Court declares VoIP is exempt from service fees

ars technica has a great article on how Vonage won its fight with the state of Nebraska over service fees. Nebraska wanted Vonage to "chip in" by paying into the state's Universal Service Fund (USF), a fund designed to offset the costs of providing phone service to remote areas. A court ruled in favor of Vonage by declaring federal law excludes VoIP providers from paying service fees. This is great news for VoIP service providers, especially ones that don't own the last mile, since they can continue to offer service at prices that drive the cost of traditional PSTN phone service down.

Vonage doesn't "ride" on phone wires anyway - they ride on the Internet - so why should they pay into the USF? Well, technically, a Nebraska citizen could have DSL Internet access and be using Vonage. But if they have DSL, they have a phone line and probably pay a service fee already. Actually, most phone companies don't offer "naked DSL" (Internet only - no phone service), so in most cases Vonage customers would be using cable broadband not DSL. In which case, why should Vonage subsidize the USF when it doesn't even "ride" on top of the phone wires? And even if it did, lots of Internet applications ride on top of DSL phone lines. Shall we start forcing MySpace, YouTube or Google to pay into the USF? Sheesh!

ars technica excerpt:

Late last year, VoIP provider Vonage sued the state of Nebraska over the Nebraska Public Service Commission's attempts to force it to pay into the state's Universal Service Fund. A federal court has rebuffed the Cornhusker State's attempts, barring the PSC from collecting USF fees from Vonage and, by extension, any other VoIP provider operating within the state.

In 2006, the Nebraska PSC decided that VoIP providers operating within the state boundaries should be forced to contribute to the USF, which is used to keep local telephone rates down and subsidize broadband access in Nebraska's rural areas. The decision required Vonage and its competitors to "pay a surcharge... for all their intrastate Nebraska traffic," finding that "federal law did not preempt that authorization."

The problem is that federal law does have something to say on the subject, and it contradicts Nebraska's opinion regarding whether VoIP is subject to state regulation.

Click here for more...

Post a comment

• VoIP » Court declares VoIP is exempt from service fees
• VoIP » Vonage » Court declares VoIP is exempt from service fees

Related Entries
• FCC Displeased with U.S. Broadband Deployment Rate - Apr 18, 2007
• Ring Voltage, REN, VoIP and a Bolt of Blue - Apr 24, 2008
• VoIP Pioneer Slams Sprint - Jan 25, 2008
• Number Portability Redux - Jan 21, 2008
• Vonage Blocking Ex-customer's Phone Number - Jan 14, 2008
• Vonage Outage - Dec 15, 2007
• Viseon, Vonage Video Phone Manufacturer, Bites the Dust - Nov 14, 2007
• Propel PBM improves QoS for VoIP, Skype, Online Gaming and more - Oct 24, 2007
• Minimizing network load when routing to Ported Mobile Phone Numbers - Oct 17, 2007
• Another VoIP Provider Bites the Dust - Sep 26, 2007

TechnoratiDel.icio.usSlashdotDigg

Tags: ars technica, Nebraska, PSC, Public Service Commission, Universal Service Fund, USF, VoIP, Vonage

Search Technorati: ars technica, Nebraska, PSC, Public Service Commission, Universal Service Fund, USF, VoIP, Vonage
Related Tags: phone service, state nebraska, service, Vonage, vonage, nebraska

Using each Web Services and AJAX, links below show you related pages by searching the web

Listed below are links to sites that reference Court declares VoIP is exempt from service fees:

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt3/t.fcgi/35624

Comments to Court declares VoIP is exempt from service fees

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember info? Notify me of new comments?

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)