<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/shaw-communications-sued-for-requiring-qos-on-voip.asp" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2014:/blog/tom-keating//4/tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.24523-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Shaw Communications sued for requiring QoS on VoIP</title>
  <subtitle>VoIP &amp; Gadgets blog - Latest news in VoIP &amp; gadgets, wireless, mobile phones, reviews, &amp; opinions</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:blog.tmcnet.com,2006:/blog/tom-keating//4.24523</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/shaw-communications-sued-for-requiring-qos-on-voip.asp" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=4/entry_id=24523" title="Shaw Communications sued for requiring QoS on VoIP" />
    <published>2006-03-22T20:13:56Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-10T21:35:19Z</updated>
    <title>Shaw Communications sued for requiring QoS on VoIP</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Shaw Communications, which found itself in hot water with Vonage Canada after &quot;hinting&quot; to its subscribers that they must pay $10/month to &quot;guarantee&quot; VoIP QoS - is at it again! :@ This time Zingotel is suing Shaw Communications claiming the...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Tom Keating</name>
      <uri>http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Shaw Communications, which found itself <a href="http://news.tmcnet.com/news/-vonage-canada-asks-crtc-investigate-shaw-voip-tax-/2006/03/08/1440827.htm">in hot water with Vonage Canada </a>after &quot;hinting&quot; to its subscribers that they must pay $10/month to &quot;guarantee&quot; VoIP QoS - is at it again! :@ This time Zingotel is suing Shaw Communications claiming the cable company refused to air a TV commercial promoting Zingotel's VoIP services. Yet again, one of TMC's own esteemed reporters, Johanne Torres has the scoop! Not to toot TMC's horn, but between <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/rich-tehrani/">Rich Tehrani</a>, <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/greg-galitzine/">Greg Galitzine</a>, myself, and several other TMC journalists, TMC covers VoIP better than anyone else - blogs, <a href="http://www.tmcnet.com">TMCnet.com portal</a>, tradeshows, etc. I've now been with TMC for 12 proud years and TMC just seems to get better and better along with hiring better talent.<br /><br />Ok, enough of patting myself, my co-workers, and my company on the back. Let me give you  a &quot;teaser&quot; from Johanne's article:<br /><br />&quot;It seems like <a href="http://www.shaw.ca/">Shaw Communications</a> shady consumer acquisition practices keep getting the company in serious trouble. The company was just slammed with a $1.2 million lawsuit from U.S.-based VoIP provider <a href="http://www.zingotel.com/">ZingoTel</a> claims that the Canadian cable operator refused to air a ZingoTel television ad because it promoted a competing VoIP-based calling service.&quot;<br /><br />Check out the <a href="http://news.tmcnet.com/news/2006/03/22/1481510.htm">excellent article</a> written by Johanne.<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
