<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/broadband-tax-proposal.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2014:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.1337-</id>
  <updated>2014-03-29T00:09:06Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Broadband Tax Proposal</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.1337</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/broadband-tax-proposal.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=1337" title="Broadband Tax Proposal" />
    <published>2005-01-31T19:04:34Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:28Z</updated>
    <title>Broadband Tax Proposal</title>
    <summary>Rich Tehrani proposes a broadband tax and then explains why: Broadband Tax: Why I Am For It Rich&apos;s idea is intriguing - have a flat tax on broadband that takes care of everything else. That is to say, this &quot;all...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="VoIP" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Rich Tehrani proposes a broadband tax and then explains why:</p>

<p><a title="Broadband Tax: Why I Am For It" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/rich-tehrani/voip/broadband-tax-why-i-am-for-it.html">Broadband Tax: Why I Am For It</a></p>

<p>Rich's idea is intriguing - have a flat tax on broadband that takes care of everything else.  That is to say, this "all in one tax" means no extra tax on VoIP calls or any other Internet-related taxes now or in the future.</p>

<p>However, anytime I hear someone propose a new tax, as nobel as the idea may seem, I still have to squirm in my chair.  Most people are loathe to think of any new tax, but especially when it comes to something so ubiquitous as the Internet.</p>

<p>The Internet has indeed become like a "utility" - similar to electricity, cable TV, or phone service.  As such, anytime these "regulated" utilities propose a rate hike, (especially electrical rate hikes) inevitably there is an immediate consumer backlash.</p>

<p>I cannot imagine the backlash that would occur should a broadband Net tax be imposed.</p>

<p>There are other factors to consider as well.  What about ISPs, large companies, or other facilities with high-speed T1/T3 data lines?  Do they have to pay a Net tax as well? or do they get a free pass?  And what about dial-up?  Sure, VoIP over dial-up isn't the greatest, but that too bypasses the traditional PSTN with no tax revenue collected by Uncle Sam.</p>

<p>And what about other PSTN bypasses?  Satellite phones, cell phones, etc. What about CB radios or high-powered walkie-talkies? Should we tax these too because they have impacted the tax revenue collected by the government?  </p>

<p>As much as I would like to believe that VoIP has impacted the U.S. government's tax coffers, I believe it has more to do with flat-rate cell phone service with a bucket of minutes than it does VoIP.  Over the past several years people have been paying less in their monthly phone bills (and hence less taxes) because they get a big bucket of cell phone minutes for a low monthly fee.</p>

<p>Anytime the government sticks its hand out looking for a new tax source, I am always a bit wary.  Besides, didn't President George Bush campaign on "simplifying" the tax code this year?</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.1337-comment:17884</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2005:/blog/tom-keating//4.1337" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/broadband-tax-proposal.asp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/broadband-tax-proposal.asp#c17884" />
    <title>Comment from william on 2006-08-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>william</name>
        <uri>http://www.Johnbeckland.com/tax-foreclosures.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.Johnbeckland.com/tax-foreclosures.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>This has never been more true than today as a massive and astonishingly confusing of various tax proposals advertising war between major industry players continues to play itself out on radio, TV, and in newspapers,on an almost daily basis.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-08-09T05:13:11Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
