Dissecting Google Talk with packet sniffer

As I mentioned to James Seng in a comment I posted to his Google Talk post Google Talk isn't using SIP (yet). James confirmed my packet capture analysis of Google Talk with some sniffing of his own, which you can check out in his More About Google Talk blog post. He has some interesting discoveries, including Google appearing to install a STUN server on every Google Talk client to solve the VoIP NAT issues. James writes "In other words, like Skype, Google Talk turns every client into a possible server to help relay voice call between two users." Doesn't this sound eerily like Skype's super nodes that everyone gripes about?

James has echoes my sentiments when he writes, "Very smart thing to do technically speaking but let me go read the Google Talk UAT again. (Hmm...What happen to the 'Don't be Evil' plan?)"

| 4 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Listed below are links to sites that reference Dissecting Google Talk with packet sniffer:

Dissecting Google Talk with packet sniffer TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/13767

Geeks are busy dissecting exactly how Google Talk works by using packet sniffers to take a look at the i/o data. Google announced that Google Talk is Jabber XMPP compliant, but it wasn’t announced what is used to power the voice chat. That is u... Read More

4 Comments

| Reply

It could also be that the STUN server facilitates direct connection between clients so as to reduce the server-side cost of the service.

| Reply

A STUN server is very low overhead and doesn't get used for voice traffic. That's different than using you as a packet relay all the time like Skype does. Way different, orders of magnitude different.

It does appear from the comment (no trace was posted) that the STUN server is used by 3rd parties to help set up calls. It's odd that Google isn't using their own STUN servers; stun isn't a heavy protocol and they certainly have the network/servers for it (though it may be a pain for some reason for them to install on their server farms).

Google would never archive VOIP conversations, convert them to text transcripts, store them forever, and pry further into your life or sell your information or that of your friends.


nooooo, that would never happen.


And nothing of the kind will happen with google IM


What color is your sky?

I have to need some guidline over VoIP dataconversition.

Leave a comment

Recent Activity

Friday

  • Tom Keating posted VoIP in Google ChromeOS
  • Tom Keating tweeted, "VoIP in Google ChromeOS: Google released their ChromeOS operating system yesterday. So naturally, as a VoIP fan I w... http://bit.ly/3T68Ox"

Thursday

More...

Recent Comments

  • precoz: I am wondering, if the VOIP market is still increasing read more
  • Dustin: But that's not the point at all. The majority of read more
  • commangerYEK: Nicely done! read more
  • bstella: How did you get an email address to write to read more
  • Paul: Hi Mike, For Cisco (and normal SIP) passive VoIP recording read more
  • redshirt6: Yes, dying to know if it worked! rs6 read more
  • bruno.clermont: SkypeOut work only if I added their phone number as read more
  • bruno.clermont: I just installed it and try to do some call. read more
  • Kris: Tom, I'm curious. Did you ever get any resolution on read more
  • dsi r4: This is the age of smart phone.Nimbuzz launches it's phone read more

Subscribe to Blog

Recent Entry Images

  • google-chromos-flaphone-voip.jpg
  • startech-conxit-tool.jpg
  • thanksgiving-turkey.jpg
  • verizon-island-of-misfit-toys.jpg
  • mindtouch-cloud.jpg
  • microsoft-windows-20-history.jpg
  • taylor-randall-the-price-is-right.jpg
  • fring-google-android-skype.png
  • gotomeeting-logo.gif

Entry Archives

Around TMCnet Blogs

Latest Whitepapers

TMCnet Videos