VoIP Quality from bad to worse
This seems overly inflated to me. Surely, 20% of calls can't be that bad or customers would switch from VoIP back to landlines. Me thinks this study is skewed to help build some publicity for Brix Networks. In fact, several bloggers and newsites have covered this study already.
Also, part of the About Brix Networks states, "to offer reliable and high-quality experiences in voice, video, data, and mobile services". So obviously, it behooves them to say that QoS monitoring is necessary - that's the service they sell.
Or perhaps Brix Networks in in cahoots with strong net neutrality proponents to try and prove that net neutrality is needed to prevent the cable MSOs, and broadband carriers from "squeezing" out VoIP players by throttling their bandwidth.
Or it could simply be all those MySpace blogs and YouTube videos clogging the damn Net! You make the call.
Post a comment
- Related Entries
- SightSpeed Light Flash Video on MySpace - Apr 22, 2008
- BabelTV integrates VoIP, YouTube, TV, iPod, Video, and more - Oct 26, 2007
- FCC adopts video franchise rules and overrules states that allow rural phone companies to block VoIP - Mar 05, 2007
- Video Franchise Fee Reform Bill Passes - Good news, Bad News - Jun 09, 2006
- Revenge of the Electric Company - May 01, 2006
- Ojo Phone Lives! - Mar 12, 2008
- MySpaceIM with Skype launches - Dec 11, 2007
- Skype High Quality Video Review - Nov 30, 2007
- Sat3Play Satellite Triple Play - cool stuff! - Nov 09, 2007
- SightSpeed offers High Quality Video Conferencing for the SMB - Oct 30, 2007
Search Technorati: cable, call quality, carrier, myspace, net neutrality, qos, video, voip, youtube
Related Tags: quality, Networks, networks, study
Using each Web Services and AJAX, links below show you related pages by searching the web
Listed below are links to sites that reference VoIP Quality from bad to worse:
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt3/t.fcgi/26378
» V2oIP Quality Alliance from VoIP Blog - Tehrani.com
The V2oIP Quality Alliance launched this week -- the goal of which is to increase the quality of voice over IP phone calls. Many of the people I spoke with in the organization would prefer the organization be called the... [More]
Tracked on September 15, 2006 7:47 PM
Comments to VoIP Quality from bad to worse
-
Greg Broiles :
July 25, 2006 7:57 PMI think it's also perfectly possible that the results aren't cooked, but are also not representative of most VoIP calls.
My typical use of testyourvoip.com is (a) if I am in a new place and am curious about the quality of VoIP call I can expect given local network conditions; and (b) if I am having quality issues with VoIP calls, and want to get some sort of external validation and measurement, since it can be tough sometimes to figure out if the problems are caused by my network, somewhere on the backbone, or perhaps by the network/telco/equipment at the other end of the call.
So testyourvoip.com's view of my VoIP experience is likely to be skewed negatively - when I'm at home or at work (where I've already got connections good enough to support good quality VoIP calls) I don't tend to use their website.
Also, when I have suggested VoIP to others, I typically simultaneously suggest they use testyourvoip.com to get an idea about local conditions before they invest a lot of time or money in VoIP conversion or experimentation. Again, these uses are not representative of typical VoIP calls.
Technorati
Del.icio.us
Slashdot
Digg
Previous blog:



RSS feed



John Griswald :
July 25, 2006 11:13 AM
Are you sure it isn't the series of tubes causing the problem?
I hear the Internet is like a truck.
Ok, enough bad Senator Ted Stevens jokes.
I'm not buying this "research" study either.