{"id":6315,"date":"2008-01-17T14:25:08","date_gmt":"2008-01-17T14:25:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/e-commerce\/att-and-net-neutrality.html"},"modified":"2008-01-17T14:25:08","modified_gmt":"2008-01-17T14:25:08","slug":"att-and-net-neutrality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/technology\/att-and-net-neutrality.html","title":{"rendered":"AT&#038;T and Net Neutrality"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In case you missed it, Slate has an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2182152\">article <\/a>worth reading titled Has AT&amp;T Lost its mind. It talks about the idea of AT&amp;T filtering web packets via deep packet inspection. I <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/broadband\/att-to-filter-web-traffic.html\">touched <\/a>on this topic as well in the past but Slate goes into more depth if you want a broader perspective. In addition it uses terms like &quot;corporate seppuku&quot; which must make it worth reading. <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/mtstatic\/FCKeditor\/emoticons\/icon_wink.gif\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Excerpt:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The puzzle is how AT&amp;T thinks that its proposal is anything other than  corporate seppuku. First, should these proposals be adopted, my heart goes out  to AT&amp;T&#8217;s customer relations staff. Exactly what counts as copyright  infringement can be a tough question for a Supreme Court justice, let alone  whatever program AT&amp;T writes to detect copyright infringement. Inevitably,  AT&amp;T will block legitimate materials (say, home videos it mistakes for  Hollywood) and let some piracy through. Its filters will also inescapably  degrade network performance. The filter AT&amp;T will really need will be the  one that blocks the giant flood of complaints and termination-of-service notices  coming its way.<\/p>\n<p>But the most serious problems for AT&amp;T may be legal. Since the beginnings  of the phone system, carriers have always wanted to avoid liability for what  happens on their lines, be it a bank robbery or someone&#8217;s divorce. Hence the  grand bargain of common carriage: The Bell company carried all conversations  equally, and in exchange bore no liability for what people used the phone for.  Fair deal.<\/p>\n<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s new strategy reverses that position and exposes it to so much  potential liability that adopting it would arguably violate AT&amp;T&#8217;s fiduciary  duty to its shareholders. Today, in its daily Internet operations, AT&amp;T is  shielded by a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/altlaw.org\/v1\/codes\/us\/587618\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">federal law<\/a> that provides a powerful immunity to copyright  infringement. The Bells know the law well: They wrote and pushed it through  Congress in 1998, collectively spending six years and millions of dollars in  lobbying fees to make sure there would be no liability for &quot;Transitory Digital  Network Communications&quot;&mdash;content AT&amp;T carries over the Internet. And that&#8217;s  why the recording industry sued Napster and Grokster, not AT&amp;T or Verizon,  when the great music wars began in the early 2000s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In case you missed it, Slate has an article worth reading titled Has AT&amp;T Lost its mind. It talks about the idea of AT&amp;T filtering web packets via deep packet inspection. I touched on this topic as well in the past but Slate goes into more depth if you want a broader perspective. In addition<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[171,199,156,118],"tags":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6315"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6315"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6315\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}