</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/region_tampa/RNC-invited-journalists-to-plan-at-Forum" target="_blank">media green zones</a>&nbsp;like in Baghdad (and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.newser.com/story/135117/charlotte-nc-aims-to-curb-occupy-protests-at-2012-democratic-national-convention.html" target="_blank">here</a>),&nbsp;<a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/indefinite-detention-of-american-citizens-coming-soon-to-battlefield-u-s-a-20111209?link=mostpopular5" target="_blank">indefinite detention of Americans by military</a>, the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111209/10151917022/shockingly-unshocking-two-congressional-staffers-who-helped-write-sopapipa-become-entertainment-industry-lobbyists.shtml" target="_blank">revolving door between lobbyists and government</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=sopa" target="_blank"><span class="caps">SOPA</span></a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2011-12-06/insider-trading-bill-congress/51683824/1" target="_blank">Congressional insider trading</a>, shorting on the debt ceiling, re-districting to keep power - aren't we tired of this crap yet? I am. Very tired. DC and state capitals are owned and run by career politicians and lobbyists. This truly is Corporate America or America, Inc.</p>
<p>I have spent the last few weeks trying to decide if I should run for Congress. I spoke with several campaign people in Tampa Bay as well as a few close friends, family and advisors. Despite my being a registered Democrat - and most of the folks I spoke with being Republican &ndash; everyone was very supportive, some even a little too giddy at the idea of me running for Congress.</p>
<p>I bitch about politics, so I figured I needed to get involved. More accurately, I want to fix it. It&rsquo;s a tall order. Either you are a part of the problem (empathy, not voting, blaming) or part of the solution. I want to be a part of the solution.</p>
<p>I have to tell you that what I learned is that the process to run for office is challenging. It takes a lot of money to run for office. A standard Congressional seat needs a minimum of $1.3 million dollars for staff, advertising, printing, office and travel. That's a minimum. The candidate will be asking for money 4 to 6 hours per day, every day. The candidate will be stumping, at events, at churches, in neighborhoods, seven days a week, long days, for a year.  There's no way my business would survive that schedule. And anything less than going 110% just isn't in my <span class="caps">DNA.</span> I want to win, even on projects with clients - I want a win. I want a positive outcome.</p>
<p>A few people told me to start small - like a county seat - but the point is: I don't want to be a career politician! They are the problem! We have politicians, not Statesmen. It&rsquo;s a Big difference.</p>
<p>The other problem is the national blame game. &ldquo;It's the Dems!&rdquo; &ldquo;It's the <span class="caps">GOP</span>!&rdquo; <span class="caps">PUH</span>-lease! The difference between the two parties is slim at best. Take the politics out of it and look at the issues: healthcare, education, economy, foreign policy, term limits, civil liberties and the US Constitution.</p>
<p>I could point out that in 1992 the Clinton Administration was trying to design a healthcare solution, but the <span class="caps">GOP </span>stalemated the whole Clinton Administration, like it is doing to the Obama Administration now. But that&rsquo;s being political. The issue is that the elected Congress Critters are <span class="caps">NOT </span>doing their <span class="caps">JOB</span>! Stalemating isn&rsquo;t governing. We have real issues in the country that need to be fixed before we begin a slide into third world status.</p>
<p>People forget that the US economy is service based. The Bush tax cuts put money back in consumers &ndash; not voters, Consumers &ndash; pockets. Why? So they would spend it in our economy, since our economy is built on consumers buying stuff. Wal-Mart, McDonalds, Apple, Microsoft, etc. require the US consumer to buy their stuff. And to buy more of it every quarter in order to maintain the stock price for the fat cats on Wall Street. (I won&rsquo;t go on a tangential rant about how Wall Street only extracts value from the economy.)</p>
<p>When the Middle Class gets squeezed, there is less money being spent in the economy. I wrote a while back about how banks, credit card companies and insurance companies had reached their peaks, when the economy was humming along on the real estate bubble up to June of 2006. Since then, it has been downhill for these companies and they have to find new ways to make money from the shrinking number of customers. (That would be you!)</p>
<p>Small businesses don&rsquo;t think about raising prices to make more revenue or how to add fees to customers&rsquo; bills to make a few extra dollars. Only public companies think that way, since they are a slave to Wall Street.</p>
<p>What happens when the economy slows down further??</p>
