Recently in mobility Category

I spent Thursday in the Big Apple at Nasdaq Studios, observing the festivities as Synchronoss Technologies—the company whose software is used by AT&T to handle behind-the-scenes nitty-gritty associated with activating an iPhone—celebrated its first anniversary as a public company. Synchronoss officials were also in a jovial mood over the company's recently signed multi-year deal with AT&T to provide ongoing operational support of the Apple iPhone and its Monday unveiling of a similar deal with broadband Internet service provider Clearwire.
 
The day dawned a misty, muggy one; waiting for my Metro North train into the city from Westchester, I observed to myself that while it wasn't raining the air was nonetheless positively wet. It was also a day when some people's commutes were disrupted somewhat; as we rolled into Grand Central Terminal, a conductor announced over the PA system that some subways might not be running. This was due to the Wednesday steam pipe explosion about a block from Grand Central that left what someone later described to me as "a crator." Heading further underground to catch the 7 train to Times Square, I asked a police officer what the deal was and he told me that all trains were running but some exits were blocked.
 
I arrived at Nasdaq studios at 11:00, and met for about 20 minutes with Stephen Waldis, CEO of Synchronoss. (Full interview coming soon.) iPhone, of course, was among the topics we discussed. I asked him about the difficulties some people had activating their iPhones, and he observed that according to Reuters less than two percent of customers had this difficulty—a pretty impressive number considering the size of the launch. He also noted that "difficulty" in this case meant the customer wasn't able to activate in the roughly five minutes promised, which in and of itself is a very short amount of time.
 
Over lunch, which started at 11:30, I sat with a lively group of people including Omar Tellez (EVP of Marketing at Synchronoss), Paul Banco from market opinion firm SeekingAlpha, and Andy Cox (CIO at Synchronoss). We talked a lot about the future of wireless, including ways to improve mobile device battery life and the possibility that perhaps one day satellites will be used to blanket the planet with not just in on-demand radio but voice and data services too.
 
After lunch, Waldis gave a relatively brief speech in which he outlined the trends he sees in the triple play market. He concluded that what's ensuing now is a battle for the digital home—a battle that is really heating up because consumers are ready to spend money on converged services. He estimated that many households are willing to spend a total of $157 or more on various digital services for both practical and pleasurable purposes.
 
What consumers want, Waldis said, is to be able to access any content, on any device, using any network, via any application, at any time. The challenge for providers is to figure out how to meet this demand. Providers are challenged by network fragmentation, back-office disparate systems, manual staff, and device/content proliferation. All of these factors result in high defect rates, high costs, and lost revenue.
 
Nor surprisingly given the solutions his company offers, Waldis said the solution to these solutions is bringing separate silos together with a single platform. Such a platform will drive success by enabling fast, reliable networks and easy-to-use services. A single platform also offers the advantages of consistency, scalability/configurability and cost-effectiveness.
 
Waldis' presentation was followed by a panel discussion. The panelists were from three of Synchronoss' biggest clients: Catherine Avgiris representing Comcast, Joseph Varello representing Cablevision and Richard Digeronimo representing Level 3. Mark Winther from IDC moderated.
Panel Discussion, Synchronoss First Birthday Event
 
The panel topics largely centered around a prediction that, by 2010, 40 percent of U.S. households will subscribe to triple play services—and how providers are working to make that vision a reality. The panelists had similar but somewhat differing viewpoints. For example, on the issue of how to maintain sustainable triple play businesses by cutting costs in the back office, Digeronimo from Level 3 emphasized the need for automation; Avgiris from Comcast focused on the manta 'Don't automate, obliterate,' which refers to simplifying processes by removing unnecessary steps and automating the necessary ones; and Varello said the key is to view cost-cutting as an ongoing experience in which the provider must learn from past experience.
 
