Does Unified Communications Defy Definition? Huh?

For some time it has been popular to rant about the lack of a definition for the growing Unified Communication space. In fact, so much so that it has almost become cliché to say “there is no cohesive Unified Communications definitions.” Well, I’m not going to say it any more…. At least without providing concrete reasons for why I this is the case.

To read more about why check out this TMCnet article.

Quick summation: Part of the problem is that some obvious prerequisites for the UC vision have not been met from an open, standards perspective, i.e., “federated presence” across enterprise and service provider networks. The other part of the problem that scaresIP management is how to start a UC migration selectively, yet be “future-proofed” for the new capabilities that UC might offer, especially in a mobile, device independent world.

The opinions and views expressed in comments, blogs, etc. are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of TMC, TMCnet, or its editors. TMCnet reserves the right to edit, delete, or otherwise make changes to the content that appears on these pages at its own discretion and as it deems necessary.
| 1 Comment | 0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to sites that reference Does Unified Communications Defy Definition? Huh?:

Does Unified Communications Defy Definition? Huh? TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/35353

1 Comment

Hype and lack of UC definitions have been a pet peeve of mine for a while. I have defined UC as:

An evolving communications technology architecture which automates and unifies all forms of human and device communications in context, and with a common experience. Its purpose is to optimize business processes and enhance human communications by reducing latency, managing flows, and eliminating device and media dependencies.

I entered this definition in Wikipedia and so far it has stuck.

Some may find it inadequate since it doesn't mention IP, VoIP, IP Telephony, Unified Messaging, Presence, SOAP, XML, etc, etc. In my view, all of these are components and enablers which may, or may not, be part of a UC solution.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Tim Gray published on March 3, 2008 3:20 PM.

Polycom's Schooling the Global Unified Communications Space was the previous entry in this blog.

Leveraging the IMM Platform is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Around TMCnet Blogs

Latest Whitepapers

TMCnet Videos