<p>Here&rsquo;s a scenario for you: the payroll tax cut doesn&rsquo;t get renewed, the holiday credit card bills arrive in January to lucky that are still employed but now with less take home pay. Whoops! Now even less money for restaurants, gas, food, lottery, etc. This cycle ends up with small businesses closing. McDonalds won&rsquo;t close, but a franchise may close. Wal-Mart won&rsquo;t close, but a few mom-and-pops will. BP won&rsquo;t close, but the gas station owners may. Now we have more unemployment, more vacant buildings, and more burdens on society, which ripples to more bankruptcies and foreclosures. The pool of people paying for the largesse is shrinking. It&rsquo;s a mess. In addition, small business is the job growth engine, not large business. As small business dies, so does job growth and the economy.</p>
<p>But can a freshman Congressman make a difference? Not likely alone. He or she would need help from a lot of places.</p>
<p>Am I going to run? Not this time. I would need a lot of money. My business would suffer. The spotlight and mudslinging would be annoying. The political process is daunting, so I am going to get my feet wet by helping others this time round. I am going to shed some light on the DC mess and make some noise (not here, don&rsquo;t worry). I also may be joining these three organizations:  <a href="http://www.nolabels.org" target="_blank">NoLabels</a>, <a href="http://www.rebuildthedream.com/" target="_blank">Rebuild the Dream</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.buildyouramerica.org" target="_blank">My America</a>.<br /><br />What do you want Your America to look like in 5 years? What are you doing to get it there? The elected are not leading us; they are screwing us down the river. Ranting on twitter, FB and your blog is fun, but action is where the tires meet the road. You can make fun of Occupy but at least they got up and did something. Are you?<br /><br />And voter ignorance in this country is epidemic. See <a href="http://www.cato.org/event.php?eventid=1662" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/national/articles/2008/06/03/the-ignorant-american-voter" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://quilligrapher.hubpages.com/hub/Voter-Ignorance" target="_blank">here</a>. Maybe it is head in the sand defense against so much going wrong that is out of our control or maybe it is that we are getting so dumb as a nation that we can't grasp the debt any more than we can balance our check book or maybe it is an attention deficit society looking for immediate gratification.&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Mergers Cost Jobs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2011/12/mergers-cost-jobs.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2011:/on-rads-radar//51.48031</id>

    <published>2011-12-07T16:25:29Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-07T18:40:32Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[In the wake of AT&amp;T getting caught misleading the federal agencies about the benefits of its merger with T-Mobile (FCC report here), we see that the merger of PAETEC and Windstream has already resulted in job losses.Windstream cuts 58 jobs...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="telco" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="att" label="att" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cellular" label="cellular" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jobs" label="jobs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mergers" label="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="paetec" label="paetec" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="windstream" label="windstream" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In the wake of <span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span>getting caught misleading the federal agencies about the benefits of its merger with T-Mobile (<a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db1130/DA-11-1955A2.pdf" target="_blank"><span class="caps">FCC </span>report here</a>), we see that the merger of <span class="caps">PAETEC </span>and Windstream has already resulted in job losses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/news/2011/12/02/windstream-to-close-palm-harbor-office.html" target="_blank">Windstream cuts 58 jobs at Palm Harbor office</a> is just the start of at least 280 jobs being cut from its combined workforce of 14,500. Synergies require job cuts. <a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/business/2011/dec/07/tdbiz01-cavalier-telephone-owner-to-cut-jobs-end-n-ar-1525426/" target=_blank">Richmond is losing 70</a>. Even Rochester is losing 52 jobs, <a href="http://www.13wham.com/news/local/story/PAETEC-Merger-Complete-Now-It-s-Windstream/UNF2kPZZT0WHWejjFtjgwg.cspx?autoplay=1" target=_blank">according to 13 <span class="caps">WHAM</span> TV</a>.</p><p>Mergers can't work without job losses, office closings, and other economic detriment. It is what it is, but don't put lipstick on it and try to sell the pig as a boon to anyone but your shareholders. And I think that means short term shareholders, because mounting debt combined with flat markets and more competition in a climate of stagnate job growth means the long term picture is worse than the pig.