The discussion was followed by a Q and A with the panelists, and then a Q and A with Synchronoss execs. This wrapped up the main activities, but I hung around with some other folks for about an hour to view the Nasdaq closing ceremony at 4:00 in which Waldis rung the bell. While waiting, I enjoyed a nice cheese and fruit spread, and chatted for a while with Joe Mindo, account executive at Springboard, the firm that handles PR for Synchronoss. We commiserated about the frustrations of NYC metro area traffic and the terrific view of Times Square from second floor of the Nasdaq studios, among other smalltalk chit-chat.
View from Nasdaq Studios
 
While waiting, I observed highlights from the day's financial transactions. eBay was down -1.5 percent, Cisco up +1.8 percent, Google down -0.1 percent and Clearwire up +34 percent.
 
Just before the closing bell ceremony, it began pouring rain outside—a brief shower that was over by the time I left the building about 4:30. It seemed a good metaphor for the topics of the day's events: in the technology industry, there may be rough financial times, but things always bounce back one way or another.
iPhone is still in its infancy (not even a month old yet), and already rumors are flying that it could soon have a younger sibling. A Reuters report on Monday said that Taiwan-based JP Morgan analyst Kevin Chung has connections in the supply channel who claim an iPhone based on the iPod Nano is already in the works.
 
Chung apparently issued a report on July 8 in which he cited both his supply channel contacts, and a patent application filed July 5 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, as evidence that the iPhone Nano is in utero.
 
According to Chung, Apple plans to convert the iPod Nano into an iPhone because “it’s probably the only way to launch a lower end phone without severely cannibalizing iPod Nano,” the Reuters report quoted him as saying.
 
Chung predicts the iPhone Nano will sell for $300 or less and, perhaps predictably, have “rather limited functionality.”
 
This claim of Chung’s is backed up, Reuters said, by another analyst—Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray. Jaffray reportedly predicted that Apple plans to release iPhone-like iPods later this year.
 
Hmm… so the idea is to market the lower-end products as “iPods with a phone” rather than “a phone with an iPod.” Is this a distinction that people will care about? I’m not so sure. If people want a music player, and are willing to shell out more bucks for both added functionality and coolness, they’ll buy an iPod. If they want a phone and an iPod, maybe they’ll buy an iPhone instead.
 
Does any of this surprise me? No, not really. Of course Apple will, at some point, release a lower-end model. The company is not stupid; it knows, just like the food company that supplies essentially the same cereal in two different boxes, one ‘store-brand’ and one ‘brand-name,’ that it can sell more units if it offers different levels of functionality at different price-points.
 
Look at Apple’s iPod line and you’ll get a pretty good sense of how iPhone’s different models will probably look. You’ll have the basic phone that only makes calls and plays music. Then you’ll have higher-end models with different amounts of storage space that do all the cool things the $600 iPhone does now.
 
The only question in my mind is how long it will be before Apple brings the younger iPhone siblings to gestation. Later this year? Sometime in 2008? I can’t see it happening before the holiday season, which actually would be a great time to roll out a new product, don’t you think?
If you’re like me—someone who’s used to the speed and ease of email—faxing documents can seem like an unbearable hassle. Create document. Print document. Look up phone number. Walk to fax machine. Feed paper into fax machine, dial number. Listen to chirpy tones. Wait for fax to send. Wait for confirmation to print.
 
The situation often isn’t much better on the receiving end. In that case, I have to make sure the fax machine is on, the phone line is free, paper and toner are topped off. Then, I have to make sure I’m present when fax comes in, or risk having to go hunting around the office to see if someone accidentally picked up the fax I was expecting.
 
Surely there must be a better way. Turns out, actually, that there is: faxing has now gone online. I recently when I had a chance to try out RingCentral Fax that online fax is lot more like email and a lot less like fax, than you might expect (although Web-based fax services do, of course, send to and receive from traditional fax machines).
 
I also found out that, compared to the price of maintaining and using a traditional fax machine, online fax is actually very affordable. How affordable? For RingCentral Fax, an annual service plan is available for $49.99 per month, which gives you 2,500 ‘free’ pages (that comes out to 1.9 cents per page; it’s 3.9 cents per page thereafter). You also get free fax software for sending and receiving faxes right on your computer, and free transfer of an existing 800 number.
 
That seems like a pretty good deal for a small business, the market RingCentral aims for with its fax service.
 
