I was looking forward to reading the post-election analysis from my copy of the NY Times left outside my Miami hotel room. But alas, the headline reads "A Supermajority in the Balance - Massachusetts voters went to the polls Tuesday to select a successor to Edward M. Kennedy, in a race that could deprive Democrats of a 60th Senate vote. Page A12. Results at nytimes.com."
Huh? The election results were known sometime between 8:30pm-9pm last night with Martha Coakley conceding. That's pretty early in the evening, so I'm surprised the NY Times wasn't able to get the story published before they went to press. If I was a right wingnut, I might claim liberal bias by The New York Times.
Perhaps the NY Times edition for Miami is printed up in New York and then flown down. Though, I would think in our digital age, it would be cheaper for the NY Times to digitize the newspaper and print it locally down here in Florida than flying down heavy newspapers. Not very green if you ask me and a HUGE carbon footprint! Anyone got a copy of today's NY Times in the Northeast area? What's the headline? Post a comment.
Here's the headline from my newspaper:
android apple asterisk at&t blackberry cell phone cisco dell digium e911 facebook fcc google google talk gps im ip-pbx ipad iphone ipod itexpo ITEXPO lync microsoft mobile phone open source outage phone review sip skype sony unified communications verizon video video conferencing voip vonage wireless xbox 360
- Apple (280)
- Bittorrent (2)
- Call Center and CRM (48)
- Computer Hardware (183)
- Computer Software (71)
- Gadgets (650)
- Google (225)
- Home Entertainment (263)
- Internet (173)
- Linux (111)
- Microsoft (376)
- MovableType (48)
- News (187)
- Personal and Humor (118)
- Politics (9)
- Reviews (246)
- Security (2)
- Social Networking (42)
- Sports/Outdoor Technology (9)
- Tablets (32)
- Technology and Science (355)
- Unified Communications (471)
- VoIP (2285)
- Wireless (584)
- p2p (20)
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
Featured Videos
The NYC edition has it as the main story: http://www.nytimes.com/indexes/2010/01/20/pageone/scan/index.html
Don't feel bad Tom. Same thing with my Wall Street Journal. I live in upstate NY (Binghamton area) and was looking forward to the coverage--but no stories about the election from last night. I expect they print the "outer reaches" editions well in advance.
Cool link! Didn't know NY Times offered scans of the front page. Come to think of it, doesn't the NY Times also have some funky PDF-like viewer as well?
Sounds like the NY Times in New York gets the latest possible news in their editiion while other parts of the country get a different version. That's too bad. They should improve that. Reminds me of "Dewey Defeats Truman" - the headline on the Chicago Tribune which was wrong.