</p><img alt="lipstick_pig_080910_mn.jpg" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/lipstick_pig_080910_mn.jpg" width="320" height="240" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /><p>Now <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottcleland/2011/12/05/top-ten-flaws-in-fccs-attt-mobile-competition-analysis/">the <span class="caps">ILEC </span>mouthpieces</a> are writing about how unfair the <span class="caps">FCC </span>report was. Really? Because the <span class="caps">FCC </span>staff had 2 million pages of documents from <span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span>and T-Mobile to sift through, including <a href="http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/08/leaked-att-filing-fuels-critics-claims-that-t-mobile-acquisition-is-anticompetitive.php">the "smoking gun memo"</a> that said <span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span>didn't need to buy T-Mobile, it could spend one-tenth the $39B price tag to build out the network itself. <span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span>also admitted to Congress that it mismanaged its network. They <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2011/10/theres-no-spectrum-shortage.html">all have spectrum</a>. Or be like <span class="caps">VZW </span>and <a href="http://www.wirelessweek.com/News/2011/12/Carriers-Spectrum-Swap-Worth-100-Million-Leap-Wireless-Verizon-Wireless/" target=_blank">buy it from Leap</a> and SpectrumCo - or LightSquared or <span class="caps">DISH </span>et al.</p><p>And let's not forget one big thing: both cellcos have lousy customer service records. That <span class="caps">HARMS </span>consumers. The <span class="caps">FTC, DOJ </span>and <span class="caps">FCC </span>were established to protect <span class="caps">CONSUMERS, </span>not other companies (Sprint) or shareholders. We have very little (real) competition in telecom.</p><p>Final thought: Most mergers fail!</p><p>It isn't about bigger. It's about Better. Zappos grew to a $1B with great culture and customer service. Say that about a telco.</p><p>It isn't about bigger. Ask Intermedia (ICI, the first billion dollar <span class="caps">CLEC </span>that had to sell to <span class="caps">MCI</span>) or <span class="caps">PAETEC </span>(the company that Arunas Chesonis said needed to be a billion dollar company. For what?). It's about Innovation. Ask a company in the Duopoly about Innovation.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Sprint Deals With Clearwire</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2011/12/sprint-deals-with-clearwire.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2011:/on-rads-radar//51.48018</id>

    <published>2011-12-05T21:50:07Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-05T21:59:16Z</updated>

    <summary>The best details of the Sprint-Clearwire deal is at Marketwatch, but Tammy Wolf at TMC did a good job, too. Clearwire gets &quot;up to $1.6 billion over the next four years in payments for WiMAX services, possible pre-payments for LTE...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="cellular" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="spectrum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="wimax" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="wireless" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="cableco" label="cableco" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="clearwire" label="clearwire" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sprint" label="sprint" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="vzw" label="vzw" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="wimax" label="wimax" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The best details of the Sprint-Clearwire deal is at <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sprint-and-clearwire-announce-new-agreements-2011-12-01" target="_blank">Marketwatch</a>, but <a href="http://www.tmcnet.com/topics/articles/226854-sprints-move-4g-will-leave-clearwire-behind-2012.htm" target="_blank">Tammy Wolf at <span class="caps"><span class="caps">TMC</span></span></a> did a good job, too. Clearwire gets "up to $1.6 billion over the next four years in payments for WiMAX services, possible pre-payments for <span class="caps">LTE </span>services and potential equity investments" from Sprint. "Sprint will pay Clearwire a total of $926 million, approximately two-thirds of which will be paid in 2012, for unlimited 4G WiMAX retail services during 2012 and 2013, subject to certain conditions." So Clearwire is stuck with WiMAX until like 2015 while also building an <span class="caps">LTE </span>network. The speculation begins: is $1.6B enough for Clearwire? Who will buy the bundle (Sprint-Clearwire)? The Senate wants to know more about Lightsquared. <span class="caps">DISH </span>wants someone to build it an <span class="caps">LTE </span>network. <span class="caps">VZW </span>picked up the SpectrumCo 20 MHz from the cablecos. The cablecos will now be selling <span class="caps">VZW </span>services to its customers as an authorized <span class="caps">VZW </span>sales agent. (Isn't that stupid?)</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Lots of News (I Can&apos;t Cover in Detail)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2011/12/lots-of-news-i-cant-cover-in-detail.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2011:/on-rads-radar//51.48017</id>

