Several ideas/observations overheard at ITEXPO West last week in Los Angeles...
1. Get rid of the ethanol subsidy
Ethanol production--from grains as opposed to biowaste--is being criticized for generating more pollution than it solves through processing and transportation.
Kind of like LEED buildings being erected in car-oriented office parks, gouged out of what had been environmentally-beneficial fields, wetlands, forests...
2. Go nuclear, like France has done. Get away from coal, heavy oil, natural gas, hydro...
There is some logic here. The big question with nuclear is what to do with the spent fuel. Those costs must be factored into the price.
Then again, compared with bird-killing tailing ponds from tar sands production, blowing up mountaintops and gouging craters for coal, the refining process for oil and natural gas, damming up rivers for hydro...
3. Invest in electric high-speed rail, again like France
Makes sense. Electric rail transportation emits far fewer total emissions than driving and flying and requires much less greenspace.
Air and road travel have long had free rides--including on the environment--thanks to enormous direct and indirect subsidies that had put private rail passenger transportation out of business.
The transportation picture, and the environment and energy, not to mention urban development, would have looked much different, had there been a true free market competitive level playing field between modes.
To redress this balance there needs to be heavy government investment--like which was made on the Interstates and in airports that had nearly eliminated passenger and urban rail.
There is a high-speed rail vote going to the California electors this fall. There are also other transit funding measures on or will likely be on the ballot (a future entry in the Green Blog will look at them but this article in the July issue of the transit trade magazine Metro gives a good primer.
3. Look at shale and other oil sources
There is nothing evil about oil per se from any source, but the final costs from them must include all the direct and indirect environmental expenses incurred.
Anything less is a subsidy...
air travel al gore automotive carbon emissions carbon footprint carbon neutral carbon offsets commuter rail conference data center e-waste emissions energy energy conservation energy efficient energy reduction environment global warming green green energy green living green practices green tech green technology greenwash investing live earth mass transit Panduit power recycling solar sprawl Tandberg telecommute telework transportation Unified Physical Infrastructure UPI video conferencing
- Carbon Offsets (24)
- Environment (101)
- Green Investing (23)
- Green Living (20)
- Greenocrite (7)
- Recycling (12)
- automotive (24)
- carbon footprint (67)
- coal-to-liquid (4)
- corporate initiatives (76)
- data center (35)
- government initiatives (55)
- green technology (122)
- ip communications (17)
- solar (19)
- water (9)
- wind (12)
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Featured Videos