A disturbing new trend is making the rounds in the halls of a cash-strapped Congress following the Sandy Hill shootings. The familiar scapegoat of "violent video games" is making an appearance, and new laws are being proposed to address the concept in the only way Congress seems to know how any more: lay taxes on it.
Basically, the plan--which seems to be limited to Missouri right now--would amend current Missouri tax law by tacking on a one percent surcharge for "violent video games", here defined as any game labeled T and up.
Of course, that would raise a lot of interesting questions, as somehow the state of Missouri would essentially be saying that games like "Zumba Fitness 2", "Rock Band", and "Forza Horizon" somehow qualify as violent, which makes about as much sense as washing laundry in a blender.
Meanwhile, the proceeds from said tax would be routed into a special fund used for the "treatment of mental health conditions associated with exposure to violent video games". This sounds fine and well, of course, until you look more closely at the statement itself. Since when, precisely, were "mental health conditions" ever "associated with exposure to violent video games"? Given that there are a massive number of violent video game players out there--we ran down the numbers in an earlier report--and there is absolutely nowhere near a one to one correlation between the two, I'd call it a long shot at best to say that there were any mental health conditions associated with violent video games.
While a one percent tax may not sound like much--a $60 game would be taxed about 60 cents--what has many concerned at this point is the sheer implication of it all. Today a 60 cent tax. Tomorrow? What's to stop the tax from going to 60 dollars and beyond? We've all seen what happened to cigarettes; taxes on a pack and a carton continue to climb whenever the state government starts feeling the bite.
Issues of enforcement come into play; online sales will be an issue, so too interstate sales. Will people drive to Illinois or Kansas to get their game on when Missouri passes the law? What of online delivery systems like Steam or Gamefly?
And what of game makers? Will they continue to make "violent video games" when they're taxed for doing so, reducing the likelihood that they'll sell? Will the ESRB ratings system be abandoned altogether?
There are a wide variety of implications for a system like this one, and few of them end well. Hopefully the residents of Missouri will make their voices heard on this one and keep the taxman's grip out of gamers' pockets.
Android (operating system) Bethesda Bethesda Softworks Downloadable content Electronic Arts Electronic sports Facebook Fallout (series) Fallout 3 Fallout: New Vegas Gamer Games Google IOS Maryland Massively multiplayer online game Microsoft Microsoft Windows Mobile game Nintendo Oculus Rift PC game Personal computer PlayStation PlayStation 3 PlayStation 4 Sony The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim United States Video game Video game console Virtual reality Wii Wii U World of Warcraft Xbox Xbox 360 Xbox Live Xbox One YouTube
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
Featured Videos