    <published>2011-12-05T21:30:14Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-06T17:06:15Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Dag Peak explains the difference between BroadTouch and BroadCloud by BSFT. That Carrier IQ key logging software has Sprint and AT&amp;T caught in lawsuits. This privacy issue reminds me of the cigarette suits -- keep suing and when you win...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="broadband" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="broadsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="privacy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="broadband" label="broadband" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="broadsoft" label="broadsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fcc" label="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="intercarriercompensation" label="inter-carrier compensation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="news" label="news" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="usf" label="usf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/117598896449575635891/posts/FMk4g4ZH5fJ" target="_blank">Dag Peak explains the difference</a> between BroadTouch and BroadCloud by <span class="caps"><span class="caps">BSFT.</span></span></p>
<p>That <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-05/at-t-sprint-sued-by-customers-over-carrier-iq-tracking-software.html" target="_blank">Carrier IQ key logging software has Sprint and <span class="caps"><span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span></span>caught in lawsuits</a>. This privacy issue reminds me of the cigarette suits -- keep suing and when you win one, you crack the whole thing open and huge sweeping change must follow. So lawyers start your engines and get out those lawsuits! (Like I have to tell you to.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/obama-names-democrats-rosenworcel-gops-pai-to-fcc/2011/10/31/gIQAKG5raM_blog.html" target="_blank">Obama names new <span class="caps"><span class="caps">FCC </span></span>nominees for Senate approval</a>. Copps is term limited and Meredith Baker left for a lucrative job at Comcast! (No conflict of interest there, just part of the revolving door in <span class="caps"><span class="caps">DC.</span></span>)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/CenturyLink-is-Imposing-Usage-Caps-117116" target="_blank">CenturyLink adds broadband caps</a> to compete better with Cox, who does too.</p>
<p>I'm still working on my blog post about this:  <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-connect-america-fund-order-reforms-usficc-broadband" target="_blank"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">FCC</span></span> Releases Connect America Fund Order, Reforms <span class="caps"><span class="caps">USF</span></span>/ICC for Broadband</a></p><p>It's a week where <span class="caps">SAP </span>feels like Ron Paul, because its cloud acquisition got about 90 seconds of space. <span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span>has to feel like Herman Cain, after the <span class="caps">FCC </span>released its report about why the cellular merger was a no-go. Is <span class="caps">VZW </span>like Romney for quietly scooping up the cableco spectrum <span class="caps">AND </span>getting them to sell <span class="caps">VZW </span>services?! T-Mobile is quietly in the corner like Bachmann trying to figure out the next move.</p><p><span class="caps">UPDATE</span>:  new <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Ting-The-Less-Evil-Wireless-Carrier-117305" target="_blank">Sprint <span class="caps">MVNO </span>coming from Tucows called Ting</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AT&amp;T Sneaks One In</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2011/11/att-sneaks-one-in.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2011:/on-rads-radar//51.47943</id>

    <published>2011-11-28T03:24:31Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-29T16:12:10Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[AT&amp;T sneaks in a note that says they set aside $4B for a break-up fee during the Thanksgiving break. AT&amp;T withdrew its petition from the FCC as they wait to see what happens with the DOJ and the lawsuit. UPDATE:...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="antitrust" label="antitrust" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="att" label="att" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fcc" label="FCC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mergers" label="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="caps"><span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span></span>sneaks in a note that says <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/24/technology/att_t-mobile_breakup_fee/index.htm" target="_blank">they set aside $4B for a break-up fee</a> during the Thanksgiving break. <span class="caps"><span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span></span>withdrew its petition from the <span class="caps"><span class="caps">FCC </span></span>as they wait to see what happens with the <span class="caps"><span class="caps">DOJ </span></span>and the lawsuit.</p>
