I tried out Windows 8 developer preview (32-bit) on a Dell E6500 dual core 2.26Ghz laptop and while the new UI is slick, the CPU processor is much SLOWER that the prior Vista 32-bit operating system it was running. Using PerformanceTest v7.0 (popular PassMark benchmark), the CPU benchmark went down from 2000 to 800! Similarly Windows Experience Index score for the CPU category went from 5.2 to 2.4. That's a 1/2 performance drop! Now, I did have to install a Windows 7 nVidia Quadro NVS 160M video driver and a few other Windows 7 drivers (memory card reader), but nothing CPU-related. I understand this is a "preview" version of Windows 8, but it certainly isn't installing confidence. While I love the amazing ~12s boot time on the Dell E6500, there is a noticeable performance drop compared to the prior Vista Business operating system.
Since I already upgraded (downgraded?) the laptop to Windows 8 (fresh install) and didn't capture benchmark screenshots at the time, I ran PerformanceTest v7.0 on an identical laptop running Vista Business for comparison. Though there is a different hard drive on this Dell E6500 Vista laptop, which did score slower in the hard drive benchmark testing than the Windows 8 Dell E6500. You would think a slower hard drive, a major factor in system performance would cause the Vista Business laptop to be slower than the Windows 8 laptop. Yeah, well we'd both be wrong. The overall PassMark score for the Vista laptop was 611.6 while the Windows 8 PassMark score was 411.7. Mind you, the Vista laptop would have scored even higher, had not the slower hard drive affected its score.
Let's go to the video tape and compare each laptop's benchmarks by category:
Vista System:
Windows 8 System:
Look at the red arrow above and compare with the prior image. You'll see that Windows Vista is using a 9X multiplier with a measured speed of 2261.1Mhz while Windows 8 is using a 6X multiplier with a measured speed of 1596.0Mhz. Well, there's the problem right there. For whatever reason, Windows 8 is underclocking the CPU - though I may be misusing that term. Interestingly, the Windows 8 laptop has a slightly faster Bus Speed and Front Side Bus, but not enough to make up for the fact that the CPU multiplier is only 6X.
Let's look at how this affects the other scores, including the 2D & 3D graphics score, memory score, etc.
Vista Summary:
Windows 8 Summary:
Vista CPU Mark:
Windows 8 CPU Mark:
Vista 2D Graphics Mark:
Windows 8 2D Graphics Mark:
Vista 3D Graphics Mark:
Windows 8 3D Graphics Mark:
Vista Memory Mark:
Windows 8 Memory Mark:
Vista Disk Mark: [only category where Vista scored lower due to different HDD]
Windows 8 Disk Mark:
Lastly, I wanted to show a screenshot of the Device Manager demonstrating that Windows 8 properly detected the dual core processor and there are no yellow exclamation marks under System Devices:
Conclusion:
Obviously, this is 'preview version' of Windows 8 (not even a beta yet) intended for developers and bleeding edge users - and not intended for production environments. Still, I wouldn't expect Windows 8 to not use the proper multiplier (9X) for the CPU clock speed. I upgraded the BIOS on the laptop, but that didn't help. I also tried turning off Intel SpeedStep to no avail. I also tried modifying my Power Plan to High Performance, thinking maybe the "Balanced" power plan was limiting the CPU clock speed. That didn't work either. I'm sure Windows 8 will work great on new hardware when it's released, but I for one will be hesitant to upgrade any computers/laptops because of the risk of a huge performance hit. Hopefully, Microsoft will fix the problem and advertise the fact that the CPU slowness issue was simply due to a driver issue or something else that is readily resolved.
Update:
Just ran the popular CPU-Z utility. According to CPU-Z, the Windows 8 laptop doesn't detect any multiplier and is running the clock speed at 1358.7MHz, while Vista's multiplier was usually 9X (though screenshot shows 8.5X) at a clock speed of 2261.1MHz. Definitely a problem with Windows 8's detection of processors and their capabilities.
Vista:
Windows 8:
Update 2:
I just realized that disabling Intel SpeedStep in the BIOS does improve performance, though it still doesn't match Vista's benchmark numbers. Still, it is much better now that I've disabled it. The prior screenshots were all taken with Intel SpeedStep DISABLED (faster). However, it is preferable to have this feature turned on. When I did have it enabled, performance was much worse. Here's 3 more screenshots showing Windows 8 performance with Intel SpeedStep ENABLED. If you compare with screenshots above you'll see a drastic performance drop with Intel SpeedStep turned on in the BIOS.
Windows 8 Summary: [e.g. PassMark drops from 411.7 to 243.7]
Windows 8 CPU Mark:
Windows 8 Memory Mark:
android apple asterisk at&t blackberry cell phone cisco dell digium e911 facebook fcc google google talk gps im ip-pbx ipad iphone ipod itexpo ITEXPO lync microsoft mobile phone open source outage phone review sip skype sony unified communications verizon video video conferencing voip vonage wireless xbox 360
- Apple (280)
- Bittorrent (2)
- Call Center and CRM (48)
- Computer Hardware (183)
- Computer Software (71)
- Gadgets (650)
- Google (225)
- Home Entertainment (264)
- Internet (173)
- Linux (111)
- Microsoft (376)
- MovableType (48)
- News (187)
- Personal and Humor (118)
- Politics (9)
- Reviews (246)
- Security (2)
- Social Networking (42)
- Sports/Outdoor Technology (9)
- Tablets (32)
- Technology and Science (355)
- Unified Communications (471)
- VoIP (2285)
- Wireless (584)
- p2p (20)
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
Featured Videos