Recently in cellular Category

As if ordering delivery take-out food wasn’t already easy enough, USA Today recently reported that soon it may no longer be necessary to even talk to another person on the phone to put in your order. That’s because text ordering is being adopted by more and more national fast-food and other restaurant chains, allowing users to send their requests for sustenance via a cell phone.
 
Among the chains now offering or looking into offering text ordering: Papa John’s (national TV spots now promote the service), Domino’s (launched last July), Pizza Hut (soon to get started), Quiznos (considering), Dunkin’ Donuts (considering), Subway (considering), McDonald’s (testing in Seoul), and Starbucks (trial underway in London and in one U.S. store).
 
The USA Today report quoted Papa John’s CEO Nigel Travis as saying that the potential of texting can be compared to online ordering, which currently accounts for 20 percent of the company’s sales. (He went on to predict that, within two years, texting will account for 3 percent of sales.)
 
Americans send about 30 billion text messages each month, USA Today noted. GoMoboo.com CEO Noah Glass was quoted in the report as predicting that texting very well might account for 25 percent of all takeout food orders by the time another decade is gone.
 
Not everyone is thrilled about using cell phones to text in takeout orders, though; some users are concerned about privacy. For example, one user quoted in the USA Today report said he guards his cell phone number carefully, describing it as “the last firewall of privacy.” Giving it to a national restaurant chain in the process of placing an order could be in invitation to unwanted calls, he implied.
 
What do you think—do the benefits of text ordering outweigh the potential privacy breaches?
The other day, a rep from Tiny Pictures, which makes software solutions for mobile devices, got in touch to tell me about Radar. She explained that Radar is a free service that lets mobile phone users share camera phone pictures, videos and attached comments with friends and family. She described the service as a “real time conversation—letting you show the funny, nutty, interesting things that happen to you.”
 
The capabilities of Radar include a private “channel” and Web address to protect your privacy, allowing only invited friends to see the content you’ve chosen to share. Friends can then comment, either privately or publicly.
 
Radar reportedly works with most cameraphones (compatible with more than 225 devices) including iPhone, BlackBerry and smartphones running Windows Mobile.
 
Seems like a cool idea. If you try Radar, let me know how you like it.
Yours truly braved the crowds this year to attend the New Year’s celebrations in Times Square. It was a long day—my companions and I arrived in the city about 11:30, and were in position with a great view of the ball by about 2:00. It was a long wait; you try standing in the same place for ten hours and you’ll understand why everyone was cheering at midnight: the ordeal was over, we could all go home.
 
One of the things that kept the crowd on my side of the street (we were next to the MTV building) entertained was an MTV-sponsored giant screen on which were displayed text messages from people standing on the street. Mobile phone users simply typed in a special code, and whatever username they wanted displayed, then their message. A few minutes later—voila! There it was for thousands of people to read.
 
Here’s a wideshot of the screen, with surrounding buildings and the crowd across the street from where I was standing, contained by concrete barriers.
 
 
The text message screen became a way for strangers in a massive crowd to converse with each other. The messages, some in response to MTV-planted questions, included your standard debates about which was the best sports team, what people resolved to do in 2008, how tired people were of standing there, and way too many instances of “Welcome to the party.”
 
Here’s a sampling of the messages.
 
 
In my opinion, the text screen was a brilliant idea that gave an otherwise restless crowd something to do for long stretches of time.
 
Were you in Times Square on New Year’s Eve? Happy New Year!
With the Macworld Conference & Expo only a few weeks off, yours truly thought it might be a good time to head on over to AppleInsider and see what’s on tap for current Apple-related gossip. It’s kind of funny how much fuss was made last year leading up to Macworld 2007, mostly speculation about iPhone, and how relatively quiet the rumor mill is this year.
 
One very likely announcement from Apple at Macworld might be a deal with 20th Century Fox to rent movies on-demand through iTunes. AppleInsider reports that such a deal is in the works, according to a recent Financial Times article quoting “a person familiar with the situation.” Sounds like a credible source to me!
 
The service would supposedly work like this: users could download a complete movie from iTunes, for a rental fee, but it would only last a set amount of time before “expiring.” Fox would also provide DVD copies of the movies that are copy protected to an extent; these copies would allow the movies to be transferred to a device (e.g. iPod, iPhone) for viewing.
 
Who knows, AppleInsider said—it’s possible not only Fox but other studios as well may be on hand at Macworld to announce similar deals.
 
Of course, all of this is speculation since none of the parties mentioned here—Apple, Fox, other studios—have confirmed that such deals are even in the works.
 
Another possible announcement at Macworld might be exclusive iPhone distribution deals between Apple and mobile service providers in China and Japan. (China Mobile? DoCoMo?) Also, Apple probably will say something about releasing a 3G-enabled iPhone in 2008 (AT&T’s CEO let this slip in November.)
 
