Much has been discussed during my recent travels about whether Internet access is a basic human necessity - reinforced by a recent survey and report from Cisco. Frankly it doesn't surprise me - access to the Internet has clearly become a core utility enabling business and our economy to move forward.
As the Internet becomes a core utility, a related question is will the Internet Telephony Service Providers (ITSPs), wireless providers and cable operators will have to settle on a role in the market as a "dumb pipe" (meaning delivering IP connectivity as their primary offer) vs. content and applications.
If history is any lesson, new utilities (like the founding of General Electric by Thomas Edison in 1890), create a product looking for an application and customers. To get the market started, utilities will often manufacture and sell products that create demand for the utility services. In GE's case, it was the invention of electric lighting and appliances that needed their electricity.
However, if you skip ahead to today, you can't imagine buying you new 60" HDTV set from your electric company. What changed?
Essentially, utilities are not generally good product companies. Product companies don't make good utilities. There's a disconnect in priorities and an almost conflict of interest in business practices and priorities.
What would this mean for today's ITSPs, wireless and cable operators? It's my opinion that they need to stick to what they are good at - delivering IP packets to businesses, residential and wireless customers. Charge for bandwidth - both quantity and quality, but please let the independent application and content companies (Hulu, Netflix, Vonage, Amazon...) create and distribute the services.
Back to studying history - can you imagine if Ma Bell required that they had to sell you the telephones that were connected to their network? We'd still be stuck with black touch-tone phones and grandma's princess phone.
So how do the ITSPs, cable and wireless providers make the transition? - by investing in the content and application companies, but not "supervising" their development. If Time Warner made an early investment in Facebook (surely one of the biggest network hogs on their IP network), they'd be a lot more wealthy today.
Apple asterisk AT&T AudioCodes Avaya Branch Office digium DirecTV Enterprise SBC FiOS Garmin GPS HD Voice HD Voip HD VoIP IBM Interactive Intelligence Internet Telephony ipod ITExpo Microsoft Microsoft Lync MSBG SBC ScanSource security SIP SIP Trunking sip trunking sips Skype survivability TiVo TMC Unified communications Verizon verizon VoiceCon VoIP VON
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
Featured Videos
Leave a comment