<img class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/ATTBuysTMobile.jpg" alt="ATTBuysTMobile.jpg" width="184" height="138" />
<p><span class="caps"><span class="caps">UPDATE</span></span>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/liberal-groups-fcc-dont-let-att-hook-136750" target="_blank"><span class="caps"><span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span></span>is in a tiff with the <span class="caps"><span class="caps">FCC </span></span>over the merger application withdrawal</a>. The <span class="caps"><span class="caps">FCC </span></span>may not let them withdraw it now. This should be interesting. Maybe the <span class="caps"><span class="caps">FCC </span></span>will show some backbone and "release a hearing designation order (HDO) that says the wireless merger would not serve the public interest and would result in a "massive loss of <span class="caps"><span class="caps">U.S. </span></span>jobs and investment.""</p>
<p>In other news, <span class="caps"><span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span></span>was trying to save the T-Mobile merger by selling customers and spectrum to Leap Wireless, according to the NY Times, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-25/at-t-said-to-plan-proposing-bigger-asset-sales-to-save-t-mobile-takeover.html" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a> and <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/28/2595131/at-t-trying-to-save-t-mobile-merger-by-selling-customers-and-spectrum" target="_blank">the Verge</a>. If <span class="caps">AT&amp;T </span>gave up 40% of T-Mobile, why would they bother acquiring it to begin with? Oh, wait, to take a competitor off the table. I forgot.</p><p>Either way T-Mobile is toast -- and Sprint isn't getting any better after this battle.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Some Have Reached The Peak</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2011/10/some-have-reached-the-peak.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2011:/on-rads-radar//51.47739</id>

    <published>2011-10-21T13:49:29Z</published>
    <updated>2011-10-21T14:46:12Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I had a conversation yesterday with a friend from UHC. She mentioned that VISA is worried about its profitability on just the&nbsp;$0.24 federal max&nbsp;per debit card transaction. Here's the problem the American economy faces: We Peaked Already.&nbsp; Period.Globally, America is...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="jobs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="telco" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="wireline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="economy" label="economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rant" label="rant" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="wireline" label="wireline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[I had a conversation yesterday with a friend from UHC. She mentioned that VISA is worried about its profitability on just <a href="http://consumerist.com/2011/09/visa-and-mastercard-planning-to-hike-debit-card-fees-on-small-items-for-merchants.html" target="_blank">the&nbsp;$0.24 federal max&nbsp;per debit card transaction</a>. Here's the problem the American economy faces: We Peaked Already.&nbsp; Period.<br /><br />Globally, America is in a battle for good jobs, natural resources, oil, and soon clean water. (Georgia and Tennessee are already battling over water rights.) This planet can not sustain 7 billion people, which will be the population this weekend.<br /><br />The US is a service based economy, the engine of which is consumer spending. As more folks are unemployed and as debt increases, that leaves less discretionary income to spend in the economy. Hence, the economy dries up. We are seeing this now.<br /><br />VISA and Mastercard had their heyday, enjoying profits as Americans spent, spent, spent their way into <a href="http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/credit-card-industry-facts-personal-debt-statistics-1276.php" target="_blank">average household debt of $15k</a>. Did either company do anything to educate their customers about debt, spending or personal finance? Hell no. There's only one thing left to these companies: a spiral down in revenue and profitability.<br /><br />Banks hit their peak too. They made all their money on re-financing and mortgage. No brakes on that speeding train either. Now the it all comes home to roost. Banks make money lending. It's very challenging to get a small business loan, a mortgage or a car loan - all of which keeps the economy buzzing. How will the economy turn and the bank make money without loans?