{"id":5177,"date":"2007-01-15T17:12:48","date_gmt":"2007-01-15T17:12:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/e-commerce\/time-inc-layoffs.html"},"modified":"2007-01-15T17:12:48","modified_gmt":"2007-01-15T17:12:48","slug":"time-inc-layoffs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/technology\/time-inc-layoffs.html","title":{"rendered":"Time Inc Layoffs"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\"><img decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"10\" align=\"left\" vspace=\"10\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.justjared.com\/pictures\/2006\/04\/people_magazine_100_most_beautiful\/thumbs\/angelina-jolie-people-magazine-100-most-beautiful00.jpg\" \/>I saw this New York Times (registration required) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/01\/15\/business\/media\/15time.html?pagewanted=2&amp;ei=5070&amp;en=5a7d3d520b5883b8&amp;ex=1169528400&amp;emc=eta1\"><font color=\"#800080\">article<\/font><\/a> today about Time Inc. the publishing division of Time Warner cutting 150 people &ndash; half in editorial jobs. The cuts are surprising as they include editorial talent. This could be considered a very bad sign but in reality the editors have to go because the company is streamlining how it reports on news.<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">Instead of having several correspondents send files to a writer in New York and then having a fact-checking department, the stories will be researched, written and fact checked by one person.<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">Larry Hackett, managing editor of People, said the new reporting model would not preclude putting several correspondents on one piece when the news warrants it.<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">Why is this an interesting development? Because this is what many websites and bloggers do today. So really the web and bloggers have made it impossible for Time Inc. to continue doing business as usual. This is classic media disruption at its best.<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">The question becomes whether Time Magazine will err on the side speed or accuracy. Perhaps this model will allow the best of both worlds.<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">Recently I <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/technology\/a-banner-blogger-day.html\"><font color=\"#800080\">wrote about<\/font><\/a> how bloggers are now being considered by federal courts as journalists. Well here is further reinforcement from the old media world that bloggers are using the formula that makes the most sense today.<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">I should point out there will likely be a loss of quality with this new system Time Inc. is implementing but it has become obvious consumers of content will forgo some quality for more rapid reporting.<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">To me the timing of this news couldn&rsquo;t be anymore amazing as in the post mentioned above I had a paragraph which sums it all up.<\/div>\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<blockquote dir=\"ltr\" style=\"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px\">\n<div style=\"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt\">This past weekend I was at a birthday party and one of my relatives was thanking another relative because he hooked her on the Perez Hilton <a href=\"http:\/\/perezhilton.com\/\"><font color=\"#800080\">blog<\/font><\/a>. She continued &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t need to subscribe to People Magazine anymore.&rdquo; Again, consumers decide what the form of news will be and speed wins.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I saw this New York Times (registration required) article today about Time Inc. the publishing division of Time Warner cutting 150 people &ndash; half in editorial jobs. The cuts are surprising as they include editorial talent. This could be considered a very bad sign but in reality the editors have to go because the company<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[118],"tags":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5177"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5177"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5177\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}