It remains to be seen what effect any such announcements would have on Apple’s continued business success. The company is pretty highly valued, if stock prices are any indication; on Wednesday shares of the company topped $200 for the first time, closing at $198.95. Would you pay $200 for a share of Apple?
One of the biggest stories of this Friday-before-Christmas was a report that Apple and Nicholas Ciarelli, master of the Think Secret Apple rumors Web site, have reached an amicable agreement in which Ciarelli agreed to shut down the site. The site was a source for leaks about Apple product releases, but because it was run by an independent publisher it ultimately was put in a different category than traditional journalistic outlets.
 
Apple sued Ciarelli in January, 2005, for publishing trade secrets from the company, and now almost three years later the heart of the matter has finally been sorted out. New York Times reported that Ciarelli, a senior at Harvard, was satisfied with the outcome.
 
This is a victory for Apple that goes against two precedents—cases in which courts ruled the company could not stop journalists from exercising First Amendment rights to publish information.
 
No specifics about the settlement were released. Whether you view it as a victory for the cause of business to protect trade secrets or a loss for protection of information dissemination/the public debate depends on your perspective. What do you think?
When it comes to smartphone market share, no-one can touch Nokia. But it looks like Research in Motion (RIM), maker of BlackBerry devices, will come pretty close for 2007. That’s the conclusion reached by ABI Research in its research brief, Research in Motion Strategic Review, released Thursday.
 
ABI is predicting that RIM will end 2007 with 10 percent of the smartphone market, making it the second largest such vendor in terms of device shipments—second only to Nokia. RIM’s market share, ABI reported, has risen steadily during the past five quarters (from 7.2 percent in the third quarter of 2006 to 9.5 percent in the third quarter of 2007).
 
So how can RIM capitalize on its current winning streak?
 
“In addition to operator partnerships, RIM needs to grow both its R&D and manufacturing capabilities to expand and increase its presence in markets beyond North America and Europe,” advised ABI analyst Shailendra Pandey, in the research brief. “Considering the growing opportunities in the Asia Pacific region, a manufacturing and R&D presence in India or China can help RIM in shipping more devices and reducing overall costs.”
 
ABI also noted that one of RIM’s strengths is a consistently high and stable average selling price (ASP) for its devices. For 2007, ABI estimates that RIM’s ASP for smartphones is $345, significantly higher than the overall industry average of $248. This demonstrates that, if the feature set is right and the device is well-executed, consumers and carriers are willing to support higher prices.
 
What do you think—will RIM catch up with Nokia during 2008?
The envelope, please. RCR Wireless reports today that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission has released a full list of companies that applied to participate in the 700 MHz wireless spectrum auction due to begin January 24, 2008. The FCC reportedly received 266 applications—from big companies like Google and small, regional phone companies like Inland Cellular Telephony Company serving Eastern Washington State and North Central Idaho.
 
RCR Wireless reports that the FCC has assigned an “Accepted” status to 96 applicants, with a further 80 applicants given an initial filing status of “Incomplete.” On the incomplete list are Alltel, Cox Wireless and Qualcomm. Google is represented on the accepted list under Google Airwaves, Inc., and Microsoft under Vulcan Spectrum LLC.
 
The RCR Wireless report noted that 62 megahertz are up for grabs in the auction, divided into 1,099 wireless licenses of various sizes. Google and Microsoft are among those companies vying for the open access 22MHz “C” block. Altogether, the FCC is reportedly expecting to bring in $15 billion from the auction.
 
Among the bidders in the auction are AT&T Mobility, Verizon Wireless, Alltel, Leap Wireless and MetroPCS. Cable TV and broadcasting bidders include Bright House Networks, Cox, Cablevision, EchoStar, Public Broadcasting Service and Catholic Church Brooklyn (under the name Trans Video Communications, Inc.). Notably absent from the list are T-Mobile and Sprint Nextel.
 
Those companies whose applications were dubbed incomplete have until January 4 to resubmit with corrections.
Legal-wise, this week has been a mixed bag so far for Apple and its iPhone. The “good” news first: on Tuesday, TMCnet contributing editor Susan Campbell reported that T-Mobile won a case in Germany involving the sale of Apple’s iPhone. A German court reversed an injunction against the carrier that would have required it to sell an unlocked version of iPhone.
 
Now, T-Mobile is free to remain the exclusive provider of iPhone in Germany, offering it only as a locked device with a two-year contract. iPhone is locked with a SIM card that prevents users from using the device with any other operator’s network.
 
Campbell reported that the injunction was brought by T-Mobile competitor Vodafone.
 
In response to its win, T-Mobile turned around and announced that it will offer an unlocked, contract-free iPhone for $1,481, quite a price hike compared with the locked device that sells for $581.85.
 
In her report, Campbell noted that Apple, too, must be breathing a sigh of relief over the ruling. That’s because the company “offers specific partners exclusive iPhone selling rights in exchange for a percentage of the monthly subscription rights. It has been estimated that Apple enjoys as much as 10 percent of the proceeds.”
 
So far Apple is sticking to its exclusive partner strategy as it makes iPhone available in different parts of the world. In the U.S., iPhone is available only through AT&T. In Britain, the carrier is O2, in Germany it’s T-Mobile (division of Deutsche Telekom) and in France it’s Orange (an arm of France Telecom).
 
