Undetectable Speed Detector


Scientists have invented an undetectable speed detector based on military technology which is used to create a visually based speed measurement device.

University of Florida researchers believe they have rendered makers of radar detectors and other speed detection countermeasures useless. Using a $5 million grant from the Air Force, they've developed software that can use live video camera footage to recognize objects and measure their speed. It does so by using a very common principle, i.e. the Distance = Rate X Time formula or in this case Rate = Distance/Time formula. It calculating the distance a car moves in a series of photos compared to a fixed object in the background. Because the system is passive, unlike conventional laser and radar speed guns, it cannot be detected.

"If it can view the object moving, that's all it needs. The computer figures out everything else," said Warren Dixon, University of Florida assistant professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering. "We're trying to use both regular and infrared cameras, so night or adverse weather conditions don't present a problem."

Now isn't technology just grand? As if police officers don't catch enough speeders now they're going to waste the money collected from past tickets to purchase these new-fandangled "camera speed detectors"? We all know tickets are a "money-game" to fill each town's coffers and the existing radar/laser guns do just fine. It's not like there is a shortage of speeders on the road, so why spend millions to catch people with radar/laser detectors? Do cops really hate rader/laser detectors that much? Most officers nowadays use "instant on" so they catch plenty of people using radar detectors. Maybe instead of investing in cameras to catch speeders with radar detectors police departments should invest in technology that catches criminals.

It may just be time to move to Germany where I can freely cruise the Autobahn without fear of driving 15mph over a posted 55mph speed limit at 2am with no one on else on the road. I've yet to see any statistics that prove driving 70mph causes more accidents. In fact, the Autobahn which has super high-speed drivers (>95mph) has a better safety record than U.S. highways.

| 3 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Listed below are links to sites that reference Undetectable Speed Detector:

Undetectable Speed Detector TrackBack URL : http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2345

Tom Keating Vents On Speeding from VoIP Blog - Rich Tehrani on April 22, 2005 10:06 AM

Having just done a whirlwind tour of Massachusetts I can tell you that the police are out in force. On the way up from Connecticut, we say about 5 speed traps or an average or one every forty miles or... Read More

3 Comments

| Reply

Dear Authority,

We are supplier of Truck Scale to the High Road department of Bangladesh. The Govt is showing interest to install some speed detector. we are new in this field. we are looking such kind of product and work as agent of that product in Bangladesh

WE want to do project on this give its constructional details.

| Reply

Why worry about Undetectable Speed Detector? What is the use of a Speed Detector if it cannot detect your plate number?
I am investigating on a UV system that will totally over-exposed the Speed Detector Camera so that it cannot see your vehicle plate number. They are going to spend 5 million on that Undetectable Speed Detector why I will only need 50k to have my UV system done. Is that worth it? And the costs of each system ? Less than 100 euro.

Will keep you posted !

Leave a comment

Recent Activity

Friday

  • Tom Keating posted VoIP in Google ChromeOS
  • Tom Keating tweeted, "VoIP in Google ChromeOS: Google released their ChromeOS operating system yesterday. So naturally, as a VoIP fan I w... http://bit.ly/3T68Ox"

Thursday

More...

Recent Comments

  • precoz: I am wondering, if the VOIP market is still increasing read more
  • Dustin: But that's not the point at all. The majority of read more
  • commangerYEK: Nicely done! read more
  • bstella: How did you get an email address to write to read more
  • Paul: Hi Mike, For Cisco (and normal SIP) passive VoIP recording read more
  • redshirt6: Yes, dying to know if it worked! rs6 read more
  • bruno.clermont: SkypeOut work only if I added their phone number as read more
  • bruno.clermont: I just installed it and try to do some call. read more
  • Kris: Tom, I'm curious. Did you ever get any resolution on read more
  • dsi r4: This is the age of smart phone.Nimbuzz launches it's phone read more

Subscribe to Blog

Recent Entry Images

  • google-chromos-flaphone-voip.jpg
  • startech-conxit-tool.jpg
  • thanksgiving-turkey.jpg
  • verizon-island-of-misfit-toys.jpg
  • mindtouch-cloud.jpg
  • microsoft-windows-20-history.jpg
  • taylor-randall-the-price-is-right.jpg
  • fring-google-android-skype.png
  • gotomeeting-logo.gif

Entry Archives

Around TMCnet Blogs

Latest Whitepapers

TMCnet Videos