I gave RingCentral Fax a whirl and found it easy to use, with a familiar, email-like Web interface for sending and receiving faxes (can also send/receive using included desktop software, and send from within Office apps). One feature I definitely appreciated was a choice of 13 different cover page styles (I went with Contempo).
 
I was also really impressed by the fact that you can import contacts to your Web account from a .csv file (in most cases, you can export email client contacts to a .csv file, meaning you could port your entire Outlook address book to RingCentral Fax).
 
It took about five minutes for my test fax to send, be received on the other end, and for confirmation to come back. I really liked the fact that confirmation is automatic, so I didn’t have to stand around waiting for a receipt to print. I got up to get a drink of water, and when I came back I had been notified of fax being sent three ways: email notification, alert in the Call Controller menu, and as an Inbox message in my RingCentral online account. I didn’t have to wonder if the fax was sent; the system let me know.
 
What does all this have to do with mobility, though? Well, although I haven’t had a chance to test it out yet for myself, my contact at RingCentral told me that the service isn’t just intended for use with a desktop computer. It also lets you receive faxes on your PDA or smartphone, and get text alerts on your mobile or PDA when new faxes come in. RingCentral additionally lets you set up a toll free or local fax number, so you can send and receive faxes to and from any computer in the world. That means you don’t have to wait till you get back to the office to fax; you could take care of business right from your laptop.
 
Overall, this being my first experience with online fax, I was duly impressed with RingCentral Fax. You can read my full review of the product here. Give it a whirl for yourself with a free trial: http://www.ringcentral.com/fax.

iPhone, Firsthand

July 5, 2007 9:35 AM | 0 Comments
Yesterday, to celebrate Independence Day, I engaged in a very American activity: shopping. While I was at the mall, I stopped by the Apple Store to check out iPhone firsthand. Yes, I actually got a chance to play around with the new, cool phone that everyone is talking about.
 
Overall, my conclusion is wow—finally a consumer-grade rather than business-focused smartphone. iPhone was pretty comfortable to hold, and I found its features for the most part impressive.
 
At first, I admit I was a bit concerned about the usability of the touch-screen keyboard that pops up whenever you set out to complete a task requiring typing. On my initial attempts I kept pressing the wrong letter because the “keys” are pretty close to one-another.
 
But then my husband, who was fiddling with another of the iPhones on display next to me, suggested that I try holding my finger down on each “key” to get confirmation via the larger letter that pops up above the “key.” (See this video for an example.) If you press and hold down, the letter isn’t typed—that happens once you remove your finger. In fact, if you keep your finger on the screen, you can scroll sideways/up and down until you find the letter you want.
 
With this new method, the touchscreen keyboard suddenly became usable and I excitedly began exploring the Web functions of iPhone. I mapped out a route to my sister’s place in Boston, and noticed as I did so that iPhone is its own sort of GPS tool since you can scroll through point-by-point directions after mapping a trip.
 
I also typed in “Chinese food” and my ZIP code, and quickly found several options. I was duly impressed by how easy it was to select the restaurant I wanted, and simply by tapping the screen initiate a call to that eatery.
 
I was also pretty impressed by iPhone’s Web browsing capabilities. Unlike with traditional smartphones, iPhone actually uses a full version of the Safari browser to load regular Web pages, not being limited to content designed specifically for mobile devices. It’s very easy to shrink or enlarge Web pages using the famous finger pinch. I also appreciated that fact that, when typing in URLs, a special “.com” button appears on the screen as a shortcut to save typing time.
 
I admit, though, that I probably wouldn’t spend a lot of time reading Web pages on the iPhone’s screen; big thought it may be big compared to other smartphone displays, it’s still a lot tinier than a desktop or laptop monitor. For in-depth, text-heavy research, my computer still is a better tool.
 
Playing around with iPhone, I quickly began to understand that a new type of Web is emerging—the mobile Web. This Web is not about surfing and reading pages of text (though you certainly can do that with iPhone) but rather about quickly looking up and then using information convenient at a particular moment or in a particular location. With iPhone, I could find a nearby Chinese restaurant, give a call to check their hours, and then map my way to the eatery. Very cool.
 