Okay, so for Apple that’s the good news. The bad news is that when one lawsuit is satisfactorily resolved, another one pops up. Next in line: a suit (filed in Federal Court, Eastern District of Texas by law firm Dovel & Luner) brought by Klausner Technologies, claiming Apple and AT&T are violating its visual voicemail patents.
 
In question are U.S. Patents 5,572,576 and 5,283,818. These involve “visual voicemail” features that allow users to selectively retrieve voicemail messages using visual, onscreen navigation. TMCnet editor Patrick Barnard reported that Klausner's technology has been licensed by companies like Time Warner AOL and Vonage to enable their visual voicemail systems.
 
Klausner said it has successfully litigated against infringers of the involved patents on two occasions, and intends to do the same with Apple and AT&T. Klausner seeks damages and future royalties (estimated at $360 million) from both companies.
 
It appears that Klausner is currently on a suing spree. Barnard reported that, also this week, the company filed suits against eBay’s Skype unit, Comcast and Cablevision. A couple months ago, Klausner also settled a suit out-of-court that it brought against Vonage.
In a move that left consumers and wireless industry analysts gasping with surprise, Verizon Wireless let the world know Monday night that it has changed its mind about Google’s mobile Android platform. That’s right, the carrier that never stops working for you has admitted maybe it was wrong about Android and open standards, and would now like to be part of the future, thank you very much.
 
Sensing a bit of snarkiness in the paragraph above? Yep, that’s right. It seems to me that, given Verizon Wireless’ announcement last week that it plans to open its network to outside developers and manufacturers next year, the announcement about Android is hardly that surprising.
 
The story about Android was apparently broken by BusinessWeek, in a report quoting Verizon Wireless CEO Lowell McAdam as explaining that the Android announcement culminates a year’s worth of evolution in the company’s strategy. The company’s new outlook on life was borne out of many meetings with FCC officials and executives at co-parent Verizon Communication (Vodafone also owns a stake).
 
Why the change of heart? Apparently Verizon Wireless, despite being so successful, sees the writing on the wall: the future of mobile and wireless lies with open standards and open networks, not proprietary practices. Things might be rosy now for the company, but it seems to think that might change if it doesn’t get on board with the trends of the future.
 
Smart move, in my opinion. By deciding to open its network, and by embracing Android, Verizon Wireless may well be known as the carrier that helped lead the way to a more open wireless market in the U.S.
 
What do you think—is Verizon Wireless being smart or just bowing to industry pressures?
In late September, TMCnet editor Stefania Viscusi reported on the possibility that Walt Disney Internet Group, after announcing the shutdown of its Disney Mobile phone service on Sept. 27, might be out of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) business for good.
 
The answer to that question is “Apparently not,” at least not for now. Wall Street Journal reported today that Walt Disney Co. and Softbank Corp. (a Japanese mobile operator) are teaming up to introduce a mobile phone service in Japan. The service will be called… drum-roll please… Disney Mobile.
 
Apparently the company is hoping that the Japanese market ends up being more lucrative than the U.S. Disney plans to use Softbank’s networks and sell phones at thousands of Softbank stores in Japan.
 
The U.S.-based Disney Mobile service was launched in April 2006 and lasted just about a year and a half before folding. (Existing customers will continue receiving support until Dec. 31, 2007; Verizon has stepped up to the plate with a special Chaperone Service deal for subscribers who want to transfer up to five phone numbers to another provider.) The service was geared toward families, providing kids with limited access to the Internet on phones configured to help parents track the whereabouts of their children.
 
The Disney Mobile service in Japan is slated for a spring, 2008 launch. No further details of the deal between Disney and Softbank were released.
 
When Disney announced the shutdown of its American MVNO operations, Walt Disney Internet Group president Steve Wadsworth said the company decided the wireless operator market in the U.S. was too competitive, and that more profitable opportunities for its content and services existed through other business models.
 
Only time will tell whether the sun will rise on Disney’s service in Japan for longer than it did in the U.S.
 
What do you think—is Japan a better market or is Disney making another mistake?
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next

Subscribe to Blog

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the cellular category.

Bluetooth is the previous category.

fixed-mobile convergence is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Blogroll

Recent Comments

  • sex shop: he MS fanboys need to step back and realise that read more
  • Georg: Fantastic or Foolhardy - or both at the same time? read more
  • Mirko: As you already mentioned: some methods are more practical than read more
  • Anniversary gift: Based on your article, it seems that the only significant read more
  • oil portraits: I also noticed the same trend here in our place. read more
  • G. Aasen: Interesting indeed. Let's hope they are more successful in Japan read more
  • Bahamut: If earthlink is going into difficulty, it will certainly affect read more
  • Free Flash Clock: Earthlink restructuring will definitely affect the wifi market. But wifi read more
  • Polin Armsley: niceSecond, the amount Li is suing Apple for seems rather read more
  • www.r10.net küresel seo yarismasi: obviously still no iPhone nano around, but plenty of iPods. read more