{"id":8650,"date":"2010-06-01T16:53:53","date_gmt":"2010-06-01T16:53:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/e-commerce\/facebook_like_button_outage.html"},"modified":"2010-06-01T16:53:53","modified_gmt":"2010-06-01T16:53:53","slug":"facebook-like-button-outage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/facebook\/facebook-like-button-outage.html","title":{"rendered":"Facebook Like Button Outage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#160;<a href=\"http:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/uploads\/facebook-like-button-outage.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"522\" alt=\"facebook-like-button-outage.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/assets_c\/2010\/06\/facebook-like-button-outage-thumb-500x522-7458.jpg\" class=\"mt-image-none\" style=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>How do you know the Facebook Like button is not performing up to spec? How about when Google <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=facebook+like+button&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rlz=1R1GGGL_en___US359\">confirms it<\/a> for you with a glaring &#8220;Page Not Found&#8221; result. Clicking on the link gives you this result in fact. Some reports are <a href=\"http:\/\/mashable.com\/2010\/06\/01\/facebook-like-button-broken\/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader\">saying<\/a> this is a random error &#8211; but it would have to be significant to get Google to update the index in this manner.<\/p>\n<p>I wonder if there is a security hole that hackers have found or just the challenges of rolling out new code and having it work on hundreds of millions millions of pages in such a short amount of time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#160; How do you know the Facebook Like button is not performing up to spec? How about when Google confirms it for you with a glaring &#8220;Page Not Found&#8221; result. Clicking on the link gives you this result in fact. Some reports are saying this is a random error &#8211; but it would have to<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[161,206],"tags":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8650"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8650\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.tmcnet.com\/blog\/rich-tehrani\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}