<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mp3-players-digital-audio/apple-vs-apple-round-3.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2014:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.24810-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Apple vs. Apple: Round 3</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.24810</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mp3-players-digital-audio/apple-vs-apple-round-3.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=24810" title="Apple vs. Apple: Round 3" />
    <published>2006-03-28T20:32:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:19Z</updated>
    <title>Apple vs. Apple: Round 3</title>
    <summary>Like the old Mad Magazine’s Spy vs. Spy, we now have the latest version of Apple vs. Apple.  According to Newsfactor, Apple Computer will meet the Beatles&apos; Apple Corps in court this week in London, where a judge will decide...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Randy Savicky</name>
      <uri>http://www.strategypluscommunications.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="MP3 Players &amp; Digital Audio" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img hspace="7" src="http://www.beatles.com/hub/gfx/articles/68/AppleCorps.JPG" align="left" vspace="7" border="0" /><p>Like the old <strong><em>Mad Magazine’s</em></strong> Spy vs. Spy, we now have the latest version of <strong>Apple</strong> vs. <strong>Apple</strong>.  </p><p>According to <strong><em>Newsfactor,</em></strong> <strong>Apple Computer</strong> will meet the <strong>Beatles' Apple Corps</strong> in court this week in London, where a judge will decide if <strong>iTunes </strong>violates a 1991 agreement between the two companies that supposedly blocked the computer maker from selling music.</p><p>Apple Corps, which represents the Beatles' business interests and markets their post-1968 recordings, wants the computer firm to stop using the &quot;Apple&quot; trademark to sell recordings online and it requests unspecified damages. The maker of <strong>Macintosh</strong> personal computers and iPods says the agreement permits using the Apple name to sell online data transfers, which are what downloaded songs amount to.</p><p>The judge hearing the case, Justice Edward Mann, has admitted to being an <strong>iPod</strong> user (how about that!), but neither side has asked him to recuse himself on account of this.</p><p>For details on the earlier two lawsuits between the companies, dial into <a href="http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=1300046L6SBY"><strong>http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=1300046L6SBY</strong></a>.</p><p /></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
