USF and Net Neutrality

Today is supposed to be just on policy but my heart skipped a beat when I saw an infrared temperature gun at the office. Now what foodie isn't dying to know how hot the burners get or at what temperature the grill is cooking those steaks. However, in the sternest of words I was told, "Do not take this home."  Okay what I heard was "Not today". On to policy...

As a VP at Broadvox, my top concerns with regard to telecom policy are the USF Reform and Net Neutrality. The first, on the surface appears to involve players other than Broadvox. The Universal Service Fund is intended to give rural America equal footing with regard to telecommunications services and prices. However, the USF has been growing at a rate far beyond expectations and the distribution of funds has come under scrutiny. It is therefore assumed and expected that a change in funding and spending policy is needed. Most of the reform will affect wireline and wireless carriers but there could be over reach in the new policies that may influence Internet Service Providers. I'm paying close attention to the decision expected on December 18th.

Net Neutrality is a more obvious policy concern for companies like Broadvox, an ITSP. Today we deliver the same quality of service to our wholesales customers and business customers. The loss of net neutrality would force us and many others to review our business strategies in order to compete in an environment where quality, speed and access become service attributes. The loss of net neutrality will redefine the offerings of many players in this industry. In general, the consumer may be the most affected.

Therefore, what is the new administration's view of these two concerns? On the surface, the pending Obama administration supports USF reform to maintain rural competition, improve services such as wireless and deliver more broadband to rural areas. Moreover, the support for net neutrality seems to be uncompromising. For observers like me, the devil will be in the details.

More on Friday...

The opinions and views expressed in comments, blogs, etc. are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of TMC, TMCnet, or its editors. TMCnet reserves the right to edit, delete, or otherwise make changes to the content that appears on these pages at its own discretion and as it deems necessary.
| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to sites that reference USF and Net Neutrality:

USF and Net Neutrality TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/38063

Around TMCnet:

Leave a comment

Recent Comments

  • MeatHub Inc.: Gotta say this apple salsa sound really tasty! Might have read more
  • jhnsmth631: Hi, I appreciate your constant update on the telecom trends. read more
  • pathsolutions.wordpress.com: The problem with MOS is that it is only a read more
  • Lorna Lyle: David, all that smoked food sounds tantalizingly delicious! Your co-workers read more
  • Tsahi Levent-Levi: David, Thanks for the great explanation on HD Voice. I'll read more
  • https://me.yahoo.com/a/gvzcL54lk8iXFtXA58UGYfb2KCuj8DT2PbGP#51e31: In addition SIP support, the Polycom VVX 1500 supports standard read more
  • http://openid.aol.com/gdgman52: what if your teen age kid absolutely refuses to let read more
  • https://me.yahoo.com/a/0Q_5NVUUq5rO_tnDPcVGdZc5bNQllMmzmvs-#388c7: David: As a new follower of your weekly blogs, I read more
  • https://me.yahoo.com/a/qiFN2K8thIEo.r.s3EgcCurY47Y-#3dad6: I never thought I would see Oklahoma and Eurocentric in read more

Subscribe to Blog

Blogroll

Recent Entry Images

Around TMCnet Blogs

Latest Whitepapers

TMCnet Videos