I definitely see the potential of iPhone to revolutionize the consumer smartphone industry. The only thing I see standing in the way of a real revolution is connectivity infrastructure; until wireless Internet coverage (preferably WiFi or WiMAX) reaches near 100 percent in the majority of locations, iPhone’s usefulness will be limited. We’re well on our way to such coverage, of course. (Some areas are there already, others have a long way to go.)
 
If you’ve tried out iPhone yourself, let me know what you think.
iPhone isn’t even a week old yet, and already it’s apparent that accessory manufacturers and software developers have been busy for months gearing up for the release of Apple’s cell phone. One example is software company Innovative Solutions, which today announced a software package that helps users transport movies from DVDs to the iPhone.
 
The software, DVD to iPhone, makes it possible to “put full length DVDs, downloaded movies and other video on the iPhone.”
 
DVD to iPhone is a Windows program, for XP/Vista. According to Innovative Solutions, it can handle any DVD source including pre-recorded and recordable DVDs. Also transportable: video file formats including AVI and MPEG.

DVD to iPhone Screenshot

Innovative Solutions also said that the software enables very speedy transfers, “with a 90 minute DVD being transferred in an average 30 minutes.”
 
The software lets users select from a variety of settings for aspect ration, video and sound quality, and language/subtitle options. Output is compressed to 480hx320w, “optimised for the iPhone and ready to be watched.”
 
If you’re among those who snatched up one of the first iPhones, you can try out the software free, www.dvdtoiphone.com. Full version is $34.95 (EUR 29.95) excluding tax.
So, this morning I got curious: how well did iPhone sell over the weekend? I figured I might be able to get an idea by calling some of the larger Apple Stores around the country. I went to http://www.apple.com/retail and grabbed phone numbers for five stores: one each in Los Angeles, CA; Dallas, TX; New York City; Tampa, FL; and Lyndhurst, OH (near Cleveland).
 
Then, bracing for the time-consuming task of navigating phone menu systems, I hit the phone. Since I was calling mid-morning Eastern Time, I started with stores on the East Coast. I got through three of the five numbers before concluding that I wasn’t going to be able to get the info I wanted—at least not if I was honest about being a journalist. (Since I was planning to write an article and needed specific people to quote, I couldn’t just go undercover.)
 
At the Fifth Avenue Apple Store in New York City, I was told that no-one at the store could comment to the media about anything iPhone-related. I was directed to call the a media relations person (the rep I spoke to implied this person knew about the specific store on Fifth Ave). I took the number, and went on my merry way.
 
After leaving a message for the media relations person, I tried my luck at the Apple Store on West Shore Blvd in Tampa, Florida. That store must have been hopping, since I got a busy signal. Next, on to the Legacy Village Apple Store in Lyndhurst, OH. After listening to a few of the menu options, it became apparent to me that all Apple Stores use the same phone system, so I saved time by deciding not to hear all the choices; instead I pressed the number for ‘all other questions.’
 
“We won’t actually be able to comment on that,” the gentleman I reached at the Legacy Village Apple store told me after I identified myself as being from the media. “If you’d like to call our media relations department, you’re more than welcome. I can get you that number.”
 
When I asked the rep if the media relations person was familiar with sales at particular stores, he told me, “We won’t speak about individual sales via stores.”
 
When he gave me the media relations number, it turned out to be for the same woman I’d been referred by the New York City store. So there you have it. Stopped in my tracks. I may have more to report later if the media relations person I left a message for calls me back.
 
I should stress that the two Apple Store reps I spoke with were very friendly, and I know they were just doing their job by throwing up barriers when they learned I was from the press.
 
One final note: if you’re wondering whether or not a particular Apple Store has iPhones available, you can find this information at www.apple.com/retail/iphone after 9:00 p.m. each night (once the store closes, staff determines if iPhones will be available the following day).

