Why Verizon Sued Vonage

November 23, 2007
I receive many questions about patents and why one company sues another. Patent portfolios are like nuclear weapons – if you have them, you are less likely to end up in a war. I was reminded of this idea as I read Ike Elliot’s Telecosm blog where he has an entry focusing on why Verizon is picking on smaller companies to sue.
 
Here is an excerpt:
 
How does a patent holder decide who to target? They usually consider the following:
1. Are we pretty sure the target is infringing our patent?
2. Are we infringing any of the target's patents?
3. Can we win a lawsuit if it goes to court?
4. Is it important to maintain positive relations with the target?
5. Is the target a competitor that we would like to impair?
 
 
This same argument by the way applies to AT&T and Sprint – both service providers have also sued the pure-play VoIP provider. Vonage is really vulnerable as it has done such an incredible job branding but not defending itself with a patent portfolio.
 
This should be a lesson to all companies who compete with powerful players and are taking share… Make sure you have a portfolio of patents to protect yourself or else.


Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Search Technorati: , , , , , , , ,
Related Tags: , ,

Listed below are links to sites that reference Why Verizon Sued Vonage:

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for Why Verizon Sued Vonage:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/mt3/t.fcgi/34139

Comments to Why Verizon Sued Vonage


(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)