Cisco Lost the iPhone Trademark

January 13, 2007
So it seems Cisco did not keep the trademark for the iPhone name. Why? No use. If you don’t produce a product with the named trademark you lose it. Makes sense right? Anyway it seems that Cisco may have tried to dupe or at least be extremely aggressive with the USPTO or US Patent and Trademark Office by renewing the iPhone trademark with a product that wasn’t yet called iPhone but rather the Linksys CIT200 and the Linksys CIT310.
 
Tom Keating was the first to have realized this as he has actually reviewed the products Cisco claims were called iPhone. Tom mentions in his blog there is no reference to the term iPhone on the boxes or manuals. If this is true and we aren’t all missing something obvious, Cisco may have lost the trademark on iPhone.
 
Does this mean Apple who has the name iPhone registered through a shell company could try to stop Cisco from using the name both domestically and internationally? This story is getting more and more interesting by the minute.


Tags: , , , , , ,
Search Technorati: , , , , , ,
Related Tags: , , , ,

Listed below are links to sites that reference Cisco Lost the iPhone Trademark:

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for Cisco Lost the iPhone Trademark:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt3/t.fcgi/31544

Comments to Cisco Lost the iPhone Trademark

RE: Cisco Lost the iPhone Trademark

Actually Vocaltec was the first to use the iphone name! http://flatplanetphone.com/wordpress/?p=30

 


(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)