<br /><br />Another industry that has peaked is health insurance. (Auto insurance might be in the same boat). I think we have seen the height of employment. And without employment, there's less people with health insurance. Couple that with Boomers migrating to Medicare and health insurance companies are set to make less revenue going forward.<br /><br />From personal experience, solopreneurs and freelancers have a tough time finding insurance. I didn't say affordable, I said insurance. They don't want to cover anything. It's peaked. <br /><br />And lastly, ILEC's, especially the RLEC's. They have seen their golden years; it's all rust going forward. The RLEC's want to continue to do business as they have before: funded by USF. It's broken. As rural LEC customers go cell only or switch to Vonage or cable, the house of cards tumbles. <br /><br />The ripple effect of the Broadband Stimulus will be a tightening of RUS loans. NFBA and Open Range are probably just the beginning of a string of failures and investigations. This will have far reaching effects.<br /><br />The ILECs are used to having all the customers in their region. Now they have to split with cable. ILEC's had the most profitable service - voice on plant that was paid for and cheaply maintained. Even when they had to share that copper plant, they still made money, but alas greed. DSL was also highly profitable and didn't require too much construction. But moving to TV has proven to be a challenge. Fiber, head-ends, content distribution rights, set top boxes, ONT's, et al - meant that the ILEC's had to spend big money to make little profit (if at all. See <a href="http://blog.oregonlive.com/siliconforest/2011/05/frontier_ceo_confirms_we_want.html" target="_blank">Frontier FiOS TV fiasco</a>). And now we are seeing OTT video and cable cutting due to the economy and consumer dissatisfaction with the content empire.<br /><br />ILEC's like Windstream, TDS and CenturyLink have made cloud and CLEC acquisitions to chase new revenue while the consumer wireline business decreases. Fairpoint and Frontier still have to figure out their next move. VZ and ATT have a booming cellular business (that has almost peaked for them too).<br /><br />Sorry for the doom and gloom. This was just some thoughts that I needed to write down. I'm not saying I am 100% right, but it makes sense to me.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A Little Merger Opposition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/2011/08/a-little-merger-opposition.html" />
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2011:/on-rads-radar//51.47387</id>

    <published>2011-08-31T13:37:27Z</published>
    <updated>2011-08-31T16:48:23Z</updated>

    <summary> Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) held a news conference to oppose the AT&amp;T/T-Mobile merger. According to this report, &quot;At the news conference, Conyers said, &quot;I&apos;ve never seen a merger that didn&apos;t lose jobs.&quot; .... At...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri>http://rad-info.net/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="cellular" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="att" label="att" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cellular" label="cellular" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="congress" label="congress" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mergers" label="mergers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/">
        <![CDATA[<img class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" src="http://blog.tmcnet.com/on-rads-radar/ATTBuysTMobile.jpg" alt="ATTBuysTMobile.jpg" width="184" height="138" />
<p>Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) held a news conference to oppose the <span class="caps">AT&T</span>/T-Mobile merger. According to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbtaylor/5769953308/">this report</a>, "At the news conference, Conyers said, "<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/163303-conyers-markey-fight-atat-merger">I've never seen a merger that didn't lose jobs</a>." .... At the hearing the next day, Conyers went further, stating, "I have never met a merger that I liked. They always cost jobs, and they create less competition, and they hurt consumers.""</p>
<p><span class="caps">UPDATE</span>!!!!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/doj-says-no-ma-cell-what-happens-next">Harold Feld writes</a>: "In what is undoubtedly the best Labor Day present the Department of Justice ever gave America, DOJ <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2011/274615.htm">has filed to block the AT&T/T-Mobile Merger</a> in court. One should not, however, expect AT&T to give up easily. AT&T can, and almost certainly will, decide to fight rather than simply abandon the deal. If nothing else, it has $6 billion in break up fees to pay if the merger does not go through. On the plus side, the odds definitely favor the DoJ, which is why so many companies simply abandon the merger once DoJ has filed."</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

