I love gadgets and I love what Palm has done for the handheld market. I love the concept of Palm rolling out a new laptop-sized device. But that is where it ends. The new Palm Foleo has a fraction of the functionality of a Windows computer but is priced just under an equivalent laptop.It syncs nicely with your mobile device but then again so does your laptop.
I haven’t had a chance to use this new product but in my mind I can think of virtually no one who needs it. There are likely narrow vertical markets that need computing power on a platform that doesn’t get viruses but when we have laptops running Windows with millions of apps why on earth do we need a Linux-powered device that doesn’t run most applications?
Think of it this way. Even Apple has given into Windows and will warm-boot between it’s OS and Windows. Palm has no traction in the market in this segment and this could be one of the worst moves ever made in computing.
I keep trying to come up with a scenario where the Foleo makes sense and I just can’t. It seems doomed to me but perhaps Palm can morph it to be something useful down the line. But then again, I can't see what that will be.
Palm would have been much better off making a truly functional ultra-mobile PC as if there is a market here that is going to be it.
Technorati
Del.icio.us
Slashdot
Digg
twitter
On avgerage, The Palm Foleo is for the user who wants email, do documents, web search buy products and view photos, listen to music on the go. It does eveything a basic computer can do without worrying about virus software.
Palm's been sucessful because of the key traits. for 500 you get a get a 5 hour battery life, have bluetooth, weight 3 pounds, word process, no virus, and all in a nice compact portable size.
No laptop will get you that unless its over 1000, then sony throws stuff that you dont need a lousy webcam, no wordprocess, and so on.