Want an iPhone? Get in Line

June 29, 2007 1:05 PM | 1 Comment
In what has to be one of the best-orchestrated marketing schemes in a while, Apple today will start selling its new iPhone, a device which combines the popular iPod MP3 player with smartphone and wireless Web capabilities. Stores open tonight at 6:00 p.m.  Eastern Time in the U.S. (They’ll be closed from 2:00-6:00pm to prepare for the expected onslaught.) If you want an iPhone, better get in line now.
 
Actually, though, some people have already been in line… since Monday. That’s what Associated Press reports today. Apparently, more than 50 people are now camped out in front of the Apple Store in New York City, some of them having been there since the beginning of the week. (People have also been camping out for days next to an Apple Store in San Francisco.)
 
To me, that seems a bit extreme. Five days in the heat and rain, waiting to buy the latest gadget? I guess it take all kinds to make the world. All kinds to produce an excellent amount of anticipation over the new product, too. iPhone is definitely cool, so cool that analysts (and Steve Jobs) predict that the initial stock of available iPhones will sell out by early next week.
 
Of course, in its typical tight-fisted manner, Apple won’t reveal how many iPhones are available for the initial launch, although the company has set a goal of selling 10 million units by 2008.
 
Meanwhile, analysts are having a field day discussing how other smartphone manufactures are preparing to compete with iPhone. Or, it might be more accurate to say how strong they anticipate the competition will be in coming weeks and months; I would hazard a guess that any phone manufacturer worth its salt has already had six months to jump-start their R&D divisions in hopes of hitting the ground running when iPhone starts selling.
 
One of the more intriguing aspects of iPhone, I think, is the touchscreen technology. Touchscreens, it seems to me, have great potential to revolutionize mobile devices. I mean, mice are great for desktop computers, but we’re overdue for the next big thing in interfaces for handheld gadgets. Only time will tell if this observation of mine pans out, though; technology does have a tendency to be adopted in sometimes unpredictable ways.
 
Oh, one final thing: what about yours truly and iPhone—am I getting one? The answer is no, not yet. I’m gonna save up and wait for the second or third generation. But yes, I do think iPhone is very cool and I do plan to play around with one the next time I’m in the neighborhood of an Apple Store. For now, I’m having enough fun with my iPod nano.
Last week I blogged about CallWave’s new Visual Voicemail service for use with mobile phones. I wrote that I really liked the service, but had two gripes:
 
1. Callers didn’t get my personal greeting, instead reached a generic CallWave message.
 
2. I couldn’t access my voicemail from my phone any longer—only using the online, visual mailbox.
 
I heard back from two reps at CallWave (you can read their notes in the comments section of this blog) who pointed out that, actually, the Visual Voicemail service has functionality built in that overcome both the problems I was encountering.
 
First, you can record a personal greeting by dialing your own number from your phone, or by calling a special number provided by CallWave. This takes you into voicemail setup. I was able to record a greeting in a snap.
 
Second, the reason I couldn’t access my voicemail by phone was that I was using a special shortcut on my keypad to dial into the Cingular voicemail system. This was a different route to access messages than dialing my own number; once I did that, I was able to listen to my messages as usual.
 
I did suggest to the CallWave reps that they modify the initial instructions users get to include the details they sent me, and I’m assured this will be done. So, I’m happy to report that CallWave Visual Voicemail does, indeed, do everything I hoped. Try it out yourself and let me know what you think. If you have a smartphone, while you're at it you might want to check out another new CallWave service called Vtxt that sends a text message with the 'gist' of your voicemails in it to your mobile phone.
CallWave, a company that’s been creating voice applications since 1998, recently released a new service called CallWave Visual Voicemail. This is a ‘widget’ (works with iGoogle, Apple OS, Windows, and Yahoo!) that lets you see your voicemail messages in a Web-based menu and choose which ones you want to listen to.
 
I decided to give this a whirl, since I’m still saving up to buy an iPhone (which includes lots of neat features, including visual voicemail). IMHO, visual voicemail is long overdue. I mean, why should I have to skip through to ALL of my mobile voicemail messages just to get to the one I want? That’s so 20th century.
 
