CEO Heavyweights Weigh in on House Broadband Bill and net neutrality
Several CEO heavyweights weigh in on the new pending House broadband bill and how it may affect network neutrality with the following letter... We should all call our Congressman and tell them how we feel about this issue - whether you are for or against it. This issue is too important to ignore and I'm afraid mightly lobbying efforts by the broadband providers could affect the competitive landscape of the Internet and give consumers less choice. I guess you know where I stand on this issue. In any event, here's the letter.
The Honorable Joe Barton
Committee on Energy and Commerce
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
We write to express our concern that the telecommunications legislation being considered by the Committee fails to preserve the longstanding openness of the Internet.Without critical changes, the legislation puts at risk consumer choice, American innovation and global competitiveness.
Until FCC decisions made last summer, consumers' ability to choose the content and services they want via their broadband connections was assured by regulatory safeguards.Innovators likewise have been able to use their ingenuity and knowledge of the marketplace to develop new and better online offerings.This "innovation without permission" has fueled phenomenal economic growth, productivity gains, and global leadership for our nation's high tech companies.
To preserve this environment, we urge the Committee to include language that directly addresses broadband network operators' ability to manipulate what consumers will see and do online.It is equally important to pass a bill that fleshes out these consumer freedoms via rules of the road that are both meaningful and readily enforceable.
We look forward to continuing to work with you and other Members of the Committee to protect millions of Americans' legitimate expectations in an open Internet, as well as the innovation and competitiveness that it creates.
Sincerely,
/s/ Jeff Bezos
Founder and CEO
Amazon.com
/s/ Meg Whitman
President and CEO
eBay Inc.
/s/ Eric Schmidt
Chief Executive Officer
Google Inc.
/s/ Barry Diller
Chairman and CEO
IAC/InterActiveCorp
/s/Steve Ballmer
Chief Executive Officer
Microsoft Corp.
/s/ Terry Semel
Chief Executive Officer
Yahoo!
Cc:Members of the Energy & Commerce Committee
Post a comment
- Related Entries
- FCC adopts video franchise rules and overrules states that allow rural phone companies to block VoIP - Mar 05, 2007
- Pure VoIP vs. Telephone and Cable VoIP - Aug 16, 2006
- Congress tells FCC, "We'll Handle e911" - Jun 09, 2006
- Number Portability Redux - Jan 21, 2008
- Comcast Censors some Internet Applications - Oct 22, 2007
- AT&T Delaying Deployment of Competitors' fiber lines? - Jul 11, 2007
- FCC Displeased with U.S. Broadband Deployment Rate - Apr 18, 2007
- VoIP Avoids State Regulation - Mar 21, 2007
- Nothing But Net -- As in Net Neutrality Goes Mobile; Works For Me! - Feb 12, 2007
- Digital Transition? What Digital Transition? - Feb 20, 2007
Technorati
Del.icio.us
Slashdot
Digg
Search Technorati: broadband bill, congress, fcc, net neutrality
Related Tags: broadband, Committee, committee, issue, executive, Executive
Listed below are links to sites that reference CEO Heavyweights Weigh in on House Broadband Bill and net neutrality:
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt3/t.fcgi/25057
Previous blog:
Microsoft Speech Server 2007 previewVoIP & Gadgets Blog Home Page
Next blog:
Microsoft sells 500,000 Windows Mobile PhonesComments to CEO Heavyweights Weigh in on House Broadband Bill and net neutrality
-
pkp646 :
April 12, 2006 2:51 PMI agree with you, no matter how you feel on this issue the case needs to be brought to our Congressmen. What I do disagree about, however, is the need for legislation. In fact I think it is the very "consumer choice, American innovation and global competitiveness" that you want to preserve that I think necessitates government not acting. Regulation prevents competition, lack of competition increases cost, limits options, and destroys innovation. I'm sure you have good reasons for holding the views that you do, but I must disagree with you.
-
sagecast :
May 21, 2006 8:27 AMReaders of this comment thread should know that lessgov and pkp646 look to be part of a tag-team of industry shills who invade blog comments on net neutrality to argue against any government regulation of the Internet. Other names who run with this crowd are Paulaner01, John Rice, AJ Carey and oldhats. (Google any of these names in combination and you'll see how their game works).
By tag-teaming the blogs this small handful of individuals gives the false impression of broad popular support for an industry-friendly position.
What they fail to point out is that Net Neutrality has been the rule that has governed access to the Internet since its inception. It's the reason that the Internet has become such a dynamic force for new ideas, economic innovation and free speech. What they really want is for Congress to radically re-write our telecommunications laws so that companies like AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth can swoop in and become gatekeepers to Internet content -- in a way that benefits no one except the largest ISPs.
I'd like these people to tell us how it is that they appear together (usually one after the other) spouting identical industry talking points across the blogosphere.
What gives fellas? Are you being paid? And by whom?
-
Justice U.C.Maheshwari :
July 21, 2006 7:22 AMwant to know the broadband bill
RSS feed
lessgov :
April 10, 2006 9:01 PM
I fail to understand why the major Internet sites are so enamored of having government involved in this issue. Well, I guess I understand, but it seems extremely short sighted. It's not as though their allies on this issue have a reputation for being in favor of giant businesses. In the end, I can't see the benefit of asking the government to choose sides on this issue. Our legislators have special interests, not the consumer, in mind.