-
Applications of both low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF, 13.56 MHz) RFID are relatively mature.
-
During 2008, there will be massive applications of ultra high-frequency (UHF) RFID—especially in supply chain management.
-
RFID’s growth during 2008 will be supported by well-developed standards and technologies.
-
The three key areas for RFID application development are Beijing, Shanghai, and the Pearl River Delta.
-
The retail sector—lead by Wal-Mart—is increasingly using RFID to improve supply chain efficiencies.
-
Two key drivers for RFID’s use in supply chain management are reduced costs and enhanced automation.
-
HF RFID is used in ID card applications, and UHF RFID is part of the country’s railway systems project.
-
The Ministry of Science and Technology is planning 20 major RFID programs, for which the government is allocating more than $16 million. One of the largest is China’s second-generation resident identification card program.
700MHz alert Apple AT&T auction bid bidder BlackBerry Bluetooth business CallWave cell phone cellphone consumer Craig Settles CTIA FCC Google iPhone iPod laptop lawsuit mobile mobile phone mobility Motorola PDA RFID rumor sales smartphone spectrum Steve Jobs touchscreen video visual voicemail Wi-Fi WiFi WiMAX wireless
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006








In my opinion – probably more. This is also probably where China sees its policies as allowing for progress to happen, and sees American policies as stifling progress. If you speak to many Chinese businessmen / technology specialists, they do see the governments attitude as helping them achieve progress – and they see the general Western attitude as stopping progress from happening.
Interesting when you look at it from an objective and broader point of view. Who's right? And what matters more?