Since I already have a Google account, I figured the easiest way for me to use CallWave Visual Voicemail would be on one of my iGoogle tabs. Adding the widget was easy enough; I registered for the service and slapped it up on iGoogle. I also had to enter a special code into my cell phone to enable calls to be forwarded to the CallWave system. (I was also provided with a code to deactivate forwarding.)
 
Then, I tested the service out. It’s pretty cool; once messages come in, you see them right on the screen in a neat little box showing the caller (if there’s caller ID associated with it, or just the number), date of call, and duration.
 
After creating a couple test messages, I figured it was time to see how easy listening to them is. I popped on my headphones and pressed the little red triangle next to one of the messages and voila!
 
There’s also functionality built into the widget that lets you “edit” each message by typing in a description of the caller and choosing which best describes the number:  ‘home,’ ‘work,’ ‘cell’ or ‘unknown.’ Presumably the widget remembers this and lists the appropriate label when someone from that number calls again.
 
I have two minor gripes with the service:
 
1. Voicemail messages are no longer accessible on my phone. I’m using Cingular, so not sure if this is different for other providers. My phone still alerts me to the fact that I have missed calls, but the messages themselves are no longer in the queue when I call into my voicemail.
 
2. Instead of hearing the personal greeting I set up on my phone, callers are greeted to the following message: “Hi, the person you’re calling is using CallWave. Please leave a message after the tone.”
 
Frankly, the second of these glitches is a deal-breaker for me; I want people who call to know they reached my phone. I did send a query to CallWave about this, but haven’t heard back yet. I imagine this problem, and the issue of messages not staying in the phone mailbox, would be easily enough fixed. Maybe this second problem is on the provider end; not sure.
 
Despite my suggestions for how to better the service, I do commend CallWave on taking the bull by the horns and offering something that’s of great use to modern cell phone users.
 
Try it out for yourself and let me know what you think.

Apple iPhone: Coming June 29

June 4, 2007 11:24 AM | 3 Comments
The big news broke over the weekend: there is now an official launch date for Apple’s much-touted iPhone (device that combines mobile phone with iPod). The new product’s hit-the-shelves birthday is June 29.
 
Is it really official? Well, seems so: Reuters is reporting it this morning (citing confirmation from an Apple spokesperson), and Apple aired three TV commercials Sunday night showing off iPhone and saying it will be available to purchase on the 29th. These commercials are available for viewing on Apple’s Web site.
 
In one commercial, the voice-over boasts that there’s never been an iPod that can do so many things: let you use your finger to scroll through music album covers, display video on such a large screen (and change its orientation simply by physically turning the device sideways), let you scroll through and manage photos, and answer a call.
 
The second commercial show how easy it is to turn on iPhone and use it to manage your music, send e-mail, browse the Web, and make a call.
 
My favorite of the commercials is the one titled “Calamari.” In it, a user is watching Pirates of the Caribbean and gets hungry for calamari after seeing the sea monster tails. The user then hops on Google Maps, performs a search for seafood restaurants, locates a place to eat, and then calls the restaurant—all from the iPhone. Pretty slick stuff!
 
So, it’s time to break out your sleeping bags. Something tells me there’s gonna be L-O-N-G long lines outside stores on June 29…
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next

Subscribe to Blog

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the mobility category.

misc is the previous category.

RFID is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Blogroll

Recent Comments

  • sex shop: he MS fanboys need to step back and realise that read more
  • Georg: Fantastic or Foolhardy - or both at the same time? read more
  • Mirko: As you already mentioned: some methods are more practical than read more
  • Anniversary gift: Based on your article, it seems that the only significant read more
  • oil portraits: I also noticed the same trend here in our place. read more
  • G. Aasen: Interesting indeed. Let's hope they are more successful in Japan read more
  • Bahamut: If earthlink is going into difficulty, it will certainly affect read more
  • Free Flash Clock: Earthlink restructuring will definitely affect the wifi market. But wifi read more
  • Polin Armsley: niceSecond, the amount Li is suing Apple for seems rather read more
  • www.r10.net küresel seo yarismasi: obviously still no iPhone nano around, but plenty of iPods. read more